Revised: 12 July 2008

© Brian W. Coad (www.briancoad.com)
BOOK I
A. Introduction
This version of the Freshwater Fishes of Iran website is presented in a book form.
Families of fishes are therefore arranged phylogenetically rather than alphabetically. The Introduction gives background information but the bulk of
the text is the Species Accounts. Certain parts are still under construction and this book form may lag behind the individual files in content.
The book is given as four files because of the length of the document (ca. 2000 pages). Book I is the current file and the other books are linked here:
Book II,
Book III and
Book IV, as well as below.
Contents
Book I
A. Introduction
Contents
Acknowledgements
Purpose
Materials and Methods
History of Research
Fisheries
Environment (Geography, Climate, Habitats, Environmental Change, Drainage Basins)
Scientific Names
Fish Structure
Collecting Fishes
Preserving Fishes
Quotes
B. Keys
Key to Families
Keys to Genera and Species
Keys to Regional Ichthyofaunas
C. Species Accounts
Family 1. Petromyzontidae
Family 2. Carcharhinidae
Family 3. Acipenseridae
Family 4. Anguillidae
Family 5. Engraulidae
Family 6. Clupeidae
Family 7. Chanidae
Book II
Family 8. Cyprinidae
Book III
Family 9. Cobitidae
Family 10. Balitoridae
Family 11. Bagridae
Family 12. Siluridae
Family 13. Sisoridae
Family 14. Heteropneustidae
Family 15. Esocidae
Family 16. Salmonidae
Family 17. Gadidae
Family 18. Mugilidae
Family 19. Atherinidae
Family 20. Adrianichthyidae
Family 21. Poeciliidae
Family 22. Cyprinodontidae
Family 23. Gasterosteidae
Family 24. Syngnathidae
Family 25. Mastacembelidae
Family 26. Percichthyidae
Family 27. Centrarchidae
Family 28. Percidae
Family 29. Sparidae
Family 30. Mullidae
Family 31. Cichlidae
Family 32. Gobiidae
Family 33. Channidae
Family 34. Scophthalmidae
Family 35. Pleuronectidae
D. Marine Species
Book IV
E. Checklists
Farsi Names
Scientific Names
Threatened Species
Types
F. Glossaries
Geographical Glossary
Ichthyological Glossary
G. Bibliography
H. Links
Acknowledgements
A wide range of people in Iran, Canada and elsewhere have assisted me in this work over more than 30 years. Inevitably, I will have forgotten some names which I
regret. Some people I never met formally, an example being the gentleman nattily dressed in suit by a stream near Kazerun who jumped fully-clothed into the water to help
me catch fish. Numerous other Iranians have assisted my studies and this website is dedicated to them.
The staff at the Department of Biology, Shiraz (then Pahlavi) University helped me in numerous ways to collect fishes during a three-year tenure as an Associate Professor. Dr. Bahman
Kholdebarin was Chairman of the Department for much of my time in Iran and it is only through his support that I was able to make the collections that enabled this work to be done. The Research
Council of Pahlavi University funded field trips and is gratefully acknowledged for this support. Collections were made with the help of drivers and assistants and their
efforts over long periods in the field are gratefully acknowledged. They include H. Assadi, M. H. Jaferi, Sh. Mansoorabadi, A. Shirazi, A. Tofangdar and N. Yaghar. Various other people assisted too
and are mentioned below under the Pahlavi University name.
Studies on Iranian fishes since my residence in Iran have been supported by grants from the Canadian Museum of Nature, Ottawa (CMN, fish collection acronym CMNFI), by assistance from staff there
including Noel Alfonso, Jadwiga Frank, C. G. Gruchy, Sylvie Laframboise, Alison Murray, Claude Renaud and Michèle Steigerwald, and by a wide range of students and volunteers. The staff in the
CMN library searched out all the numerous and varied papers on fishes in Iran and neighbouring countries without which this synthesis would not be possible. One paper took six years to locate and arrived
in the form of a microfilm from the Soviet Union. I am particularly indebted to Victor Adomaitis who kindly volunteered for the unrewarding task of scanning hundreds of
images and converting them to thumbnails and usable files. Mollie MacCormac carried on this task, making a wide variety of images available for the website.
In particular, I should like to acknowledge the support and encouragement of the late Dr. D. E. McAllister, Curator of Fishes, CMN over many years, in terms of training and education, both formal and
informal, of financial and moral support, and in practical terms in the ways and means of collecting, cataloguing, identifying, and studying fishes, and of getting things done.
Co-authors are evident in the Bibliography and their added expertise made several studies possible (authors marked by a * are first authors on some papers with me). These are in temporal order F. Krupp,
H. F. Alkahem, R. J. Behnke, G. B. Delmastro, M. Kuru, M. Sarieyyüpoglu, F. Papahn, L. A. J..Al-Hassan, A. Abdoli, N. Najafpour, *D. González-Solís, *F. Moravec, Y. Keivany, J. Holcík, J. W.
Atz, M. Naderi, *H. Ahnelt, *N. A. Hussein, *T. S. Ali, K. E. Limburg, B. Ya. Vilenkin, N. Keyzer-de Ville, *H. R. Esmaeili, T. T. Nalbant, and ?.
Various people and their organisations are mentioned below separately for their particular assistance; these are in alphabetical order.
Dr. Asghar Abdoli collected numerous specimens including exotics and allowed me to incorporate these discoveries in several papers.
Dr. P. Bănărescu, Institutul de Biologie, Bucureşti has communicated much information in detailed letters on fishes in the Middle East as well as
loaning and exchanging specimens, for all of which his assistance is acknowledged.
Dr. R. J. Behnke, Colorado State University, Fort Collins is gratefully acknowledged for his extensive loans of, and access to, collections he and associates made. These are listed more fully in the
Materials and Methods.
Prof. Dr. P. G. Bianco, University of Naples, allowed me free access to materials, including types, in his possession at the University of Naples and his hospitality is acknowledged.
Dr. N. Bogutskaya and Dr. A. Naseka, Laboratory of Ichthyology, Zoological Institute, Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg are thanked especially for their hospitality, access to
collections, data analyses and interpretations on Iranian fishes.
Dr. C. E. Bond, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State University, Corvallis allowed extensive loans of fishes from Iran under his care and these materials are listed in the Material and
Methods (see Contents).
Staff at the Fish Section, British Museum (Natural History) (now the Natural History Museum) have loaned materials and hosted visits on numerous occasions; their help has been much appreciated for the
extensive collections are a required study to understand the Iranian fauna. They include Dr. K. Banister, B. Brewster, P. Campbell, O. Crimmen, S. Davidson, Dr. P. H. Greenwood,
A.-M. Hodges, G. Howes, J. Maclaine, Dr. N. Merrett, Dr. D. Siebert, Dr. E. Trewavas, A. Wheeler and Dr. P. J. P. Whitehead.
Dr. T. Hrbek, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis is acknowledged for his complementary studies on tooth-carps using molecular techniques.
Dr. M. Kasparek and Prof. Dr. R. Kinzelbach kindly appointed me to the Advisory Board of the journal Zoology in the Middle East which has given me an interesting and valuable overview of studies in that
region.
Dr. Yazdan Keivany translated abstracts of his manuscript reports and first posted my bibliography of Iranian freshwater fishes on the internet - a stimulus to this work! He is continuing collaborative
efforts aimed at improving knowledge on the ichthyofauna of Iran.
Dr. Bahram Kiabi, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources is thanked for various items of information on fishes, translations and gifts of Farsi articles and many interesting
fish specimens. His efforts at facilitating collegiality and his students have formed the core of modern university researchers on the fishes of Iran.
Dr. F. Krupp, Johannes Gutenburg-Universität Mainz and Forschungsintitut Senckenberg (NaturMuseum Senckenberg), Frankfurt am Main contributed a wide variety of information on Middle Eastern fishes,
sent me copies of his theses and in his letters provided many stimulating points of discussion which helped me clarify my views on the fishes. His published works
are a model for students on fishes in that region. He, with Prof. Dr. Kinzelbach, kindly invited me to the Symposium on the Fauna and Zoogeography of the Middle East in Mainz, 1985.
Nasser Najafpour, Iranian Fisheries Research and Training Organization, Jahad-e Sazandegi,Ahvaz was instrumental in arranging visits to Iran and associated field trips. His enthusiastic cooperation in
the field resulted in many interesting new specimens and his studies on distributions of fishes in Khuzestan have been very important for this web site.
The team at Ahvaz is acknowledged below individually and in teaching me Farsi names of fishes. J. Gh. Marammazi was head of that team and his hospitality and efforts to bring me to Iran are gratefully
acknowledged.
Dr. T. T. Nalbant, National Museum of Natural History "Grigore Antipa",
Bucharest, is currently studying loaches I collected in Iran.
Staff at the National Museum of Natural History (Smithsonian Institution), Washington
arranged loans of specimens and allowed access to the collections during several
visits. They include K. A. Bruwelheide, Dr. B. B. Collette, S. Jewett, S.
Karnella and Dr. J. T. Williams.
Staff at the Fischsammlung, Naturhistorisches Museum Vienna have also loaned materials and hosted
visits and their assistance has been essential to studies on Iranian fishes
based on the collections of J. J. Heckel.
They include Dr. H. Ahnelt, Dr. E. Mikschi, Dr. B. Herzig and Dr. R. Hacker.
Dr. J. G. Nielsen and Dr. P. R. Möller, Zoological Museum, University of Copenhagen
facilitated access to collections despite the "orkan".
Dr. P. Bartsch and Mrs. C. Lamour, Museum für Naturkunde, Humboldt-Universität
zu Berlin for access to collections.
M. Rabaniha and F. Owfi, Persian Gulf Fisheries Research Centre, Bushehr and
Iranian Fisheries Research and Training Organization, Jahad-e Sazandegi, Tehran, kindly copied the MMTT catalogue for me
and showed me various specimens of fishes from their work in Bushehr Province and southern Iran.
Dr. Jalal Valiallahi provided stimulating discussions on the limits and the
content of the genus Barbus in Iran while working at the CMN as well as a
variety of photographs of these sometimes immense fish.
Prof. Dr. H. Wilkens, Zoologisches Institut und Zoologisches Museum der
Universität Hamburg kindly loaned materials and facilitated two visits to the
museum to examine materials.
Various people collected material for me or made gifts of material, sent specimens for identification, identified
material, allowed access to collections under their care, made loans of
material, provided other useful data and general information, and exchanged
ideas. These are listed below in alphabetical order with their affiliations at the time of their
contribution (and apologies if any titles are missing):-
K. Abbasi, Gilan Fisheries Research Centre, Bandar Anzali, H. A. Abdolhay, Tehran, A. Abdoli,
Fisheries Research Centre, Sari and Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, S. Abdolmalaki, Gilan Fisheries Research Centre,
Bandar Anzali, Dr. T. Abe, University Museum, University of Tokyo, Dr. M. Abedi,
Savadkooh University, H. Abyot, Iranian Fisheries Research and Training Organization, Jahad-e
Sazandegi, Ahvaz, Dr. A. Adhami, Muze-ye Melli-ye Tarikh-e Tabi'i,
Tehran, A. Afzali, Bandar Abbas, Dr. A. Akbary
Pasand, University of Zabol, Zabol, A. Alamdari, Organization of the
Environment, Shiraz, A. A. Al-Attar, Basrah University, A. W. Al-Hakim, University of Nottingham, L. A. J. Al-Hassan,
School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland,
S. A. S. Al Hatimy, Oman Natural History Museum, Muscat, W. Al-Baharna, Directorate of Fisheries,
Bahrein, Dr. N. M. Ali, Biological Research Centre, University of Baghdad, Dr. T. S. Ali,
University of Basrah, S. Alinejad, Offshore Fisheries Research Centre, Chah
Bahar, Iranian Fisheries Research and Training Organization, Jahad-e Sazandegi,
H. R. Alizadeh, Iranian Fisheries Research and Training Organization, Jahad-e
Sazandegi, Tehran, A. R. Al-Jafery, Department of Hydrobiology, Baghdad, Dr. H. Alkahem, King Saud
University, Riyadh, M. A. Al-Mukhtar, Fisheries Research Centre,
Ahvaz, Prof. O. A. Amin, Arizona State University, Tempe, Dr. F. Andreone, Museo Regionale di Scienze Naturali, Torino,
Dr. R. Arai, National Science Museum, Tokyo, G. Arbocco,
Museo Civico di Storia Naturale "Giacomo Doria", Genova, Dr. J. D. Archibald,
Yale University, Connecticut, Dr. N. B. Armantrout, Portland, Oregon, Dr. G. Arratia, University of Kansas, Lawrence,
S. Asadollah, Isfahan University of Technology, A. Ashraf, Encyclopædia Iranica,
Columbia University, New York, Dr. J. W. Atz, Department of Herpetology and Ichthyology, American Museum of Natural History, New York,
Prof. S. Balik, Ege University, Izmir, Prof. E. Balletto, Istituto di Zoologia, Genova, G. A. C. Balma, Museo Civico di
Storia Naturale, Carmagnola, Dr. K. Banister, Fish Section, British Museum (Natural History), London, A. J. Bardhun, Shiraz, D. M. Bartley,
Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Dr. V. V. Barsukov, Zoological Institute, Academy of Sciences, Leningrad, M. L. Bauchot, Laboratoire
d'Ichtyologie générale et appliquée, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, R.
Beck, COFAD GmbH, Tutzing, Dr. W. C. Beckman, Opelousas, Louisiana, Dr. A. Ben-Tuvia, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Dr.
M. Berberian, Uinversity of Cambridge, Dr. P. Berrebi, Université
Montpellier, Dr. A. D. Berrie, Freshwater Biological Association, Wareham, Dr. E. Bertelsen, Zoologisk Museum,
Copenhagen, Prof. Dr. P. G. Bianco, Universita degli Studi di l'Aquila, K. L. Bist, Government
Postgraduate College, Gopeshwar, J. Bohlen, Academy of Sciences, Libechov, Dr. J. E. Böhlke, Academy of Natural Sciences,
Philadelphia, Dr. A. H. Bornbusch, Duke University, Durham, Dr. J. Briggs, King Faisal university, Dammam, Dr. K. E.
Carpenter, Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, L. A. Cloutier, Department
of the Environment, Tehran, Dr. D. Coffey, Pahlavi University, Shiraz, Dr. M. J.
Collares-Pereira, Museu Bocage, Lisbon, Dr. J. T. Collins, Museum of Natural
History, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Dr. L. J. V. Compagno, J. L. B.
Smith Institute of Ichthyology, Grahamstown, Dr. B. B.
Collette, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, G. H. Copp, Centre for
Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft, Dr. L. Cornwallis, Oxford, A. S. Creighton,
Division of Fishes, Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Dr. E. J. Crossman, Department of Ichthyology and
Herpetology, Royal Ontario Museum, Toronto, E. L. Daniel, Encyclopædia Iranica,
Columbia University, New York, F. Darvishi, Mazandaran, S. Deeb, American University of
Lebanon, Beirut, S. Dehqan-Mediseh, Iranian Fisheries Research and Training
Organization, Jahad-e Sazandegi, Ahvaz, Dr. G. B. Delmastro, Museo Civico di Storia
Naturale, Carmagnola, M. Desoutter, Laboratoire d'Ichtyologie générale et
appliquée, Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, Dr. M. M. Dick, Museum of Comparative
Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, P. Dickinson, National Zoological Garden, Al Ain, Abu Dhabi, W. A. Dill, Davis,
California, J. Dominique, Freshwater and River Ecology Reserach Unit,
Villeurbane, Dr. P. Dugan, Penang, Malayasia, M. Doroudi, Iranian Fisheries
Research and Training Organization, Jahad-e Sazandegi, Bandar-e Lengeh, Dr. J.
D. Durand, ESA CNRS, Villeurbane, Dr. G. Ekingen, Veteriner Fakultesi, Elazig,
O.Elter, Museo ed Istituto di Zoologia Sistematico, Universita di Torino, Dr. B.
Elvira, Ministerio de Agricultura y Pesca, Madrid, G. El Zein, Université
Libanaise, Ksara, Dr. F. Erk'akan, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Dr. W. N.
Eschmeyer, Department of Ichthyology, California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, Gh. Eskandary,
Fisheries Research Centre, Jahad-e Sazandegi, Ahvaz, Dr. H. R. Esmaeili, Shiraz
University, D. Evans, IUCN, Cambridge, K. Evans, Pahlavi University, Shiraz, K. Fakhro, Directorate of Fisheries,
Bahrein, R. Fatemi, Tehran, Dr. A. M. Fazel, Natural Resources Faculty, Tehran
University, Karaj and Natural History Museum, Department of the Environment,
Tehran, , H. Fazly, Fereydun Kenar, Mazandaran, R. F. Field, Muscat, Dr. E. Firouz, Tehran, Dr. W. Fischer, Food and
Agriculture Organization, Rome, J. Fitzpatrick, Food and Agriculture
Organization, Rome, Dr. R. Fricke, Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde in
Stuttgart, P. A. M. Gaemers, Rijksmuseum van Geologie en Mineralogie, Leiden, M. D. Gallagher, Oman Natural History Museum, Muscat, M. Geerts,
Swalmen, The Netherlands, Prof. Dr. R. Geldiay, Ege University, Izmir, Dr. C.
George, Union College, Schenectady, Dr. H. Ghadirnejad, Iranian Fisheries Research and Training Organization,
Jahad-e Sazandegi, Tehran, A. Ghamoosi, Shahid Beheshti University,
Tehran, S. M. Ghasempouri, Tarbiat Modares University, Noor, Dr. D. I. Gibson,
British Museum (Natural History), London, D. Golani, Zoological Museum, Hebrew University of Jerusalem,
Dr. M. Goren, Tel Aviv University, S. Gorgin, Shiraz, Dr. B. Groombridge, UNEP
World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, Dr. S. H. Gruber, University of
Miami, J. M. Gunn, University of Ottawa, R. Haas, California State University, Fresno, M. Hafezieh, Research Centre for
Natural Resources and Animal Husbandry, Jahad-e Sazandegi, Shiraz, Dr. J.
Halpern, Pahlavi University, Shiraz, Dr. K. E. Hartel, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, S. S.
Hasan, University of Basrah, Dr. M. R. Hassannia, Jahad-e Sazandegi, Tehran, M. R. Hemami, Isfahan University of
Technology, D. M. Herdson, The Laboratory, Plymouth, E. Holm, Department of
Ichthyology and Herpetology, Royal Ontario Museum, Toronto, Dr. R. A.
Hinrichsen, Shad Foundation, Seattle, A.-M. Hodges, Fish Section, British Museum (Natural
History), London, M. L. Holloway, Fish Section, British Museum (Natural
History), London, L. Honarmond, University of Tehran, Dr. J. Holčík,
Institute of Zoology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Drs.
F. and Sh. Hosseinie, Shiraz University, Dr. C. Hubbs, University of
Texas, Austin, Dr. J. Huber, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, J.
Hull, University Museum, Oxford University, Dr. N. A. Hussain, Marine Science
Centre, University of Basrah, Ch. Izadi, Research Centre for
Natural Resources and Animal Husbandry, Jahad-e Sazandegi, Shiraz, Gh.
Izadpanahi, Dr. B. Jalali, ABZIGOSTAR, Tehran, Dr. S. Jahromi, Pahlavi University, Shiraz, Dr. S. Jamili, Iranian Fisheries Research and Training
Organization, Jahad-e Sazandegi, Tehran, Gh. A. Jasimi, Iranian Fisheries
Research and Training Organization, Jahad-e Sazandegi, Ahvaz, Dr. M. N. Javed, Government College,
Lahore, Dr. K. C. Jayaram, Zoological Survey of India, Calcutta, K.
Jazebizadeh, Iranian Fisheries Research and Training Organization, Ahvaz, Dr. J. B. Jensen, Pahlavi University, Shiraz, Dr. R. K. Johnson,
Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, W. J. Jones, Al Ain, U.A.E., Dr. H. G. Kami, University of Tehran, J. M. Kapetsky,
Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Dr. M. H. Karim Koshteh, University of
Guelph, Dr. M. Kasparek, Kasparek Verlag, Heidelberg, Dr. E. J. Keall, Royal Ontario Museum, Toronto, Dr.
A. Keyvanfar, Centre national de Transfusion sanguine-Institut, Paris, Dr. G.
Khalaf, Lebanese University, Mansourieh-el-Metn, Dr. N. R. Khamees, University of
Basrah, S. Khera, Punjab University, Chandigarh, A. Khodady, Shahid Chamran
University, Ahvaz, Prof. Dr. R. Kinzelbach, Zoologisches Institut, Darmstadt,
Dr. W. Klausewitz, Forschungsintitut Senckenberg, Frankfurt, Dr. W. L. Klawe,
Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La
Jolla, Dr. M. Kottelat, Zoologsiches Staatsammlung, Munich, Dr. A. Kownacki,
Laboratory of Water Biology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, Dr. S. O.
Kullander, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, Dr. K. Kuronuma, Tokyo
University of Fisheries, Dr. M. Kuru, Hacettepe University, Ankara, P. Lamothe,
Hydro Québec, Montréal, Dr. K. J. Lazara, US Merchant Marine Academy, Kings
Point, New York, A. Lealmonfared, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Dr. R. E. Lee, Pahlavi University, Shiraz,
Dr. K. E. Limburg, State University of New York, Syracuse, Dr. R. Littman,
University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Prof. Dr. H. Loffler, Vienna, R. Lolea, Gorgan University, J. Long, Department of Fisheries
and Wildlife, Oregon State University, Corvallis, O. Lucanus, Montreal, Dr.Mabee, Department of Zoology,
Duke University, Durham, A. A. Mahdi, University of Basrah, A. Mahjoor Azad,
Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Dr. P. S. Maitland,
Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Edinburgh, Dr. H. Malicky, Biologische Station
Lunz, L. Maltz, Tel Aviv University, J. Mansoori, Iranian Fisheries Research and Training Organization, Jahad-e
Sazandegi, Ahvaz, J. Gh. Marammazi, Iranian Fisheries Research and Training Organization, Jahad-e
Sazandegi, Ahvaz, R. Martino, American Killifish Association,
Dr. M. Masoumian, Iranian Fisheries Research and Training Organization, Jahad-e
Sazandegi, Tehran, Dr. A. Matinfar, Iranian Fisheries Research and Training Organization, Jahad-e Sazandegi, Tehran,
Y. Mayahi, Iranian Fisheries Research and Training Organization, Jahad-e
Sazandegi, Ahvaz, Dr. R. L. Mayden, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alabama,
Tuscaloosa, J. J. McAniff, National Underwater Accident Center, University of Rhode Island,
Kingston, M. McDavitt, Alexandria, Virginia, S. Mickleburgh, Fauna and Flora
Preservation Society, London, H.Meeus, Belgische Killifish Vereniging, Wommelgen,
R. Mehrani, Lorestan Research Centre of Natural Resources and Animal Science, Khorramabad,
Dr. A. G. K. Menon, Zoological Survey of India, Calcutta, Dr. S. N. Messieh,
UNDP, Abu Dhabi, Dr. F. T. Mhaisen, University of Baghdad, Dr. A. Miller,
Royal Botanic Garden, Edinburgh, I. D. Miller, United States-Saudi Arabian Joint
Commission, New York, Dr. P. Miller, University of Bristol, Dr. R. R. Miller,
Division of Fishes, Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Dr. A. A. Mirhosseyni,
National Natural History Museum, Baghdad, Dr. M. R. Mirza, Lahore, A. Mobaraki,
Department of the Environment, Tehran, M. R. Mohaghegh, Tehran, M. Mohammadi, Gorgan Agricultural and
Natural Resources University, Dr. S. Moini, Department of the Environment, Tehran, Dr. B. Mokhayer, University
of Tehran, Dr. K. Molnár, Veterinary Medical Research Institute, Hungarian
Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Dr. F. Moravec, Institute of Parasitology,
Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences, Prague, E. Morin, SOGREAH, Echirolles, Dr. E. O. Murdy,
Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs, Washington,
Dr. G. S. Myers, Scotts Valley, California, M. Naderi, Mazandaran Fishery Research Centre, Sari, S. Naem,
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Orumiyeh University, A. Nasrollahzadeh, Gilan,
Prof. Dr. C. M. Naumann, Universität Bielefeld, Dr. S. Nazeeri, Iranian
Fisheries Research and Training Organization, Jahad-e Sazandegi, Khorramabad, R.
B. Nehring, Department of the Environment, Tehran, N. Niameymandi, Persian Gulf Fisheries Research Centre, Bushehr,
Dr. H. Nijssen, Instituut voor Taxonomisch Zoölogie, Zoölogisch Museum, Universiteit van Amsterdam, M.
Nikpaey, Iranian Fisheries Research and Training Organization, Jahad-e Sazandegi,
Ahvaz, N. Nouri, Iranian Fisheries Research and Training Organization, Jahad-e
Sazandegi, Tehran, Dr. O. Oliva, Charles University, Prague, Dr. H.-J. Paepke, Museum für
Naturkunde der Humboldt-Universität, Berlin, Dr. A. Paltrinieri, World Health
Organization, Muscat, F. Papahn, Shahid Chamran University, Ahvaz, Dr. L. R.
Parenti, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, J. Parkinson, Edmonton,
A. Parsamanesh, Iranian Fisheries Research and Training Organization, Ahvaz, D. Peck, IUCN, Gland, T. Petr, Food and
Agriculture Organization, Rome, H. Piri Zirkohy, Gilan Fisheries Research
Centre, Bandar Anzali, Dr. E. P. Pister, Desert Fishes Council, Bishop,
California, S. P. Platania, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, T.
Plosch, Ganderkesee, L. Podshadley, Department of Ichthyology, California
Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, Dr. M. Pourgholam, Iranian Fisheries Research and Training Organization,
Jahad-e Sazandegi, Sari, M. Price, Division of Fishes, Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Dr. G. S.
Proudlove, Department of Environmental Biology, University of Manchester, T. A. Qureshi, Technical
Institute for Agriculture, Amara, M. Rabbaniha, Persian Gulf Fisheries Research
Centre, Bushehr, Dr. H. Rahimian, University of Tehran, Dr. M. Ramin, Iranian
Fisheries Research and Training Organization, Jahad-e Sazandegi, Tehran, F. M.
Razi, Nature and Wildlife Museum, Tehran, Dr. W. J. Rainboth, University of
California, Los Angeles, R. W. Redding, Museum of Zoology, University of
Michigan, Ann Arbor, D. Rees, BBC, London, Dr. K. Relyea, Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research,
H. Rezai, Tehran, Dr. S. Rezvani Gilkolaei, Iranian Fisheries Research and Training
Organization, Jahad-e Sazandegi, Tehran, S. Richards, Murray, Utah, Dr. T. R. Roberts, Kasetsart
University, Bangkok, Dr. I. Rostami, Shahid Chamran University, Ahvaz, B. Saadallah, Iraq
Natural History Museum, Baghdad, M. A. G. Saadati, Department of the
Environment, Mashhad, H. Saadoni, Iranian Fisheries Research and
Training Organization, Jahad-e Sazandegi, Ahvaz, H. R. A. Sabet, Iranian Fisheries Research and
Training Organization, Tehran, A. R. Saeed, University of Kerman, E.
Saderigh-Nejad Massouleh, Iranian Fisheries Research and Training Organization,
Jahad-e Sazandegi, Khorramabad, H. Safikhani, Iranian Fisheries Research and
Training Organization, Jahad-e Sazandegi, Ahvaz, Dr. A. Salnikov, Institute of
Zoology, Academy of Sciences, Ashkhabad, Dr. A. Samaie,
Muse-ye Melli-ye Tarikh-e Tabi'i, Tehran, B. Sanford, Montrose, Colorado and
Port Ludlow, Washington, Dr. A. Sanyal, Zoological Survey of India, Calcutta,
Dr. M. Sarieyyüpoglu, Firat Üniversitesi, Elazig, Dr. A. Savari, Faculty of
Oceanography, Shahid Chamran University, Ahvaz, M. Sayfali, Shahid Beheshti
University, Tehran, D. A. Scott, Dursley, Gloucestershire, Dr. D. E. Sergeant,
Arctic Biological Station, Ste-Anne de Bellevue, Quebec, Gh. Shakhiba, Iranian Fisheries Research and
Training Organization, Ahvaz, A. J. Shams, Directorate of Fisheries,
Bahrein, Dr. I. Sharifpour, Iranian Fisheries Research and
Training Organization, Ahvaz, J. W. Sherman, Academy of Natural
Sciences, Philadelphia, Dr. A. Shiralipour, Pahlavi University, Shiraz, Dr. I. Q. Siddiqui, King Faisal University, Al Hasa, Dr.
P. Skelton, Fish Section, British Museum (Natural History), London, Dr. G. R. Smith, Museum of
Zoology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Dr. W. F. Smith-Vaniz, Academy of
Sciences, Philadelphia, M. Soleymani, Green Front of Iran, Tehran, N. Statman,
Dr. A. N. Svetovidov, Zoological Institute, Academy of Sciences, Leningrad, Dr. C. C. Swift, Natural
History Museum of Los Angeles County, Dr. F. Terofal,
Zoologische Sammlung des Bayreischen Staates, Munich, M. V. Tofighi, Iranian
Fisheries Research and Training Organization, Jahad-e Sazandegi, Tehran, A.
Torfi, Iranian Fisheries Research and Training Organization, Jahad-e Sazandegi,
Ahvaz, Dr. W. Torke, Institut fur Urgeschichte, Tübingen, Dr. E. Tortonese, Museo Civico di Storia Naturale,
Genova, Dr. R. A. Travers, Fish Section, British Museum (Natural History), London, R. G. Tuck,
Muze-ye Melli-ye Tarikh-e Tabi'i, Tehran, Dr. H. Türkmen, Istanbul
Üniversitesi, Dr. E. Unlu, University of Dicle, Diyarbakir, Dr. I. Unsal,
Istanbul Üniversitesi, T. Valinasab, Fisheries Research and Training Organization, Jahad-e
Sazandegi, Tehran, Dr. J. Valiallahi, Tarbiat-e Modarres, Noor, >W. van Neer, Royal Museum of Central Africa,
Tervuren, Prof. Dr. R. Victor, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Prof. Dr. W. Villwock, Zoologisches
Institut und Zoologisches Museum, Hamburg, Dr. V. D. Vladykov, University of
Ottawa, A. Vosughi, Iranian Fisheries Research and Training Organization, Jahad-e
Sazandegi, Tehran, B. Waaland, Pahlavi University, Shiraz, P. Walczak,
Department of the Environment, Tehran, Dr. B. A. Whitton,
University of Durham, Dr. R. Winterbottom, Department of Ichthyology and
Herpetology, Royal Ontario Museum, Toronto, Dr. G.
H. Wossughi, University of Tehran, Dr. T. C. Young, Royal Ontario Museum,
Toronto, M. Zapater, Zaragoza, A. R. Zeanaie, Payam-e Noor University, Bandar Abbas.
Individual Iranians, too numerous to mention here, kindly enunciated
carefully and repeatedly Farsi fish names for my cloth ear.
However it would be remiss not to mention staff at the Iranian
Fisheries Research and Training Organization, Ahvaz including N.
Najafpour, Gh. Marammazi, Gh. Eskandari, and M. A. Al-Mukhtar, as well as
E. Firouz, Tehran, B. Kiabi and A. Abdoli, Gorgan Agricultural and
Natural Resources University, and Y. Keivany, University of Alberta, Edmonton.
And finally I must thank my wife Sylvie and son Nicholas for supporting me in
my obsession with fishes from Iran and Nick for constructing the index page for
this website and linking it to the internet.
Purpose
This work is meant to provide a guide to the freshwater
fishes of Iran. There are no modern keys to this fauna, some available books are
incomplete or cursory treatments or outdated, and the detailed and diverse scientific
literature is widely scattered in time, languages and journals. Iran lies
at a region of major zoogeographical interchange and has a diverse and
interesting ichthyofauna about which comparatively little is known. An
accurate identification is a pre-requisite for further scientific studies
and this website aims to serve that purpose and to be an introductory guide
to the fishes. The guide is aimed at a mixed audience, including scientists
familiar with ichthyology to whom some introductory sections of this work
will be superfluous, and those whose knowledge of fishes is embryonic or
who may have limited access to literature sources.
This work has been carried out over a period of over 30 years from my first
arrival in Iran in January 1976. In that year, 7 articles were published
strictly on Iranian fishes (3 on parasites, 1 on pesticides, 1 on fisheries, 1
describing the blind white fish and 1 a summary of the latter; 2 were in Farsi). In 2006, 160 articles on Iranian fishes appeared,
along with many relevant works from neighbouring countries, works on the
aquatic environment in Iran and works on taxonomy and systematics relevant to
Iran. The study of fishes is now a very active field within Iran and the Middle
East. Accordingly, 2008 is the last year that this work was updated although
some systematic and taxonomic studies may still be incorporated.
The Introduction contains several explanatory sections. These sections include detailed methods of counting and
measuring characters, an explanation of scientific names of fishes, details
of fish structure so that keys can be readily understood, ways of capturing
and preserving fishes and recording the all-important collection data,
and how to identify fishes. This introductory part also
includes a brief review of the history of research on Iranian fishes and
descriptions of the environment including geography, climate, habitats,
environmental change and drainage basins.
The bulk of the text is the "Species Accounts" which serve
to identify, describe and map the distribution of each species. Families
of fishes follow Nelson (2006) with genera and species arranged alphabetically within each family. Each Species Account
is comprised of the following parts: the scientific name, common names,
sections on systematics, key characters, morphology, sexual dimorphism,
colour, size, distribution, zoogeography, habitat, age and growth, food,
reproduction, parasites and predators, economic importance, conservation,
further work, sources, and an illustration and a distribution map.
The biological information may be cursory. Many species
are poorly known and their biology has not been studied, especially within
Iran. Some information is available for species shared with Turkey and
Iraq and I have tried to incorporate this literature as being less well
known or accessible. Many Caspian Sea basin species are shared with Europe
and the former U.S.S.R., are comparatively well-known and have an extensive
literature, often summarised in books, bibliographies and synopses. It
is not known in many cases if their biology in Iran is similar. Iranian
populations are often referred to distinct subspecies and occur at the
southern limit of the species range. Only a brief, summary account of their
biology is therefore given from synoptic literature sources. Biological
information generally is a brief summary of literature and readers should
consult the original papers for more details.
Some anecdotal biological information is added from my
field collections where spawning individuals were noted or gut contents
examined superficially. Most fish spawn in the spring. Feeding habits can
often be deduced from morphology. Fish with an arched and ventral mouth,
horny jaw edge, elongate gut and black peritoneum are feeders on detritus
and aufwuchs scraped from rocks. Most fish with a simple, s-shaped gut
feed on invertebrates such as crustaceans and aquatic insect larvae. A
few fish with molar pharyngeal teeth have a diet of molluscs whose shells
are crushed by the heavy teeth. Some fish are piscivorous and have an appropriate
jaw shape and streamlined appearance suitable for catching and holding
their fish prey. Fish with elongate and numerous fine gill rakers filter
phytoplankton or zooplankton from the water column. Very few fish feed
on macrophytes (large plants).
"Checklists" summarise the diversity of the ichthyofauna. "Glossaries"
explain both ichthyological terms for those new to the science and
Farsi and geographical terms for those unfamiliar with that
language. A "Bibliography" comprises books and papers referred to in the text and other relevant
works, which form a good general basis for the
serious student of Iranian freshwater fishes.
Materials and Methods
1. Materials
The descriptions in this work are founded on original
observations of material and a consideration of the literature. The sources
of this material are various museums which house a scattering of Iranian
species including in particular the Natural History Museum, London (formerly
the British Museum (Natural History)), the Naturhistorisches Museum Wien,
and the Zoological Institute, St. Petersburg which are depositories for
older type material, but the bulk of the research has been based on four
collections. The first of these was made by V. D. Vladykov during 1961
and 1962 when he was an Inland Fisheries Biologist under the Expanded Programme
of Technical Assistance of the Food and Agriculture Organization, UN. This
material was deposited in the National Museum of Natural Sciences, Ottawa
(now the Canadian Museum of Nature) and consists mainly of specimens from
the Caspian Sea basin. The second collection was made by employees of the
Department of the Environment, Tehran, and N. B. Armantrout and R. J. Behnke.
Half this collection was placed in the National Museum of Natural History,
Tehran (Muze-ye Melli-ye Tarikh-e Tabi'i) and half was retained by R. J.
Behnke and formed the basis of Saadati's (1977) thesis at Colorado State
University, Fort Collins. This collection covered the whole of Iran except
the Caspian and Sistan basins. Through the courtesy of Dr. Behnke I have
been able to examine this material in Fort Collins and make extended loans
for study in Ottawa. The Muze-ye Melli-ye Tarikh-e Tabi'i collection is
small (examined in 1995; catalogue 2000) and not as diverse as the Fort Collins material. Oregon State
University contains a collection of fishes made by W. Kinunen, S. Bullock,
R. RaLonde and P. Walczak, who were members of the Peace Corps in Iran
(some of this collection was deposited at the Smithsonian Institution,
Washington, which helped to fund the collection and transport of specimens).
Dr. Carl Bond kindly loaned me much of this material for long periods.
This collection was from all parts of Iran. The last collection, comprising
the bulk of the material, was made by me from 1976 to 1979 while I was
teaching at Pahlavi (now Shiraz) University in Shiraz. This collection
is housed in the Canadian Museum of Nature, Ottawa (formerly NMC, now CMNFI), and
covers all of Iran except the extreme northeast and northwest. Field trips
were funded by the Research Council of Pahlavi University. Subsequently
various Iranian colleagues have sent me specimens and these too are incorporated
in the present work. Principal among these were materials collected by
Asghar Abdoli (then based in Golestan) and Nasser Najafpour and associates of the Iranian Fisheries
Research Organisation (IFRO), Ahvaz. These collections together effectively
cover all the major drainages of Iran and provide the best foundation yet
assembled for a study on this ichthyofauna.
All material stored at the Canadian Museum of Nature,
Ottawa was examined in 45% isopropyl alcohol. Preservative was later changed
to 70% ethanol. The Canadian Museum of Nature also stores extensive field
records including slides, numerous data sheets on most species (counts
and measurements including x-ray plates), an extensive literature base
including translations from foreign languages, and comparative specimens
and literature from other countries in Southwest Asia.
2. Methods
Specimens collected by me were caught by any means that
presented themselves. Gear used included seines of various lengths and
mesh sizes (much repaired and patched!), gill-nets of various stretch meshes
(sometimes used as seines), cast-nets of several diameters (thrown skilfully
by others and poorly by me), by hand, and by purchase from small boys and
anglers using a variety of techniques (of angling on their part and of
persuasion on mine to extract catches from their possession). The object
was to sample any water body for all the kinds of habitat found there within
the limitations of a hasty schedule and the available equipment. Most habitats
were visited for less than one hour, but in the small springs and streams,
which comprise the bulk of Iranian fresh waters outside the large rivers
and lakes of Khuzestan and Sistan and the deep waters of the Caspian Sea,
this was more than adequate to catch a good and varied sample of most species.
This was borne out by repeated visits of longer duration to certain localities
near Shiraz. Pools and flowing sections were seined, gill-netted or cast-netted.
Riffle areas were also attacked in this fashion or seines were used to
block off sections of riffle and upstream rocks disturbed by kicking to
scare secretive species like loaches into the fixed net. In small streams
a dip-net was placed downstream of individual rocks which were kicked over
and the net scooped along the stream bed. Cast-nets proved particularly
useful in rocky streams which had little open water. Draped over the rocks
and only partly in the water, they nevertheless caught large and fast specimens
which were unobtainable by seining. The available fishing gear was less
effective on large rivers and on the Caspian Sea. Here boats, long gill-nets
and trawl gear would have been most useful. The collections are poor in
inhabitants of the main current of large rivers and in the deep water species
of the Caspian Sea. Larger specimens in major water bodies undoubtedly
evaded my nets with ease; some samples of larger individuals were available
from other collections and by purchase from commercial fisheries.
Several criteria were used to select specimens for counts
and measurements. Where few specimens were available, all were counted
and measured. Where several hundred specimens were available selection
was by size (usually larger fish; sometimes much smaller fish as well for
comparison with adult values), by sex to ensure an adequate representation
of males and females, and by locality where geographical variation was
examined. Badly damaged or grossly deformed specimens were excluded but
there was no (conscious) selection for "ideal" specimens.
Wherever a putative species was collected from more than
one drainage basin and material diversity permitted, a comparison was made
between the drainage basins. This work is continuing and details of methods
and materials are to be seen in published results. Students of Iranian
fishes should note that the application of sufficient statistical "weight"
will reveal differences between drainage basin samples and this is especially
true of a desert and semi-desert country like Iran. Springs and streams
may have been colonised by only a few founders. A small population sampled
in the lower reaches of a stream may not have had any contact with conspecifics
higher up in the stream for many generations. Conversely, several seasons
of heavy rain may have afforded recent opportunities for contact and gene
exchange. A one-time sample from a stream may therefore give a quite inaccurate
picture of the character suite of that population. Whether any of the differences
detected have systematic significance requires careful consideration. For
example, Balletto and Spano (1977) described 9 subspecies of Garra
tibanica in the southwest of the Arabian Peninsula using Principal
Components Analysis. This has been termed "statistical overkill" by Alkahem
and Behnke (1983). Also Krupp (1983) has observed that samples of Garra
rufa from the same locality collected in different years or seasons
varied in several characters. Description of subspecies based on limited
material requires a great deal of care therefore.
There are various methods of measuring and counting anatomical
features of fishes. The ones I have used are outlined below. They are based
on Hubbs and Lagler (1958) and Trautman (1981). Some particular characters are
outlined in papers by me in the Bibliography.
The method of counting fin rays differs from that in use
in North America since unbranched and branched rays are counted separately.
A "III,8" count in the European literature would be "9" in the system advocated
by Hubbs and Lagler (1958), i.e. the soft ray count is increased by one
to convert from the "European" to the "American" system. The bulk of the
work on fishes of southwest Asia follows the European system and I have
adopted this methodology to facilitate comparisons, although eschewing Roman numerals.
A) Meristic characters
In this book, scale counts, number of gill rakers and
of vertebrae are usually expressed as ranges based on literature sources
since frequency counts are rarely given. A separate section gives counts
on Iranian fish examined by me followed by a frequency in parentheses (..).
Fin ray counts often show strong modes, but citing the mode alone would
be misleading. Pharyngeal tooth formula is often a modal value from the
literature; loss of or incomplete development of major or minor row teeth
is not uncommon, so counts may vary quite markedly.
Scale counts and paired fin ray counts were made on the
left side of each fish. In some instances, such as a badly deformed fin
or where scales on the left were mostly missing, counts were made on the
right. These instances were rare and restricted to species with low sample sizes.
Not all meristic characters had equal sample sizes; some
material from other museums was not available for x-rays, large series
of pharyngeal tooth counts was not often available because removal of arches
damages specimens, some specimens were damaged in certain characters, time
did not always permit all characters to be counted, some species are well-known
and additional data from Iran is clearly a subset of widely gathered data,
some species were examined in detail to address systematic problems, and so on.
1) Vertebrae
All vertebrae were counted including the hypural plate
as one vertebra. In Cypriniformes and Siluriformes, the four Weberian vertebrae
were included in the count. Almost all counts were made from radiographs.
2) Gill rakers
All rakers on the first gill arch were counted. A lower
limb count in the literature includes any raker at the angle of the upper
and lower limbs. Gill raker counts presented something of a problem when
comparing specimens of disparate sizes. The smaller fish often had very
small rakers at each end of the arch. These were easily missed or torn
off when cleaning a debris-encrusted arch. Removal of arches for a more
careful examination may also damage or destroy the finer rakers which are
intimately associated with the tissues adjacent to the arches. Alizarin
preparations can be of assistance, but the finer rakers may have no bony
content and thereby be omitted. Counts of juvenile fish may therefore give
lower values than counts for larger fish, whether this be due to an increase
in gill raker number with age or because rakers are more easy to count
in larger fish. This kind of variation is only critical where this character
is being used in species identification or in analyses meant to define
and relate species.
3) Pharyngeal teeth
The teeth of the modified fifth gill arch in Cyprinidae
were counted in each row and given as a formula from left to right. A count
of 2,5-4,2 consists of two teeth in both the outer left and outer right
rows, five teeth in the inner left row and four teeth in the inner right
row. Pharyngeal teeth rows in Iranian cyprinids varied from one to three
on each side. In certain cases, it was evident from the presence of a socket
that a tooth had been lost. The count then included that tooth.
4) Fin rays
a) Dorsal and anal fins
Fin ray counts were divided into two types. One count
is of spines or hardened soft rays or any unbranched, unpaired unsegmented
rays and this is usually given in Roman numerals in the literature. In
deference to some Iranian unfamiliarity with Roman numerals, the spine
count is given in Arabic numerals in this text. Spine count included rudimentary
rays which, at the anterior dorsal and anal fins, may be obscured by flesh
or scales requiring some probing or dissection. Radiographs were often
useful to confirm counts made under a microscope. The second count is of
soft rays and is also indicated by Arabic numerals. These rays are usually
branched, flexible, segmented and laterally paired. The last two unbranched
rays often arise from a single internal base and were then counted as one.
This is generally the case in Cyprinidae. The branched ray count is the
most diagnostic and variable in such fishes. Some families contain species
with more than one dorsal fin. The first dorsal fin may be composed of
spines and the second dorsal fin of spines and soft rays. In such species
the count is given separately for each fin.
b) Caudal fin
The branched caudal fin rays only were counted. Dorsal
and ventral to these central rays are a series of unbranched rays which
become progressively smaller and may be obscured by flesh and scales where
the caudal fin attaches to the caudal peduncle. Counts in other works often
comprise the branched rays plus one dorsal and one ventral unbranched ray.
Caudal fin ray counts are remarkably uniform within families. In Cyprinidae
the count is almost always 17, except for occasional variants. Garra
persica was unique in having a strong modal count of 16 branched caudal
fin rays.
c) Paired fins
Paired fin ray counts can be separated into unbranched
and branched rays. A small splint in some species at the origin of the
paired fins was excluded from the count. There is usually one unbranched
ray which is not included in counts cited here. The branched ray counts
were the most important and are the ones given here. However, in the pectoral
fin the innermost rays were often difficult to discern and may increase
with age.
5) Scales
a) Lateral line count
The first scale counted was that scale contacting the
pectoral girdle. The count continued along the flank following the pored
scales and including small, additional scales lying between the large,
regular scales as well as any unpored scales. The small, additional scales
were relatively rare occurrences and any obviously abnormal fish - those
with healed injuries for example - were not counted. The count terminated
with the scale lying over the end of the hypural plate as determined by
flexing the caudal fin. Some works recommend inclusion of a scale overlying
the flexure only if most of its exposed field is closer to the body than
to the caudal fin. Since the flexure of the caudal fin produces a relatively
broad groove, this is difficult to judge in smaller fish. Therefore, the
most posterior scale whose exposed surface touched the groove was the last
scale counted. I have also continued the count onto the caudal fin in some
species for a total count as this sometimes proved useful in comparison
with counts in older literature.
b) Scales above the lateral line
This count commenced with the scale at the origin of the
first dorsal fin and continued down and back to, but not including, the
lateral line scale. Any scale partially or wholly straddling the dorsal
fin origin was counted as one scale. The count followed the natural scale
row and included any small or irregular scales in the row.
c) Scales below the lateral line
This count commenced with the scale at the origin of the
anal fin, followed the natural scale row up and forward to, but not including,
the lateral line scale and included any small or irregular scales. In this,
and the previous count, it sometimes proved necessary to shift the counting
row because of the scale arrangement. This was always a backward shift.
In some instances there were several scales at the anal fin origin which
overlapped each other very closely. All these were counted and account
for the large degree of variation in counts between individuals of some species.
d) Scales between the lateral line and the pelvic fin origin
This count was made as in the above count.
e) Predorsal scale rows
All rows of scales between the origin of the dorsal fin
and the head were counted just below the mid-line of the back on the upper
flank. The final "row" at the occiput may consist of a single scale. This
method was used because scales on the mid-line may be small and irregular,
obscured by heavy pigment, or absent.
f) Caudal peduncle scales
This was the lowest count of the scale rows around the
caudal peduncle, usually at its narrowest point. Both lateral line scales
were included. Scale rows were counted even when the scale arrangement
was such that occasional alternate rows touched. This count may be quite
consistent between individuals of a species, but it may also vary markedly.
The variation depended on the presence of large scales dorsally and ventrally
on the caudal peduncle connecting the flank scale rows. When such large
scales were present bridging over the top and bottom of the caudal peduncle,
the total count could be, e.g. 12, but in some individuals two or more
smaller scales occupied their positions so that the scale count jumped to 16.
B) Morphometric characters
All measurements were to the nearest 0.1 mm using dial calipers.
Measurements were taken on the left side unless a left fin,
for example, was badly deformed or broken. Badly deformed specimens were
not measured. Distortions due to preservation, such as a gaping mouth or
expanded gill covers, were gently adjusted to as natural a position as
possible. The following list explains how the various measurements were
taken. All measurements were taken in a straight line and not over the
curve of the head or body.
1) Total length
From the anteriormost part of the head to the tip of either
lobe of the caudal fin when that fin is normally splayed.
2) Standard length
From the anteriormost part of the snout (even when the
lower jaw projects) to the end of the hypural plate (the end of the plate
is found by flexing the caudal fin; in small fish it may be seen by shining
a strong light through the caudal region). Standard length can be an inaccurate
measurement. The end of the hypural plate is obscured by scales, flesh
and caudal rays. Its position is determined by flexing the caudal fin;
this flexure is taken to be the end of the hypural plate. Small fish have
thin, delicate bones and the flexure may be at the anterior base of the
hypural plate, at the origin of the caudal fin rays which articulate with
and overlap the end of the hypural plate, or even between the last whole
vertebra and the hypural plate. Large fish have a broad flexure which can
give a variety of measurements by independent observers. Fortunately, in
this study most fish were comparatively small and strong illumination helped
to discern the end of the hypural plate. For larger fish I can only plead
an attempt at consistency.
3) Head length
From the anteriormost part of the snout to the bony margin
of the opercle (excluding the opercular membrane).
4) Body depth
Maximum straight line depth excluding fins or fleshy and
scaly structures at fin bases
5) Body width
Maximum distance from one side of the body to the other.
6) Head depth
From the occiput vertically to the breast or lower head
surface.
7) Head width
The distance between the opercles when in their normal,
closed position. The opercles are gently pressed into a closed position
if greatly dilated.
8) Snout length
From the anteriormost part of the snout or upper lip at
the mid-line to the bony front margin of the orbit.
9) Orbit diameter
Greatest diameter between the bony rims of the orbit.
This distance is not always horizontal.
10) Postorbital length
Greatest distance between the posterior bony orbit margin
and the bony opercular margin.
11) Interorbital width
Least bony width between the orbits over the top of the
head in a straight line.
12) Predorsal length
From the base of the anteriormost dorsal fin ray to the
tip of the snout or upper lip.
13) Prepelvic length
From the base of the anteriormost pelvic fin ray to the
anteriormost point on the head (snout or upper lip).
14) Preanal length
From the base of the anteriormost anal fin ray to the
anteriormost point on the head (snout or upper lip).
15) Length of caudal peduncle
The oblique distance from the insertion of the anal fin
to the mid-point of the end of the hypural plate.
16) Depth of caudal peduncle
The least depth of this structure from the mid-line of
the ventral surface.
17) Length of the longest dorsal and anal fin rays
From the structural base of the ray to its tip.
18) Length of the dorsal and anal fin bases
From the anteriormost ray base (the origin of the fin)
to the point where the fin membrane contacts the body behind the last ray
(the insertion of the fin).
19) Length of the pectoral and pelvic fins
From the extreme base of the uppermost, outermost or anteriormost
ray to the tip of the fin.
20) Distance between pectoral and pelvic fin bases
Used principally in Cyprinidae and Cobitidae, this and
the following measurement are from the extreme base of the anteriormost,
uppermost or outermost ray of the appropriate fin to the anterior base
of the next fin.
21) Distance between the pelvic and anal fin bases
As above.
22) Length of fin spine
From the base of the spine to its tip. In pungent spines,
as in catfishes, this excludes soft rays or membranes distal to the sharp
tip, but in more flexible spines, which may taper gradually as in Cyprinidae,
this measurement includes the soft tip.
History of Research
Written records extend back to the third millennium B.C.
in Mesopotamia, the plain shared between Iran and Iraq. The Uruk IV symbol
for fish dates to 3100 B.C. or 5050 B.P. Later cuneiform writing on clay
tablets refer to fishes and attempts have been made to identify the species,
with variable results (Scheil, 1918; Diemel, 1926; Civil, 1961: Landsberger, 1962; Salonen,
1970; Sahrhage and Lundbeck, 1992). About 324 Sumerian and Babylonian fish names
have been identified referring to about 90 species (some of which are marine). Fish played a prominent
part in every day life, both as food and as religious
symbols (van Buren, 1948; Salonen, 1970; de Moor, 1998).
Fishing regulations had set penalties and fishing rights were leased. Guilds of
fishermen existed and transport to cities with marketing was organised. Fish
were sun-dried, salted, pickled, fermented and possibly smoked. Fishermen
had to deliver part of their catch to the temples or as duties. Surplus
fish were sold to the public. Consumption of fish was prohibited on certain days
(Sahrhage and Lundbeck, 1992). See also
Freshwater Fishes of Iraq website here.
The Babylonian Epic of Creation mentions nets and splitting fish for drying. Amulets and cylinder seals
depicting fish are common. A hymn which praises Ishtar of Uruk gives the
result of her favour as "whole channels are filled with fish, the channels
swarm with fish and with dates". Fish were offered as sacrifices to gods
and as part of funeral rites, as symbols of life and its renewal, and of
fertility (Wright, 1990). The amount of fish required was clearly stipulated
and whether it should be fresh, roasted or dried. The commoner species
were requested by the basketful but rarer species were requested by numbers
so a practical knowledge of diversity existed in the distant past. So numerous
were sacrificial offerings that at Uruk I the floor of a room or court
was covered with a thick layer of fish scales and fatty waste that gave
it a deep golden-yellow tinge. Some areas had layers of compacted fish,
4-5 cm thick, comprising skeletons, skin and scales, indicative that these
were not kitchen wastes but were sacrifices (van Buren, 1948). An Assyrian
king would have 10,000 fish served at a banquet, although these were cheaper
food items and the Sumerians favoured large, plant-eating carps from muddy pond bottoms (de Moor, 1998).
Archaeological remains containing fish bones at Abu Salabikh, Iraq, dated to 3000 B.C. (and summarised for south
Mesopotamia), have been identified to include Barbus esocinus, B. grypus, B. kersin, B. luteus, B. sharpeyi,
B. xanthopterus, Aspius vorax, Acanthobrama (presumably A. marmid), Cyprinion sp.,
Alburnus sp., Silurus triostegus, Mystus pelusius, Mastacembelus mastacembelus, Liza abu,
Acanthopagrus sp., and Tenualosa ilisha.
Radcliffe (1926), Salonen (1970) and Sahrhage and Lundbeck (1992) review fishing in Assyrian
and Sumerian-Akkadian times using nets,
spears, traps, weirs and copper hooks and line. Contracts concerned with fish ponds date
from the reign of Darius II, in 422 B.C., and with fishing in 419 B.C.
He also discusses Ea, the god of water dating back to Sumerian times,
for which a fish-god or man-fish was a symbol, still to be seen on ancient
monuments in Iran (see also Green (1986)). The Middle Elamite rock relief at
Tall-i Bakun near Persepolis in Fars depicts a river filled with fish but these
are highly stylised and not identifiable to species.
A'lam (1999b) briefly reviews fish in pre-Islamic Persian
lore but most, if not all, the fishes referred to are unidentifiable today. Illustrations of fishes
often occur in art work but are generally unidentifiable to species. One example
is a 14.5 cm, 12th century bowl from 12th century Iran in the Victoria and
Albert Museum, London. The bowl has shoals of fish in a rotating design painted
in black slip on a frit ware bowl under a turquoise clear glaze (www.iranian.com/Arts/July97/Design/Page6.html,
downloaded 10 June 1997). Governmental revenue from the Caspian fisheries have been recorded as early as
820-873 under the Taherids. Alam (no date) summarises the history of fisheries in Iran.
The Arabic work Aja'ibu-l-Makhluqat or "Wonders of Creation"
by Zakariya b. Muhammad b. Mahmud al-Kammuni al-Qazwini published in 1263
A.D. and later translated into Persian and enlarged in 1275, records sharks
entering rivers at the head of the Persian Gulf to Basrah on the Tigris
and comments on their ferocity and their teeth like points of spears, swords
or saws. Other Arabic and Persian works contain few recognisable species
of freshwater fishes although the tenth century Kitab al-Tabikh
from Baghdad contains some fish names such as bunni (= probably Barbus
sharpeyi) and shabbût (= probably Barbus grypus)(Perry,
1998). Probably the best example of an early "scientific" Islamic work
on zoology is the fourteenth century "Nuzhatu-l-Qulub" or "Hearts Delight"
by Hamdullah Al-Mustaufi Al-Qazwini (translated into English by Stephenson
(1928)). Only the "tarikh" is identifiable as a freshwater fish - Alburnus tarichi from Lake Van in modern Turkey.
Generally paintings of fish on historic items are insufficiently
detailed to allow identification to species (see Stchoukine (1936) for
some examples). However an interesting painting of a fish is found on a
Persian miniature of the fourteenth century stored in the Metropolitan
Museum of Art, New York (Dimand, 1934). The painting shows Jonah leaving the mouth of a fish.
A colour figure of this painting is found in Gould and Atz (1996),
although the image is reversed and a corrected colour version is in Coad et
al. (2000). The painting is from Rashid ad-Din's Jami` al-Tawarikh
or "Universal or World History" which contains accounts of various historical
and mythical events, including the history of China and Mongolia, the Bible
and incidents in the lives of Mohammad and Buddha. As Dimand (1934) points
out, this book was highly favoured by Persian painters of the fourteenth
century and several copies exist, the earliest being 707 A.H. (= 1307 A.D.).
The painting, dating to about 1400 A.D., shows Jonah being cast up by a
fish. The text on Jonah's arms however reads "The disk of the sun entered
into darkness" on the left arm and "Jonah entered the mouth of the fish"
on the right arm. The former, which was taken from the Gulistan
(= Flower Garden) of Sa`di written in 1258, being a more poetic rendering
of the latter. The angel, however, appears to be offering the naked Prophet
a garment, and this, as well as the proximity of terrestrial vegetation,
suggests he is leaving the mouth of the fish.
The fish undoubtedly was copied by the Persian artist
from Chinese paintings (Rice, 1976; Blair, 1995). It most closely approximates
some kind of carp but its mouth has been enlarged to accommodate the squatting
figure, and the opercular opening approaches the eye too closely to make
it a recognisable rendition of any particular species. There also are two
dorsal fins (not found in any member of the carp family), and the pectoral
fins are located too far from the head. Nevertheless, the fish does exhibit
a number of well-observed features such as symmetrical, overlapping scales
on the body with smaller ones on the caudal peduncle, paired and median
fins with fin rays, and the absence of head scales and teeth.
In modern Iran, the fish is still a symbol of prosperity,
blessings, abundance and happiness at Now Ruz, the Persian New Year
on 21 March, when a live fish from a store (usually a goldfish) or local
stream is kept in a bowl. In Persian mythology the earth is balanced on
the horn a gigantic cow and as the new year starts the cow throws the earth
from one horn to the other. The movement of the fish in the bowl when this
happens shows that the new year has begun (Noorbaksh, 1995). Anahita, the
ancient god of water, watched over people in their dealings with water
and fish (Sajaadyeh, 1995).
A general survey of natural history studies in the Muslim
world is given by Mirza (1983), an Islamic approach to the environmental
crisis by Zaidi (1981), and Islamic principles for conservation by Ba Kader
et al. (1983).
Travelers from Europe often wrote up accounts of their
visits to Persia and some commented on the fishes although such comments
were mostly of a general nature and species were rarely identified. An
exception is the trout near Tehran and some of the older comments on these
populations are given in the species description. A summary and translation
into English of the earlier accounts may be found in Pinkerton (1758-1826).
Adam Olearius noted that the king leased fishing in the rivers entering the
Caspian. The lessees blocked the river from September to April near the mouth to
catch migrating fishes. Outside this area anyone was free to fish. Sir John
Chardin, in a series of English and French editions from 1686
to the early nineteenth century of his Description of Persia and Other
Eastern Nations, briefly mentioned fishes (see quote at the beginning
of this work, taken from Sykes (1927)) as did Fraser (1825; 1834), both
authors observing the lack of diversity in a water-poor country but commenting
on the presence of fishes in qanats. Continuing in full the abbreviated
quote from Fraser (1825) at the beginning of this work:-
" I may remark as a curious fact in zoology, that many
of the cannauts, both here (i.e. at Neyshabur) and at Shahrood, swarmed
with fish, some of which were of considerable size. When it is remembered
that these are not natural, but artificial sources of water, brought from
under ground for distances of many hundreds and even thousands of yards;
and that the water, after issuing into the open air, has but a short course,
being either entirely absorbed in irrigating the cultivation, or lost in
the barren plain beyond it, and thus having no communication whatever with
any large or permanent body of water, it seems difficult to account for
the presence of these fish. The natives say that they are to be found in
most considerable cannauts, but are never put into them by the hand of
man. It may be added, that we saw no fish in any of the mountain streams
on the southern face of the Elburz, although some that we crossed were
clear, and of considerable depth. The Russian soldiers, who catch these
fish, observe the same fact, all are taken in cannauts, not in the natural
streams. They are a leather-mouthed fish, of no great delicacy, but perfectly
sweet and wholesome".
Cornelius Bruyn (1652-1719) (or Corneille LeBrun, de Bruin)
depicts several fishes from his journey through Russia and Persia, mostly
from the Persian Gulf, but including one called "sjir-majie" (= shir mahi
or milk fish) which Heckel (1843b) identifies as Capoeta trutta
and states that it is from Esfahan. Capoeta trutta is not found
near the city of Esfahan. This illustration appears in volume 1, page 185,
plate 69 of the Amsterdam edition in French published in 1718. However
a reading of the text and examination of the illustration (slides kindly
provided by Martine Desoutter of the Muséum national d'Histoire
naturelle, Paris) show that the fish cannot be identified so clearly. No
scales are shown and the colour pattern is unusual and unlike any Iranian
freshwater fish. The colour pattern is vaguely reminiscent of Barbus
lacerta, although much exaggerated. The illustration is possibly based
on a Barbus or a Capoeta species. The author was in Esfahan
on 23 November 1703 when describing the fish but the specimen is mentioned
in the same paragraph as a "Lezard de mer....prend dans le Golfe Persique"
and I take this to mean that the fish too may come from a locality on or
near the Persian Gulf rather than the neighbourhood of Esfahan as Heckel (1843b) has it.
Scientific works relevant to Iran begin with the Systema
Naturae, 10th edition, by Carolus Linnaeus (1701-1778) published in 1758
and in which scientific naming in zoology has its beginning. Linnaeus adopted
many of the names from the system developed by Petrus Artedi (1705-1735)
who, on a visit to Amsterdam to examine a collection of fishes from the
East and West Indies, drowned in one of the canals. Genera subsequently
found in Iran include Acipenser, Perca, Cobitis, Silurus, Salmo, Esox,
Atherina, Mugil, Cyprinus, and Syngnathus and various species
were described in these and other genera. After this date a variety of
papers were published by authors in many countries describing fishes scientifically
and some of these fishes were eventually found to occur in Iran, as with
the Linnaean genera and species. Examples include Marc Elieser Bloch (1723-1799),
a physician who began to devote himself to ichthyology at the age of 56,
and Johann Gottlob Schneider (1750-1822) who collaborated with Bloch and
published their "Systema Ichthyologiae" in 1801 after Bloch's death. This
work contains all known species at that time (Bloch also wrote "Naturgeschichte
der ausländischen Fische, 1785-1795) and in these works appear such
Iranian species as diverse as the riffle minnow, Alburnoides bipunctatus,
the Indian stinging catfish, Heteropneustes fossilis, and the snakehead,
Channa gachua (see Karrer et al., 1994); Johannes Müller
(1801-1858) and Friedrich Gustav Jacob Henle (1807-1885) who published
their "Systematische Beschreibung der Plagiostomen" in 1838-1841, the classical
work on sharks and their relatives; Antoine Risso (1777-1845), an apothecary,
who published in 1810 his "Ichthyologie de Nice" in which are described
two mullet species (Liza aurata and L. saliens) and an atherinid
(Atherina boyeri) and in a later work (1826) the pipefish (Syngnathus
abaster) which are now recorded from Iran; and lastly Franz Steindachner
(1834-1919), director of the "Kaiserlich-Königliches Naturhistorisches
Hof-Museum (or Imperial-Royal Natural History Court-Museum - now the Naturhistorisches
Museum at Vienna), who wrote so copiously on fishes from all over the world
that any systematist eventually must consult his works, e.g. for the description
of Schizopygopsis stoliczkae (1866) and Nemacheilus angorae
(1897)(see Kähsbauer, 1959; Adler, 1989; Herzig-Straschil, 1997).
A number of fish species are named by others for Ferdinand Stoliczka (1838-1874),
who collected extensively in the Himalayas and was appointed naturalist
to the Second Mission to Yarkand, but who died on the way to Leh through
hardships encountered on this journey (see Day, 1876; 1878).
Fish descriptions from the Middle East begin with the
work of Fredrik Hasselquist (1722-1752) in his "Iter Palaestinum eller
Resa til Heliga Landet Förrättad ifrån År 1749 till
1752" or "Voyage to the Holy Land Undertaken from the Year 1749 to 1752"
which was published by Linnaeus in 1757 after Hasselquist "Succumbed to
the fatigues and cares of the Journey" (Günther, 1869). Although this
work appeared before Linnaeus' 10th Edition and is thus rejected as far
as scientific nomenclature goes, it still contains recognisable and scientific
descriptions of fishes.
Alexander Russell, physician to the British Factory at
Aleppo from 1742?-1753, gave an account of four undescribed fishes from
modern Syria in 1756 (see Russell (1794) for greater detail and illustrations)
of which Mystus pelusius and Mastacembelus mastacembelus
were later found in Iran. The descriptions in this work are attributed
to Daniel Carl Solander (1736-1782) and to Sir Joseph Banks (1743-1820)
and Solander respectively (Wheeler, 1958). Since then a number of works
have appeared on Middle East fishes and although many were restricted to
Syria, the Jordan River basin or drainages of Anatolian Turkey they often
contain descriptions of species also found in Iran (see Bibliography).
Peter Simon Pallas (1741-1811) and Johann Anton von Güldenstädt
(1745-1781) described species from the Caspian Sea basin but outside Iranian
waters (Pallas, 1771, 1776, 1787, 1814; Güldenstaedt, 1772, 1773,
1778). von Güldenstädt was a naturalist on the expedition led
by Pallas charged with exploring the Russian Empire of Catherine II. Pallas
travelled to the Urals and eastwards while Güldenstädt went south
to the Caucasus, only returning to St. Petersburg seven years later (Mearns
and Mearns, 1988). Güldenstädt died in St. Petersburg at only
36 years of age from fever, his resistance weakened by diseases caught
in the Caucasus. Pallas based some of his descriptions on the work of Samuel
Gottlieb Gmelin (1743, 1744 or 1745-1774), an explorer and Professor of
Botany at St. Petersburg employed by the Russian government who visited Gilan
and Mazandaran in 1770-1772, living at Anzali for some months. Gmelin
died a captive of a Caucasian chieftain, the Khan of Khaïtakes. A
translated account in English of his travels in northern Iran is given by Floor
(2007). It includes descriptions of fishes and fishing methods such as cast
nets and gill nets.
>Other important eighteenth and early nineteenth century
authors describing and collecting fishes eventually found in northern Iran
include A. Lovetzky and Johann Friedrich Brandt (1802-1879), Director of
the Zoological Museum at St. Petersburg, who worked on sturgeons and described
respectively Acipenser nudiventris and Acipenser gueldenstaedtii,
and Karl Eduard von Eichwald (Eduard Ivanovich Eikhval'd)
(1795-1876) who travelled to the Caucasus and Caspian Sea including Iran
(1825-1826) and collected fishes although he was prevented from landing
at Anzali by the Persian Governor. Eichwald's "Fauna Caspio-Caucasica"
(1841) was of particular importance as it carried descriptions of new species
and records of a variety of other fishes. Édouard Ménétries
(= Menestrier) (1802-1861) was Curator of the Zoological Collection at
St. Petersburg and collected fishes in the Caucasus during 1829-1830 and
reached the Talish Mountains (Kuhha-ye Tavalesh). He listed a number of
species found in the Caspian Sea and its tributaries in his Catalogue (1832).
Alexander von Nordmann (1803-1866) described the fishes of the Black Sea
in 1840 including gobies (Gobiidae) since found in the Caspian Sea and
the herring Clupeonella cultriventris and the minnow Rutilus frisii.
Further to the east, there were Francis Buchanan (1762-1829)(later
Hamilton or Hamilton-Buchanan or Buchanan-Hamilton - the name Hamilton
was assumed on succeeding to property in Scotland of his mother, a Miss
Hamilton) whose work on the fishes of the Ganges River in India with 269
species published in 1822 contains species later found at the westernmost
extremity of their range in south-eastern Iran such as Aspidoparia morar
(Gudger, 1924), and John McClelland (1805-1875) who described fishes collected
by William Griffith (1810-1845) with the Army of the Indus in Afghanistan
including the Helmand River basin which shares waters with Iran (McClelland,
1842). Some material was lost or badly damaged and the descriptions are
"inadequate and highly confusing" (Hora, 1933).
Several authors worked on marine fishes in the Indian
Ocean and Red Sea, describing species eventually found to penetrate or
live in fresh waters of southern Iran. First among these was Petrus Forsskål
(1732-1763), a Swedish member of a Danish expedition to the Red Sea in
1762 (Nielsen, 1993). Forsskål and four of his companions died and
it was left to the sole survivor, Carsten Niebuhr (1783-1815), to publish
Forsskål's fish descriptions posthumously in 1775. Some of Forsskål's
specimens survive as dried skins in the Zoological Museum of Copenhagen.
Forsskål was the describer of the milkfish, Chanos chanos.
Wilhelm Peter Eduard Simon Rüppell (1794-1884) of the Senckenberg
Museum, Frankfurt collected fishes in the Red Sea in 1822 and published
"Fische des rothen Meeres" in his "Atlas zu der Reise im nördlichen
Afrika" (1828-1830) followed by further field work in 1831 resulting in
a second "Fische des rothen Meeres" in Neue Wirbelthiere zu der Fauna von
Abyssinien gehörig (1835-1838). Rüppell described the tooth-carp
Lebias dispar (= Aphanius dispar) now found throughout southern
Iran. Later works are summarised by Dor (1984) and Dor and Goren (1994)
for the Red Sea. The Persian Gulf fishes have received attention although
there has been no comprehensive review of the fauna and its literature.
Some principal works on this marine fauna include Blegvad and Loppenthin
(1944), White and Barwani (1971), Randall et al. (1978), Relyea
(1981), Sivasubramanian and Ibrahim (1982), Fischer and Bianchi (1984),
Al-Baharna (1986), Kuronuma and Abe (1986) Asadi and Dehqani Posterudi
(1996), and A'lam (1999a).
However, the most important early work on the Middle East
and specifically on Iran is that of Johann Jakob Heckel (1790-1857), Inspector
at the Imperial Royal Court Collection of Natural History in Vienna. He
described the collections sent by Theodor Kotschy (1813-1866) to Vienna
from "Syria" which includes such places as the Quwayq (= Coic, Kueik or
Kuweiq) and Orontes rivers near Aleppo and Antioch, Damascus, the Jordan
River, Mosul on the Tigris River and Kurdistan (Herzig-Straschil, 1997).
In addition, collections were made in Iran from around Shiraz including
the streams of the Maharlu basin in the Shiraz valley, the Kor River basin
north of Shiraz, the Mand River (= Qarah Aqaj) which drains to the Persian
Gulf and Lake Perishan (= Famur) near Kazerun. (Note that measurements
used by Heckel are the "Wiener Zoll" = 26.34 mm comprising 12 "Linien"
(= 2.195 mm) as opposed to the English inch (= 25.40 mm) from information
courtesy of Dr. Barbara Herzig, Naturhistorisches Museum Wien). Heckel's
descriptions appeared in Joseph Russegger's "Reisen in Europa, Asien und
Afrika" in 1843 (volume 1, part 2) for the "Süsswasser-Fische Syriens"
continued in 1846-1849 as a "Naturhistorischer Anhang" followed by "Die
Fische Persiens gesammelt von Theodor Kotschy" (both in volume 2, part
3). The Syrian collections contained a number of species later found in
Iran. In total 70 species were described or mentioned from "Syria" and
many of the specimens are still to be found in excellent condition in the
Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien. Note that these collections contained numerous
specimens (and still do) while the catalogue in Vienna lists relatively
few, presumably those which Heckel intended to be the type series. Heckel's
publications often do not give accurate counts of the specimens on which
the species is founded. It is not always evident which specimens are types
and the whole series from a type locality is regarded as syntypes.
The dating of Heckel's works is not clear for the "Naturhistorischer
Anhang" and the "Die Fische Persiens..." parts which have 1846-1849 on
the cover. According to the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature
the final date is the correct one if it cannot be demonstrated that parts
of the work have their own dates. The copies of Heckel's works I have seen
(mostly xeroxes) do not seem to have individually dated parts or sections
and so I have used 1849 for the date whereas many earlier authors have
used 1846. This does not have any significant taxonomic complications as
there are no other works with potential synonyms in this date range.
The nominal Iranian species numbered 22 and these too
may be found in Vienna. Of 89 species described from Syria and Iran (two
were deemed to be found in both countries and a third is listed merely
as the trout), 72 were described as new species by Heckel, although all
are not now recognised as valid. Heckel's new species from Iran may be
summarised as follows:-
1. Barbus barbulus
2. Systomus albus var. alpina (= Barbus luteus)
3. Scaphiodon amir (= Capoeta damascina)
4. Scaphiodon niger (= Capoeta damascina)
5. Scaphiodon macrolepis (= Capoeta aculeata)
6. Scaphiodon saadii (= Capoeta damascina)
7. Cyprinion tenuiradius
8. Discognathus crenulatus (= Garra rufa)
9. Alburnus iblis (= Alburnus mossulensis)
10. Alburnus schejtan (= Alburnus mossulensis)
11. Alburnus caudimacula (= Alburnus mossulensis)
12. Alburnus megacephalus (= Alburnus mossulensis)
13. Cobitis persa (= Nemacheilus persa)
14. Acanthopsis linea (= Cobitis linea)
15. Lebias sophiae (= Aphanius sophiae)
16. Lebias punctata (= Aphanius sophiae)
17. Lebias crystallodon (= Aphanius sophiae)
In all, only 6 new species were discovered according to
the modern interpretation of these taxa. In addition the following 22 described from Syria and modern Iraq by Heckel
have since been found in Iran: Acanthobrama marmid, Aspius vorax, Barbus
esocinus, B. grypus, B. kersin, B. lacerta, B. luteus, B. pectoralis, B.
xanthopterus, Capoeta trutta, Alburnus mossulensis, Chondrostoma regium,
Cyprinion kais, C. macrostomus, Garra rufa, G. variabilis, Squalius lepidus,
Nemacheilus frenatus, N. tigris, Silurus triostegus, Aphanius mento
and Liza abu. Heckel therefore described 28 of the species now known
from Iran, the highest proportion of the fauna by a single scientist.
Some of this material was sent on exchange or as gifts
to other museums although it is not always clear in their records whether
the material comprises types, e.g. the Muséum national d'Histoire
naturelle, Paris contains specimens marked from Vienna or Heckel of Alburnus
sellal from Persepolis (sic, possibly a Heckel species re-identified
as sellal)(1638), Chondrostoma regium from Mosul (1635),
Cyprinion kais from Mosul (1641), Cyprinion tenuiradius from
Perse (1640), Garra rufa obtusa from the Tigris (1633), Garra
rufa rufa from the Orontes (1634), and Squalius lepidus from
Mosul (1636). The Museum für Naturkunde, Universität Humboldt, Berlin (ZMB) has some Heckel
types listed as such, plus additional material marked as from the Wiener Museum
with type localities such as Aleppo and Mosul but without dates. Some of these
may also be part of Heckel's material but are not indicated as types in the
catalogue. The Senckenberg Museum, Frankfurt also holds some Heckel material. All this additional material has not been investigated in detail by me
as to type status, although some has been examined in these museums as indicated
in the species descriptions.
At the time Heckel's descriptions came out a series of
22 volumes was being published in Paris covering all the fishes then known.
This work by Baron Georges Léopold Chrétien Frédéric
Dagobert Cuvier (1769-1832) and Achille Valenciennes (1794-1865) appeared
from 1828 to 1849 and was a seminal work in ichthyology, the "Histoire
naturelle des poissons" (see Bauchot et al. (1990) for more details).
It contained new species and summaries of descriptions by other authors
for a total of over 4500 fishes. New species from Iran were collected by
Pierre Martin Rémi Aucher-Éloy (1793-1838), a French botanist
and printer, who travelled extensively in Iran from 1835-1838, eventually
dying at Julfa in Esfahan from "an excess of zeal for natural sciences"
(Jaubert, 1843; Cuvier and Valenciennes, 1828-1849 (1844:298); Bauchot
et al., 1990). In 1835 he travelled from Baghdad to Hamadan, Esfahan,
Tehran and Tabriz and in 1837-1838 he visited Shiraz, Bushehr, Bandar Abbas
and the Bakhtiari mountains. The fishes he collected were Leuciscus
maxillaris (= Alburnus mossulensis), Leuciscus albuloides
(= ? Alburnus chalcoides) and Chondrostoma aculeatum
(= Capoeta aculeata) but collection data were poor, stating only "rivers of Persia".
A similar work was undertaken by Albert Carl Ludwig Gotthilf
Günther (1830-1914) whose "Catalogue of the Fishes of the British
Museum" in 8 volumes appeared from 1859 to 1870 and contained new descriptions
and reviews of earlier works with over 6840 species described and over
1680 doubtful species mentioned. New species from Iran or later found there
were Barbus subquincunciatus, Hemigarra elegans, and Nemacheilus
griffithi. Günther also founded the Zoological Record,
an annual index of the zoological literature.
Several other works appeared between these major, synoptic
works of Heckel, Cuvier and Valenciennes and Günther and the next
major work on Iranian fishes by Berg (1949) and these are outlined below.
Graf Eugen Keyserling joined a scientific expedition in
1858-1859 sent by the Russian Imperial Government to explore Khorasan under
the direction of the acting privy councillor N. Chanikoff. The difficulty
of baggage transport limited the quantity of alcohol Keyserling could carry
and early fish collections spoiled. However he did draw cyprinid fishes
from nature and gave good descriptions of 9 new species and reported 2
others from what is now northwest and western Afghanistan south of Esfahan,
Yazd and Khabis near Kerman. Only one of his new species is now regarded as a distinct species, namely
Squalius latus.
Filippo de Filippi (1814-1867) an Italian zoologist, Professor
at Turin and Director of the Museum (1848-1865), accompanied an Italian
embassy to Persia in 1862 visiting Tabriz, Qazvin, Tehran, Rasht and the
Caspian Sea. His companion the Marquis Giacomo Doria collected fishes as
far south as Shiraz. Seventeen species were described from the Caspian
basin and inland waters of Iran although locality data were poor in some
instances (Coad, 1985). Seven species were described as new of which 2
are still regarded as full species (Acanthalburnus microlepis and
Cobitis aurata).
Albert Günther, referred to above, also described
collections and new species from the borders of Iran presented to the Natural
History Museum (formerly the British Museum (Natural History)), London.
The earliest of these was the collection made by William Henry Colvill
at Baghdad which Günther referred to 9 extant species in 1874, including
a freshwater shark, and 2 new species, Barbus sharpeyi and Macrones
colvillii (= Mystus pelusius). Barbus faoensis (= B.
sharpeyi) was described from Fao (= Faw) in another paper in 1896.
The Afghan Delimitation Commission was dispatched by the British government
to mark the western borders of Afghanistan. J. E. T. Aitchison was appointed
Naturalist and made collections, mostly on the Afghan side of the border,
from Sistan to the Hari Rud which were described in 1889 by Günther.
Seven species were discovered, 3 new, of which only Nemacheilus kessleri
is still recognised as valid. Robert Theodore Günther (1869-1940)
was the first curator of the Lewis Evans Collection (1924) which later
became the Oxford Museum for the History of Science in 1935. In the summer
of 1898 he made collections of a variety of animals and fossils in the
Lake Orumiyeh (= Urmia) basin, including fishes, through the assistance
of the Persian authorities and the Archbishop of Canterbury's Mission to
the Assyrian Christians. These were described by Albert Günther in
1899 and comprised 6 species already described elsewhere and 4 new species
which are still regarded as valid names, with the exception of Leuciscus
gaderanus (= Petroleuciscus ulanus also described in this work).
The papers of R. T. Günther, containing some notes on fishes, were examined
in the New Bodleian Library, University of Oxford in 2007.
Karl Fedorovich Kessler (1815-1881) was a Russian zoologist
who helped organise the St. Petersburg Society of Naturalists in 1868 and
later became its President for 11 years. Kessler worked on fishes of the
Volga River and in 1877 published his important monograph on the "Fishes
of the Aral-Caspian-Pontic Ichthyological Region". Kessler described in
this and earlier works a number of species now found in Iran including
the still valid species Caspiomyzon wagneri, Clupeonella grimmi, Alburnus
filippi, Barbus brachycephalus, Capoeta buhsei (from "Persia", apparently
near Tehran (Berg, 1949)), Chondrostoma oxyrhynchum, Nemacheilus brandti,
N. longicauda, and Pungitius platygaster, plus a number of other
species since synonymised and other valid species reported from the Caspian
Sea basin but not yet recorded from Iran.
Francis Day (1829-1889), Inspector-General of Fisheries
in India and Burma, was the leading nineteenth century ichthyologist of
the Indian subcontinent, attaining this position from his initial career
as a medical officer with the Madras establishment of the East India Company
when fishes were but a hobby. His numerous studies have some items of relevance
to Iran and his 1875-1878 monograph "The Fishes of India" with its 1888
Supplement and the two-volume "Fishes" in the Fauna of British India series
contain useful data and descriptions of over 1400 species.
Henri Emile Sauvage (1844-?) described in 1882 and 1884
the fishes collected by Ernest Chantre of the Lyon Museum on a scientific
expedition to Syria, upper Mesopotamia, Kurdistan and the Caucasus including
several new species from the borders of Iran, namely Silurus chantrei
(= S. triostegus ?) from the Kura River of the Caspian Sea basin
(but Berg (1948-1949) suggests that this species was collected in Syria
or the Tigris basin but without any explanation), Barbus microphthalmus
from the Kura River (= B. mursa) and Labeobarbus euphrati
from the Euphrates River (= B. esocinus).
Oscar von Grimm described two species of herrings (Clupeidae)
from the Volga River at Astrakhan (Alosa kessleri and A. saposchnikowii),
now known also from Iran.
Aleksandr Mikhailovich Nikol'skii (1858-1942) described
in three papers the fishes collected by N. A. Zarudnyi (see below) in Iran.
Nikol'skii was primarily a herpetologist, head of the herpetological department
of the Zoological Museum of the Academy of Sciences in St. Petersburg,
and later professor at Kharkov University in the Ukraine (Adler, 1989).
These included the first record of Channa orientalis from Iran and
the new species Capoeta fusca, Capoeta nudiventris (= C. fusca),
Capoeta gibbosa (= C. capoeta), Aspiostoma zarudnyi (= Schizothorax
zarudnyi), Barbus bampurensis (= C. watsoni), Cyprinion kirmanense
(= C. watsoni), Nemacheilus bampurensis, Nemacheilus sargadensis, Discognathus
(= Garra) rossicus ?
Serghyei Nikolaevich Kamenskii of Kharkov University described
in 1899-1901 "Die Cypriniden der Kaukasusländer" in two volumes which
described a number of new species notably in the genus Barbus since synonymised.
Nikolai Andreevich Borodin (1866-1937) was Chief Specialist
in Fish Culture in the Department of Agriculture and Professor in the Petrograd
Agricultural College and later an exile in the U.S.A., becoming Curator
of Fishes in the Harvard Museum of Comparative Zoology. He wrote a number
of articles on the sturgeons and herrings of the Caspian Sea and discovered
such new species as Acipenser persicus, Alosa braschnikowii,
Clupeonella engrauliformis check others?. In 1908 he co-authored
with E. K. Suvorov "Caspian herrings and their commercial exploitation",
the results of the Caspian Expedition of 1904. Suvorov described Alosa curensis.
Erich Zugmayer (1879-?) collected fishes along the Mekran coast of what is now Pakistani Baluchistan describing, in 1912,
6 freshwater species including 5 new ones from internal and Sea of Oman
basins close to or shared with those of Iran, namely at Panjgur in the
Mashkel (= Mashkid) River drainage and the Dasht River drainage. A later
work (1913) added additional records for Baluchistan. The specimens were
deposited in the Zoological Museum, Munich (Zoologische Staatssammlung, München)
but all fishes were destroyed in World War II on 25 April 1944 (Fritz
Terofal, pers. comm., 1981; Neumann, 2006). None of the species has been collected in Iran.
William Thomas Blanford (1832-1905)(Anonymous, 1905) accompanied
the Persian Boundary Commission in 1872, publishing a two-volume account
in 1876. The Commission mapped the boundary between Persia and Baluchistan.
Major (later Sir) Oliver St. John, with a collector from the Indian Museum,
Calcutta, also made collections from 1869-1871. Fish collections were minor
and not included in Blanford's books. Part of the collections was described
by J. T. Jenkins in 1910 from material deposited in Calcutta. Blanford
and St. John marched from Gwadar through Jalk, Bampur and Kerman to Shiraz,
with Blanford carrying on alone through Esfahan to Tehran. One new species
is from what is now Pakistani Baluchistan, close to the Iranian border
in the Nihing-Dasht drainage (Scaphiodon baluchiorum = Cyprinion watsoni)
while the remaining material, comprising 3 new species of tooth-carps,
is from the neighbourhood of Shiraz. Further discussion about the tangled
nomenclatural history of these little fishes can be found in the relevant species accounts.
(Thomas) Nelson Annandale (1876-1924) was founder and
then Director of the Zoological Survey of India (Anonymous, 1925; Kemp
et al., 1925; Adler, 1989). He and a co-author reviewed the fishes
of Sistan (1920) collected by Colonel Sir A. Henry McMahon and other officers
of the Seistan Arbitration Commission of 1901-1904 and by officers of the
Zoological Survey of India in the winter of 1918. Nine species were described,
one of which, (Nemacheilus macmahoni), formed the basis for a new
genus, Adiposia, since synonymised with Nemacheilus. The
McMahon collection had been examined by Charles Tate Regan (1878-?),
later to be Director of the British Museum (Natural History), London (now
the Natural History Museum) who found 2 new species out of 5 collected
in his 1906 work (Scaphiodon macmahoni (= Cyprinion watsoni)
and Nemacheilus rhadinaeus), by Banawari Lal Chaudhuri of the Indian
Museum, Calcutta in 1909 who reported a new loach (Nemacheilus macmahoni
(= N. rhadinaeus)) and by Annandale in 1919 who described 2 new
species of Discognathus, D. adiscus (= Crossocheilus latius)
and D. phryne (= Garra rossica).
Annandale's co-author on the "Fish of Seistan" was Sunder
Lal Hora (1896-1955) who was to become the leading ichthyologist of India
on a par with Hamilton-Buchanan and Day, and Director of the Zoological Survey of India.
A. Ya. Nedoshivin and B. S. Il'in produced two lengthy
papers in Russian in 1927 and 1929 on fishery capture data for Iranian
waters, forming an important historical record.
Alfons Gabriel and his wife collected fishes in the neighbourhood
of Bandar-e Abbas including the Genu hot spring and the Baschakird Mountains. This material was
described in 1929 by Maximilian Holly of the Naturhistorisches Staatsmuseum in Vienna and contained Cyprinodon
(= Aphanius) ginaonis and Barbus baschakirdi (= Cyprinion
watsoni) from fresh waters.
Viktor Pietschmann (1881-1956), originally Steindachner's
assistant and later (1919-1946) in charge of the fish collection at the
Naturhistorisches Museum Wien, described Mugil pseudotelestes (=
Liza abu) and Glyptothorax steindachneri (identification
uncertain) from the Tigris River basin in Iraq based on materials collected
on the Mesopotamian Expedition in 1910 (Kähsbauer, 1957).
Lev Semenovich Berg (1876-1950) was a leading Soviet physical
geographer and biologist. From 1930 until his death, he was head of the
"Special Laboratory of Ichthyology" of the Zoological Institute of the
Academy of Sciences of the U.S.S.R. in Leningrad and an Academician (Oliva,
1977). His contributions to the ichthyology of the former U.S.S.R. and
to that of Iran appeared in a number of shorter articles and in lengthy
monographs from the late nineteenth century onwards. The shorter works
are listed in the "Bibliography" and include descriptions of such new species
as Alosa sphaerocephala, Barilius mesopotamicus, Alburnus
atropatenae, Garra persica, Nemacheilus cristatus,
Glyptothorax kurdistanicus, Anatirostrum profundorum,
Knipowitschia caucasica and Knipowitschia iljini. His summary work "Freshwater Fishes of the U.S.S.R.
and adjacent countries" was published in 1948-1949 and in English translation
in 1962-1965 and has much of relevance to northern Iran, although the taxonomy
is now dated. His 1940 work on the "Zoogeography of freshwater fish of
the Near East" placed that fauna in context and included Iran but it was
his 1949 work "Freshwater Fishes of Iran and adjacent countries" which
has been the major modern work on Iranian fishes south of the Caspian Sea
basin and the Lake Orumiyeh basin. This was based on collections deposited
in the U.S.S.R. Academy of Sciences Zoological Institute in Leningrad (acronym
ZIL, now St. Petersburg, Russia with the acronym ZISP). The collections
had been made by two Russian biologists. The first of these was Nikolai
Alekseevich Zarudnyi (1859-1919), a zoologist and ornithologist who made
four journeys to Iran for which he was awarded medals and the Przheval'skii
Prize by the Russian Geographical Society. His first journey in 1896 was
to Kuchan, Sistan and Mashhad, his second in 1898 was to eastern Khorasan
and Beluchistan, the third (1900-1901) was to Khorasan, Sistan and Beluchistan
including the Bampur region and the Makran, and the last journey (1903-1904)
was to Gorgan, western Khorasan, western Kuhistan, southern Irak-Ajemi
and Khuzestan. Zarudnyi's material had previously been examined and described
by Nikol'skii (see above). The second biologist was P. V. Nestorov who
worked with the Turko-Persian Demarcation Commission in 1914 and collected
fishes in the Tigris basin along the present Iran-Iraq frontier.
The Zoological Museum of the Lomonosov Moscow State University
(MSU) contains collections from the Caucasus and Transcaucasia including
the Kura River basin and Azerbaijan but none apparently from Iran (Verigina, 1991).
Anton Bruun (1901-1961 - see Spärck (1962))
was the lead author on the description of Iranocypris typhlops, the
Iranian cave fish, later the reason and subject of popular books and articles by
Anthony Smith (see Bibliography).
Relevant works since 1950 can be found in the Bibliography and encompass a
wide range of papers and books of varying quality and utility.
There has been a rapid increase in studies on fishes of Iran, starting in the
1990s. Prior to 1900, this bibliography lists less than 100 publications
relevant to this work, many not strictly on Iranian fishes. On a decadal basis,
it is only in the 1960s that publications exceed 100 and by the 1990s are an
order of magnitude larger.
Several books have appeared in recent years in Farsi on Iranian freshwater
fishes and include "Freshwater Fishes" by Vossughi and Mostajeer (1994),
"Identification of some freshwater fishes of Khuzestan Province" by Najafpour
(1997), "Atlas of Iranian Fishes. Gilan Inland Waters" by Abbasi, Valipour, Talebi Haghighi, Sarpanah and Nezami
(1999), "Freshwater Fishes of Iran" by Mohammadian (1999), "The Inland Water
Fishes of Iran" by Adoli (2000), "A Guide to the Fauna of Iran" by Firouz (2000;
in English as "The Complete Fauna of Iran", 2005), "Iranian sturgeons in the
Caspian Sea (Systematic, biology, artificial propagation, biomass evaluation and
conservation, fishing and production of caviar" by Keyvan (2003),
"Freshwater fishes of Khuzestan Province (Part II)" by Najafpour (2003), "Fish
Species Atlas of South Caspian Sea Basin (Iranian Waters)' by Naderi and Abdoli
(2004), "A Biological Review of Caspian Sturgeons" by Sarafraz and Akbarian
(2005), "Applied Ichthyology" by Hedayatifard and Ramezani (2007) and, in
English, "Fishes of Tehran Province and adjacent areas" by Coad (2008).
A report on water laws and institutions in Iran was authored
by Dezfouli (1996) and gives some background on legislation affecting fish
habitats through regulation of water abstraction and pollution prevention.
Several general works on zoogeography of fishes have encompassed
Iran as part of their study. These include Berg (1933b; 1940), Banarescu
(1960; 1977; 1992b) and Por and Dimentman (1989). Most of Iran is part
of the West Asian area, which includes southern Anatolia, the Levant, and
the Arabian Peninsula, or an Iranian Province which excludes the Caspian
Sea, Lake Orumiyeh and Persian Gulf and Sea of Oman drainages. Berg (1940)
lists the following districts within the Iranian Province: the Tehran District
(= Namak Lake basin here), the Turkmen District (= includes the Tedzhen
or Hari River basin here), the Sistan District (= Sistan basin here), and
a Fars District (= the rest, or the basins Kavir, Esfahan, Yazd, Sirjan, Lake Maharlu, Kor River, Jaz Murian,
Mashkid, Lut, and Bedjestan here). The Caspian Sea drainage is regarded as a separate area. The fauna
is a mixture of elements from the European (western Palaearctic), the Mediterranean,
southern Asia, High Asia and Africa and should be regarded as a transitional
region (various views briefly summarised in Mirza (1994b; 1995)). Zoogeography
is dealt with here in the individual species accounts with some mention
in the drainage basin accounts.
A brief history of Afghanistan ichthyology is given in
Coad (1981d) and Petr (1999), of Pakistan in Mirza (1978) and Bilqees et
al. (1995). Literature, and therefore history, on Turkey is summarised
in Coad and Kuru (1986) and Fricke et al. (2007), and on Iraq and the Tigris-Euphrates basin in Coad
and Al-Hassan (1989). Much of the earlier Russian literature on the Caspian
Sea and adjacent waters is given in Romanov (1955).
Fisheries
Freshwater fisheries are increasing in Iran and with this
exploitation there is a commensurate need for an understanding of the
whole ichthyofauna. Coad and Abdoli (1996) and Coad (1998; 1999)
review the biodiversity of Iranian freshwater fishes. Reviews of
fisheries, including aquaculture, can be found in the magazine Abzeeyan, e.g. Anonymous
(1992c) and Madbaygi (1992), at the Food and Agriculture Organization of the
United Nations website (www.fao.org), at www.agri-jahad.org,
the Iranian ministry concerned with fisheries, at the Caspian Environment Programme
(CEP), Baku, Azerbaijan at www.caspianenvironment.org
and in various articles such as Matinfar and Nikouyan (1995), Nash (1997a,
1997b), Mehrabi (2002), Saeedi (2002) and Alam (no date).
Additional information is found under each species account, in particular for
sturgeons (Acipenseridae), the most valuable fishery.
Fisheries data from various sources (and sometimes the same source) are not always
compatible or comparable. The data should be treated as indicative of trends and
relative fishing pressure between species. Some years may have been inadequately
reported, data is incomplete, sources for figures are disparate, poaching levels have varied, and low numbers may
not reflect actual catches.
Early accounts of fisheries along the
Caspian shore of Iran are given by Nedoshivin and Il'in (1927; 1929).
The freshwater fish catch increased from 6954
tonnes/year in 1974-1976 to 24,613 tonnes/year in 1984-1986, a 254%
increase and five times the world average (Gleick, 1993). Inland fisheries
finfish production was 30,924 tonnes in 1986 and in 1992 Iran
had an inland capture fishery of 40,000 t, as did Turkmenistan;
Kazakhstan had 80,000 t, Uzbekistan 27,439 t, Azerbaijan 36,371 t,
Iraq 4400 t, and Armenia 4500 t (Food and Agriculture Organization,
Rome, Inland Water Resources and Aquaculture Service, Fishery
Resources Division, 1995a). The Caspian Sea fisheries grew from 25,987 t to
98,000 t in the decade 1990-2000 (www.agri-jahad.org,
downloaded 3 November 2003). Saheli (1999) gives figures that show total
aquatic production was dominated by Persian Gulf and Sea of Oman fisheries
in 1995 at 63%, the Caspian Sea occupied 15% and inland waters 15%, the
remainder being from international waters. Petr and Marmulla (2002) give an average catch of
30,000 t for 1995-1999 in inland waters. Kilka was the most important
factor for increased catches in the Caspian and aquaculture in inland fisheries. The catch in 1998 was 75,000 t for
inland waters (IRNA, 15 June 1999) - catch records vary between sources
but give a general idea of the importance of freshwater fisheries. The value of all fish
production in Iran rose to 1046 billion rials in 1996 from 171 billion rials in 1989 (Tehran Times, 27 July 1998). Freshwater landings
increased from 22,177 t in 1985 to 115,000 t in 1994 (Food and
Agriculture Organization, Fisheries Department, 1996). Cold and warm
water fish production was 67,000 t in 2001 with per capita annual
consumption at 5.2 kg. Production was expected to rise to 220,000 t in
2000-2005 (IRNA, 11 November 2001). Per capita yields for
inland capture fisheries in kilogrammes after Food and Agriculture
Organization, Rome, Inland Water Resources and Aquaculture Service,
Fishery Resources Division (1995a) was as follows and shows marked
increases over these years:-
| 1987 |
1988 |
1989 |
1990 |
1991 |
1992 |
| 0.321 |
0.329 |
0.342 |
0.444 |
1.038 |
0.667 |
These values compare with neighbouring countries as follows for the
same period:- Iraq (range 0.182-0.672), Turkey (0.666-0.903),
Afghanistan (0.079-0.102) and Pakistan (0.773-0.874). Per capita supply of
cultured fish was 1.3 kg in 2003 while capture fisheries yielded 5.1 kg (Food
and Agriculture Organization, Fisheries Department, 2006). This same publication
gives fish consumption in kilogrammes per capita as follows:-
| 1969-1971 |
1979-1981 |
1990-1992 |
1995-1997 |
2000-2002 |
| 0.7 |
1.5 |
4.4 |
4.7 |
4.7 |
Catches in the Caspian Sea for 1991 and 1992 were 3036 t and
2692 t of sturgeons respectively, 13,817 and 21,527 t of kilka
(herrings of the genus Clupeonella, family Clupeidae), and
18,571 and 16,873 t of bony fishes. The herring catch reached 51,000 t
in 1994 from none 10 years previously (Food and Agriculture
Organization, Fisheries Department, 1996). The FAO also records that
the silver carp catch went from none in 1989 to 24,720 t in 1994. In
inland waters the catches of warm water fish were 19,947 t and 21,462
t, of cold water fish 579 t and 775 t (both presumably from fish
farming) and from "natural resources" 24,905 t and 20,183 t.
These catches (totals 80,855 t and 83,512 t) are less than the totals
for the marine catches in the Persian Gulf and Sea of Oman at 277,000
t and 271,000 t but are still significant (Abzeeyan, Tehran, 5(9):III, 1995).
In 1996, the total Caspian Sea catch was 58,000 t while the
southern, marine fisheries reached 265,000 t. The gross value of
all catches (1995) including marine fish and shrimps was U.S.$45
million while fish imports were at $65 million. Caviar made up nearly
60% of exports in 1994 and nearly half of imports are fish meal. The
industry had 111,800 primary employees in 1995, including about 8000
fish farmers. Most fish (70%) is eaten fresh, 15% is frozen and
canned, with some smoked or salted and the remainder is made into fish
meal (Food and Agriculture Organization, Fishery Country Profile,
1997, at www.fao.org/waicent/faoinfo/fishery/fcp/irane.htm). In 1998,
the annual fish catch was listed as 65,000 t with the aim of
raising the catch to 110,000 t by the end of the 1995-1999 economic
development plan. It was estimated that 150,000 t could be obtained
from 500,000 ha of ponds and dam reservoirs (IRNA, 23 October 1998).
TACIS (2002) demonstrates the growth in catches in the Caspian Sea basin of
Iran as follows. The kilka catch was 2000 tonnes per year in 1932-1959, 63,300
t/y in 1996-1998, mullets 390 t/y growing to 4560 t/y, and total catch 7440 t/y
to 81,360 t/y. Nezami et al. (2000) gives the following figures for fish
harvested from Caspian coastal provinces in Iran:-
Golestan:-
| Species/Year |
1997-98 |
1998-99 |
| Rutilus frisii |
174,869 kg |
191,680 kg |
| Rutilus rutilus |
20,124 kg |
18.025 kg |
| Mugilidae |
43,016 kg |
229,487 kg |
| Cyprinus carpio |
229,734 kg |
260,890 kg |
| Other |
2712 kg |
10,529 kg |
| Total |
470,455 kg |
710,611 kg |
This province demonstrates a great variation in mullet catch between years.
Mazandaran (1998):-
| Species |
tonnes |
| Cultured fishes |
12,363 |
| Rutilus frisii |
2174 |
| Mugilidae |
1533 |
| Clupeonella (kilka) |
31,583 |
| Other bony fishes |
374 |
| Total |
48,027 |
Gilan (1997):-
| Species |
tonnes |
| Clupeonella (kilka) |
36,077 |
| All bony fishes |
2813 |
| Acipenseridae (sturgeons) |
264 |
| Total |
39,154 |
Unauthorised fishing in Gorgan Bay in the southeastern Caspian was estimated
at 167,681 kg in 2000-2001 (Kamran, 2006). Mullets (Liza aurata and L.
saliens) comprised 35.7% of the catch.
The biomass of fishes in the Iranian Caspian is estimated at 556,530 t,
12.7% of the total for the sea, with a fish density of 50.6 tonnes/nautical mile
(the lowest values of any Caspian state)(Ivanov and Katunin, 2001). The Caspian
Environment Programme (1998) gives the following tables for bony fish production
in the Iranian Caspian Sea (tonnes) in recent years:-
| Year/Species |
Kilka
(Clupeonella spp.) |
Rutilus
frisii |
Mugilidae |
Salmo
trutta |
Cyprinus
carpio |
Sander
lucioperca |
Abramis
brama |
Rutilus
rutilus |
Alosa
pontica |
Silurus
glanis |
Others |
Total |
| 1973 |
1013 |
2.63 |
927.3 |
2.9 |
93.5 |
2.2 |
0.3 |
22.5 |
2 |
6 |
19.2 |
2091.53 |
| 1974 |
1170 |
338.6 |
403.5 |
1.3 |
101.6 |
2.8 |
- |
34.6 |
2 |
10 |
20.6 |
2085 |
| 1975 |
1286 |
695.7 |
963.4 |
1.4 |
84.4 |
9 |
0.3 |
29.5 |
4.5 |
6.5 |
27.8 |
3108.5 |
| 1976 |
900 |
1231.8 |
2004.6 |
1.1 |
47.4 |
6.8 |
2.4 |
94.8 |
5.5 |
5.5 |
33 |
4332.9 |
| 1977 |
1261 |
530.6 |
1297.9 |
1.5 |
40.1 |
11.2 |
1 |
18.6 |
2 |
5 |
36.5 |
3205.4 |
| 1978 |
771 |
191.1 |
373.8 |
0.7 |
13 |
2.8 |
0.06 |
3.6 |
- |
2.5 |
9.8 |
1368.36 |
| 1979 |
836 |
84.1 |
352.4 |
0.6 |
69.6 |
0.4 |
- |
11.9 |
- |
0.1 |
2.6 |
1357.7 |
| 1980 |
619 |
158.2 |
1411.7 |
0.3 |
69.6 |
- |
- |
71.2 |
0.1 |
- |
3.5 |
2333.6 |
| 1981 |
1341 |
252.1 |
408.3 |
0.4 |
129 |
1.6 |
- |
217.4 |
0.4 |
2.5 |
9.7 |
2362.4 |
| 1982 |
798 |
342.3 |
2674.7 |
1.1 |
128.4 |
13.5 |
- |
915.5 |
10.4 |
3.5 |
15.7 |
4903.1 |
| 1983 |
621 |
277.9 |
1637.7 |
0.7 |
160.2 |
4.1 |
- |
108.6 |
1.6 |
3.5 |
16.7 |
2832 |
| 1984 |
1517 |
252.3 |
1219.5 |
1.2 |
173.4 |
3.5 |
- |
384.4 |
20.3 |
3.5 |
17.2 |
3592.3 |
| 1985 |
1828 |
174.5 |
1402.9 |
1.1 |
16.4 |
0.7 |
- |
200.5 |
34.8 |
3.5 |
10 |
3672.4 |
| 1986 |
2450 |
110.4 |
177.2 |
0.7 |
3.4 |
0.16 |
- |
27.4 |
71.9 |
3.5 |
1.7 |
2846.36 |
| 1987 |
4389 |
162.7 |
109 |
0.5 |
19.5 |
0.2 |
- |
6 |
13 |
3.8 |
10.5 |
4714.2 |
| 1988 |
4700 |
5000 |
1750 |
0.5 |
20 |
5 |
0 |
100 |
16 |
3.5 |
105 |
11,700 |
| 1989 |
7902 |
6500 |
2380 |
- |
- |
5 |
- |
130 |
30 |
- |
2068 |
015 |
| 1990 |
8814 |
8500 |
1503 |
110 |
- |
10 |
- |
100 |
30 |
1000 |
3671 |
23,738 |
| 1991 |
13,817 |
12,000 |
2500 |
130 |
- |
100 |
- |
120 |
35 |
1000 |
2686 |
32,388 |
| 1992 |
21,527 |
12,000 |
2200 |
130 |
- |
100 |
20 |
120 |
35 |
1000 |
1445 |
38,577 |
| 1993 |
28,730 |
12,727 |
5135 |
1 |
- |
16 |
17 |
714 |
893 |
670 |
2155 |
51,058 |
| 1994 |
51,000 |
9277 |
2809 |
1 |
- |
95 |
29 |
1366 |
720 |
28 |
2475 |
67,800 |
| 1995 |
41,000 |
8435 |
5014 |
13 |
- |
10 |
5 |
1178 |
490 |
5 |
650 |
56,800 |
| 1996 |
57,000 |
9222 |
2554 |
8 |
- |
6 |
3 |
878 |
330 |
22 |
2477 |
72,500 |
Abdolmalaki and Psuty (2007) give figures over a wide range of years for Iranian coastal catches in the southern Caspian Sea as follows:-
| Catch and frequency |
1927-1936 |
1937-1946 |
1947-1956 |
1957-1966 |
1967-1976 |
1977-1986 |
1987-1996 |
1997-2003 |
| Total recorded catch (t) |
8959 |
7224 |
4986 |
3262 |
5547 |
5384 |
16,903 |
16,201 |
| Sander lucioperca (%) |
29.7 |
1.7 |
1.0 |
0.2 |
0.4 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
| Sturgeon meat + caviar
(%) |
13.4 |
8.8 |
16.3 |
50.9 |
40.9 |
34.2 |
9.4 |
5.0 |
| Cyrpinus carpio
(%) |
9.8 |
8.5 |
1.8 |
2.5 |
2.6 |
1.1 |
6.3 |
6.1 |
| Rutilus frisii kutum
(%) |
12.2 |
43.0 |
24.9 |
25.8 |
17.8 |
19.8 |
53.2 |
45.4 |
| Rutilus rutilus
(%) |
20.7 |
25.5 |
18.8 |
0.7 |
0.8 |
2.3 |
5.8 |
6.1 |
| Alosa spp.
(%) |
1.9 |
6.2 |
14.7 |
2.9 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
3.2 |
3.9 |
| Liza aurata and L. saliens
(%) |
0 |
1.8 |
20.9 |
15.8 |
36.1 |
42.2 |
19.7 |
28.9 |
| Other species
(%) |
12.3 |
4.5 |
1.6 |
1.2 |
1.1 |
0.2 |
2.5 |
4.4 |
The Statistical Center of Iran (www.iranworld.com/Indicators/isc-t023.asp,
downloaded 4 April 2005) gives kilka catches for 1997 as 60,400 t, for 1998
as 85,000 t and for 19919.79 as 95,000 t.
The bony fish catches in the Iranian
Caspian Sea waters for 1999-2000 were given by D. Ghaninejad (5th
International Symposium on Sturgeon, Iranian Fisheries Research Organizatio,
9-13 May 2005, Ramsar). Beach seine cooperatives took 11,170 t and the total
catch, allowing for poaching, was estimated at 16,860 t. The total kutum (Rutilus
frisii) catch was 1400 t and this species had an estimated biomass in
Iranian waters of about 22,000 t. The catch of Liza aurata was estimated
at 3559 t with about 22% undersized and the biomass estimated at 11,100 t.
Cyprinus carpio biomass was very low and was estimated at 4200 t. The
Rutilus rutilus catch was estimated at 1340 t for 2000-2001, mostly poached
with gill nets, and Sander lucioperca at 18 t for the same period, mostly
undersized and immature. The total catch of Abramis brama was estimated to
be 17 t, again undersized and immature.
Catches in the Caspian Sea showed no differences between 7 regions based on
catch-per-unit-effort (cpue) (Mirzajani and Ghaninezhad, 2006). Catches varied
from 88 to 459 kg/cpue for 1991-92 and 31-418 kg/cpue for 1994-95. In 2000-01,
the Anzali region had the highest values, significantly different from the
Astara-Hashtpar and east of Gilan province regions.
Beach seines are known as pareh in Farsi. Beach seine cooperatives increased
from 68 in 1989 to 151 in 2004 while the numbers of fishers doubled from 6000 to
12,000. About 85-100 people are members of each beach seine cooperative. The
beach seines are 1000 m long, with a cod-end 10-15 m wide and 100 m long and
with a mesh size legally fixed at 30 mm (smaller meshes are used too). They are
hauled in by tractors. Although there are minimum sizes for fish retention, e.g.
34 cm fork length for Sander lucioperca, fisheres do retain smaller ones
for home consumption or even marketing (Abdolmalaki and Psuty, 2007). Some
further details on Sander lucioperca catches are given in the
Species Accounts.
Caviar and sturgeon catches from the Statistical Center of Iran (www.iranworld.com/Indicators/isc-t023.asp,
downloaded 4 April 2005) were as follows (note that the Iranian years run
from March to March, so the western years are an approximation here and in the
above table) :-
| Year |
Beluga caviar |
Beluga meat |
Asetra caviar |
Asetra meat |
Sevryuga caviar |
Sevryuga meat |
| 1995 (1374) |
6 |
135 |
68 |
516 |
108 |
512 |
| 1996 (1375) |
7 |
165 |
96 |
669 |
92 |
461 |
| 1997 (1376) |
5 |
126 |
81 |
550 |
65 |
324 |
| 1998 (1377) |
6 |
168 |
92 |
684 |
59 |
348 |
| 1999 (1378) |
4 |
141 |
57 |
569 |
36 |
290 |
The whole fisheries industry, including the Persian Gulf marine fin
fisheries and shellfish, received an investment of 500 billion rials
by government and 800 billion rials by the private sector, apparently
for the period 1989-1993. Nine billion rials were allocated to
aquaculture by the government in 1993, planned to rise to 23 billion
rials in 1994, and to 210 billion rials in the next five-year economic
development plan. In 1995, 200 billion rials were allocated to
preparation and provision of infrastructure activities for fish
farming (http://netiran.com/news/IranNews/html/9503131INEC.html). A
national project to expand fish farming within a six-year period would
raise annual production by 50,000 t, create 30,000 jobs, earn $50
million a year and increase consumption of fish to 10 kg per person (IRNA,
22 January 2000). Consumption of fish in Iran is estimated at 5 kg per
capita, having risen from 1 kg in the decade prior to 1999 and is
expected to rise to 6.5 kg in the next five-year economic plan (by the
year 2000) and to 10 kg by 2004 (later revised to 8.5 kg by 2005 (IRNA,
25 September 2000)). Per capita consumption of fish increased due to
increased production but also a government policy of lower prices than
for meat and poultry (IRNA, 6 March 1999; 31 May 1999). In
1993, 350,000 t of seafood products were produced comprising 30%
of the country's protein requirements and a sevenfold increase over
catches before the Islamic Revolution in 1979 (Abzeeyan,
Tehran, 4(9):VI, 1993). The annual fisheries output was expected to
reach 1 million tons by the year 2004 from a 1999 level of 400,000
tons (IRNA, 6 March 1999). Fish exports were expected to earn
Iran $400 million and create 150,000 jobs by 2004. The 1999-2000
government budget allocated 300 billion rials to fisheries (IRNA,
6 March 1999). In 1998, Rana and Bartley (1998) report the average per
capita fish consumption in Iran to be 4.5 kg, low compared to the
world average of 13.5 kg. The Government's plan is to increase
consumption to 6.5 kg by the year 2020 which would require an increase
in fishery production from 382,000 t in 1995 to 670,000 t; these
amounts conflicting with news reports.
The Caspian Sea at this time produced 60,000 t and other inland
waters 59,000 t. These waters would have production increased to
420,000 t by 2020. Aquaculture has a high priority in this plan and
expanded at 8.2% per year during 1990-1996, the value in 1996 being
U.S.$306.6 million for a production of 30,000 t. However aquaculture
production for 1988 was only exceeded in 1995 (www.fao.org/fi/publ/circular/c886.1/wasia3.asp).
Over 975 million fingerlings were released into the Caspian Sea and
inland waters from hatcheries or given to fish farmers to be cultured
in ponds during the first five-year plan, 1989-1993. During the next
five-year economic plan, the catch was expected to increase to 2.6
million t from 1.309 million t and 1.9 billion fingerlings
would be released (Abzeeyan, Tehran, 4(9):V, 1993). The
"Iranian Fisheries Research and Training Organization" was
expected to have a budget of 35 billion rials by the end of 1993,
indicative of the importance attached to developing fisheries in Iran
(Abzeeyan, Tehran, 4(5):IV, VII, 1993).
Prior to the Islamic Revolution in 1979, the Iranian fisheries were
divided into two companies, known as Shilat in Farsi, a northern one centred on the
Caspian Sea and a southern one centred on the Persian
Gulf. The combined companies, known as the Iranian Fisheries
Organization or Shilat, were under the Jihad-e Sazandegi Ministry,
starting in 1987. Jihad-e Sazandegi translates as "Construction
Crusade" and is indicative of the attempt to develop the
fisheries to serve the growing population of Iran. The Organisation is now known
as Jihad-e Agriculture as of the year 2000. The Iranian
Fisheries Research and Training Organization officially commenced its
activities in 1990 and is now known as the Iranian Fisheries Research
Organization . It has departments of Research, Training,
Scientific Information and Administration and Research Centres at
Bandar Anzali and Sari in the north of Iran and at Bushehr, Bandar
Abbas, Ahvaz, Bandar Lengeh and Chahbahar in the south. A general
account of the fisheries and their organization in Iran is given at
http://netiran.com/press/economy-domestic/html/000000XXDE0090.html which was
available on the net on 14 April 1997 and a more recent version was at
www.netiran.com/php/artp.php?id=1609, downloaded 19 July 2004.
Aquaculture is now of major significance. Demand for fishery products is
expected to outstrip that available from fisheries (Salehi, 2003). Iran is a major producer of Chinese
carps (Billard and Berni, 2004). For the year 1986-1987
aquaculture production was the largest in Southwest Asia and in 1992
at 42,420 t, it represented 50% of the production for West Asia and by
value it was 62% (Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Inland
Water Resources and Aquaculture Service, Fishery Resources Division,
1995b). Yearly cultured fish production climbed from 4753 t in
1985, to 15,000 t in 1986, 18,000 t in 1987, 33,684 t in 1988, 39,913
t in 1989, and to 45,134 t in 1990. In 1995, Iran had 32% of the main
aquaculture production in West Asia (among Turkey, Israel, Iraq and
Syria) although it had been 47% in 1984. The decline was due to a
slower growth rate. The 1995 production was 29,000 t (Shehadeh,
1997). However other sources differ with a freshwater aquaculture
production of 13,615 t for 1995 according to the Food and
Agriculture Organization, Rome, Fisheries Department and Network of
Aquaculture Centres in Asia-Pacific Bangkok (1997). This source
summarises action plans and national objectives for aquaculture. The year
2005-2006 had 96,000 tons of warm and 32,000 tons of cold water production (Iran
Daily, 10 May 2006).
The Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Inland Water Resources and
Aquaculture Service, Fishery Resources Division (1995b) also gives
different figures for a range of years:-
| Year |
1984 |
1985 |
1986 |
1987 |
1988 |
1989 |
1990 |
1991 |
1992 |
| tonnes (t) |
18,369 |
17,776 |
20,930 |
24,820 |
28,900 |
31,000 |
45,134 |
20,226 |
42,420 |
| $U.S. x 1000 |
36,988 |
62,217 |
94,650 |
164,201 |
251,500 |
299,000 |
446,876 |
208,298 |
424,534 |
| % West Asia t |
47.72 |
44.58 |
48.54 |
50.80 |
50.15 |
50.87 |
57.76 |
35.84 |
50.30 |
| % West Asia $ |
33.23 |
44.54 |
51.26 |
63.47 |
63.40 |
66.32 |
71.23 |
49.33 |
62.04 |
The Caspian Environment Programme (1998) gives annual production (in
thousands) of the main cultured fish species in government and private
hatcheries as follows:-
| Year/Species |
Rutilus
frisii |
Acipenseridae |
Cyprinus
carpio |
Salmo
trutta |
Oncorhynchus
mykiss |
Abramis
brama |
Sander
lucioperca |
Total |
| 1978 |
11,857.4 |
3244.8 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
15,102.2 |
| 1979 |
2637.8 |
2911.4 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
5549.2 |
| 1980 |
- |
- |
3003.5 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
3003.5 |
| 1981 |
405 |
2044 |
5 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
2454 |
| 1982 |
280 |
1016.2 |
811.7 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
4637.1(sic)1 |
| 1983 |
- |
25,335.3 |
1028.9 |
2185.8 |
- |
- |
- |
28,550.2(sic)* |
| 1984 |
28,342.2 |
1104.7 |
5036.5 |
- |
570 |
- |
- |
35,053.5(sic)* |
| 1985 |
38,000 |
1132.1 |
12,836.1 |
- |
1804.5 |
- |
- |
53,772.8(sic)* |
| 1986 |
51,704.9 |
2283.6 |
20,831 |
- |
1565.2 |
- |
- |
76,384.8(sic)* |
| 1987 |
72,000 |
3040 |
19,044 |
- |
3012 |
- |
- |
97,096 |
| 1988 |
84,306.7 |
3157.5 |
50,021.9 |
50 |
50 |
- |
- |
138,036.3(sic)2 |
| 1989 |
140,158 |
3149 |
61,176 |
- |
7280 |
- |
- |
211,763 |
| 1990 |
156,268 |
4343 |
93,377 |
155 |
5389 |
66 |
118 |
259,716 |
| 1991 |
109,843 |
6608 |
84,208 |
155 |
4979 |
2275 |
1630 |
209,693(sic)* |
| 1992 |
144,680 |
3457 |
42,709 |
360 |
1834 |
5929 |
2443 |
200,782(sic)3 |
| 1993 |
100,047 |
4176 |
73,321 |
335 |
7401 |
5524 |
1160 |
191,964 |
| 1994 |
142,734 |
6295 |
104,089 |
640 |
8423 |
10,350 |
2888 |
275,418(sic)* |
| 1995 |
117,919 |
9125 |
112,824 |
800 |
11,937 |
11,217 |
2270 |
266,092 |
| 1996 |
142,092 |
12,456 |
130,371 |
424 |
28,940 |
8478 |
2414 |
325,175 |
*Total from CEP (1998), not quite accurate; 1 = 2107.9; 2 = 137,586; 3 = 201,412.
Aquaculture production was expected to reach 110,000 t by 1999
(Abzeeyan, Tehran, 6(8):V, 1995) although reports in 2001
list a figure of 90,000 t. The production target for 2006 was
550,000 t, an increase of 1800% over 1995 (Shehadeh, 1997). These figures
conflict with the ones in the table above*. The following
table from www.agri-jahad.org, downloaded
15 November 2002 gives somewhat different figures for production of aquatic
farms but it is not always clear whether the same values and methods of
organising data are being used:-
| Description/Year |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
| Number of Farms |
3330 |
3647 |
3801 |
4524 |
- |
| Area (ha) |
558,151 |
516,268 |
741,592 |
819,052 |
- |
| Production (tonnes) |
65,000 |
65,000 |
72,000 |
67,800 |
66,000 |
Hosseinzadeh (2003) gives the following figures in tonnes for total fisheries
production in Iran (note that southern waters are marine captures):-
| Year/Area |
Caspian Sea |
Southern Waters |
Inland Waters |
Total |
| 1978 |
3724 |
25,500 |
3219 |
32,443 |
| 1987 |
14,401 |
130,000 |
15,000 |
159,401 |
| 1989 |
21,193 |
239,000 |
40,490 |
300,683 |
| 1990 |
25,978 |
247,000 |
42.040 |
315,018 |
| 1991 |
34,596 |
248,000 |
45,131 |
327,727 |
| 1992 |
40,769 |
271,000 |
42,420 |
354,189 |
| 1993 |
52,768 |
272,000 |
44,123 |
368,891 |
| 1994 |
69,700 |
235,000 |
45,300 |
350,000 |
| 1995 |
58,300 |
265,000 |
59,000 |
382,300 |
| 1996 |
74,100 |
260,920 |
65,000 |
400,020 |
| 1997 |
76,200 |
259,000 |
65,000 |
400,200 |
| 1998 |
101,500 |
226,500 |
72,000 |
400,000 |
| 1999 |
110,000 |
234,200 |
67,800 |
412,000 |
Hosseinzadeh (2003) also gives warmwater fish (major carps, see below)
production by province. Average production (tonnes/ha) increased as follows:
1989 (1 t/ha), 1990 (1.5), 1991 (1.5), 1992 (2.8), 1993 (3.0), 1994 (3.1), 1995
(3.3), 1996 (3.5), 1997 (3.4), 1998 (3.5) and 1999 (3.6). Coldwater fish
production (primarily rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss) was as follows in tonnes:-
| Province/Year |
1989 |
1990 |
1991 |
1992 |
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
| Fars |
219 |
118 |
104 |
148 |
203 |
410 |
350 |
491 |
717 |
1066 |
1174 |
| Tehran |
297 |
302 |
250 |
308 |
283 |
365 |
368 |
495 |
339 |
638 |
691.8 |
| Bakhtiari |
25 |
39.5 |
70 |
70 |
105 |
220 |
271 |
381 |
468 |
707 |
1104.6 |
| Mazandaran |
20 |
57 |
97 |
150 |
140 |
141 |
170 |
196 |
346 |
740 |
844.5 |
| Azarbayjan (west) |
4 |
4 |
30 |
22 |
25 |
104 |
64 |
84 |
108 |
234 |
257.7 |
| Lorestan |
- |
- |
- |
3 |
2 |
11.6 |
11 |
68 |
131 |
319 |
670 |
|
Bovir Ahmadi va Kohkiluyeh |
6 |
9 |
9 |
53 |
45 |
39 |
24 |
52 |
43 |
124 |
239.2 |
| Khorasan |
18 |
17 |
18 |
21 |
32 |
38 |
35 |
38 |
55 |
88 |
174.5 |
| Others |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
39 |
93 |
303 |
1078 |
1876 |
| Total |
589 |
546.5 |
578 |
775 |
835 |
1328.6 |
1332 |
1898 |
2510 |
4994 |
7032 |
| Average (kg/cu m) |
- |
9.5 |
9.5 |
9.5 |
9.3 |
10.3 |
10.7 |
11.2 |
12 |
12 |
- |
The website www.iranseafoodexpo.ir/portion.asp, downloaded 9 February 2006, gives the following production of freshwater fishes,
presumably in tonnes, with some obvious rounding of figures and conflicts with
figures above:-
| Year |
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
| Cold water |
835 |
1200 |
1500 |
1900 |
2510 |
4994 |
7000 |
9000 |
12,170 |
16,026 |
23,137 |
| Warm water |
43,288 |
44,728 |
51,554 |
63,229 |
61,964 |
66,137 |
55,862 |
52,987 |
53,843 |
79,084 |
67,811 |
Carp culture is the most important fisheries subsector according to Salehi
(1999, 2004a). Chinese major carps are reared in hatcheries and, at about 8 days
of age, they are transferred to nursery ponds. At about 10 g in weight they are
transplanted into water bodies or grown out to market size (1 kg) in farm ponds
(Saheli, 1999). Salehi's 1999 thesis gives an economic, marketing and consumer
study of carp culture in Iran in the 1990s, concentrating on Cyprinus carpio.
He maps fish culture facilities and hatcheries, gives production of carps by
species and by provinces, and also gives an overview of Caspian fisheries apart
from carps. However carp culture is more generally used in the sense of the Chinese major carps (Cyprinus carpio,
Hypophthalmichthys molitrix, Ctenopharyngodon idella and
Hypophthalmichthys nobilis, often reared in polyculture. C. idella
commands the highest price followed by H. molitrix with C. carpio
the cheapest. Polyculture stocking in natural and artificial water bodies is
usually 28-32% Cyprinus carpio, 40-50% Hypophthalmichthys molitrix,
5-10% H. nobilis and the rest Ctenopharyngodon idella. Average
yields varied from 43 kg/ha in 1993, to 40 kg/ha in 1994 to 49 kg/ha in 1995.
Higher yields are cited by Salehi (2004a) at 1540 kg/ha in 2001 but this may be
for growth in summer months and special condition. Total carp production was
54,000 t in 2001 (but see below after FAO, also from Salehi). Salehi's data
differ from those of Hosseinzadeh (2003) above. The following figures are in
tonnes:-
| Species/Year |
1991 |
1993 |
1995 |
1997 |
1999 |
2000 |
% growth 1990-2000 |
| Cyprinus carpio |
5502 |
4206 |
6561 |
5435 |
4600 |
7000 |
27 |
| Hypophthalmichthys nobilis |
983 |
1052 |
1269 |
1360 |
1150 |
1500 |
53 |
| Hypophthalmichthys molitrix |
10,019 |
12,619 |
15,228 |
16,310 |
13,800 |
17,000 |
70 |
| Ctenopharyngodon idella |
3143 |
3155 |
3942 |
4078 |
3450 |
2000 |
-36 |
| Total |
19,647 |
21,032 |
27,000 |
27,138 |
23,000 |
27,500 |
40 |
Production by major fish-culturing provinces from Salehi (2004a) for carps is as follows:-
| Province/Year |
1991 |
1993 |
1995 |
1997 |
1999 |
2001 |
% share in 1995 |
% share in 2001 |
| Khuzestan |
9119 |
6019 |
2830 |
12,000 |
4309 |
200 |
11 |
0.8 |
| Gilan |
6689 |
2164 |
1445 |
1360 |
1029 |
1270 |
6 |
4.8 |
| Mazandaran and Golestan |
1958 |
3813 |
8975 |
10,060 |
9518 |
15,700 |
36 |
60.9 |
| Sistan and Baluchestan |
4353 |
3000 |
4600 |
4200 |
11,307 |
0 |
19 |
0 |
| Fars |
216 |
2657 |
1320 |
1450 |
743 |
400 |
5 |
1.5 |
| West Azarbayjan |
875 |
1065 |
1633 |
1800 |
1905 |
2350 |
7 |
9 |
| Others |
1693 |
3539 |
4036 |
3915 |
5007 |
5865 |
16 |
23 |
| Total |
24,903 |
22,257 |
24,836 |
34,785 |
33,818 |
25,785 |
100 |
100 |
New aquaculture developments are reported regularly, e.g. see Abzeeyan,
Tehran, 7(4):IV-VI, 1996; Aavakh-Kismi, 1996). The share of
aquaculture compared with total fisheries production more than doubled
between 1980 and 1987, from 5.5% to 12% due to high private sector
investment while the monetary value climbed from 10.9% to 22.2%.
Aquaculture is concentrated in Gilan, Mazandaran, Khuzestan and
Markazi or Tehran provinces where 96% of the total number of existing
establishments are found and 87% of total production (Ahmadi, 1993).
Various other areas of the country are taking on fish culture plans,
e.g. Anonymous (1991b; www.irna.com/newshtm/eng/08151227.htm, IRNA,
29 July 2000) - Lorestan Province; Anonymous (1992b) - Chahar Mahall
va Bakhtiari Province; Anonymous (1996) - Kermanshahan Province;
Islamic Republic News Agency (19 October 1997) - Ilam Province). In
1992 there were over 8047 ha of ponds and 503,500 ha of natural and
semi-natural reservoirs. Consumption of aquaculture products was 800 g
and over 10,400 people were employed in private sector aquaculture (Emadi,
1993a). The number of warm-water fish farms in 1996 was 3736 with an
area of 7989 ha and the number of cold-water fish farms was 79 with an
area of 164,984 ha (Iranian Fisheries Research and Training
Organization Newsletter, 17:4-5, 1997). Lorestan Province produced
772 t of farmed fish in 1997 with 1000 t predicted for 1998 and a
long-term goal of 21,000 t worth 156 billion rials and 10,000 jobs. In
1997, 50 fish farms were under construction along with 125 pools for
fish culture purposes and 10 billion rials were invested (Tehran
Times, 22 September 1998). Yazd Province produced 36 t of
trout from ponds, 16 t of this from saline water, in 1997. In Dehshir
and Marvast, 250 t were to be cultured with 200 t in salt water. For
1999, 500 t were forecast for this province (Tehran Times, 17
September 1998). The Azadegan Fish Farm south of Ahvaz was scheduled
to produce 70,000 t of cold and warm water fishes annually from
342 pools of 15 or 40 ha, employing 4250 people directly and 13,000
indirectly, and with a gross revenue of 305 billion rials annually (IRNA,
11 November 1998). In the Iranian year ending 20 March 2002, warmwater fish
culture produced 3843 t and coldwater culture 12,169 t (www.irna.com, downloaded
6 November 2002). Confusingly, the warmwater fish production in the year
ending 20 March 2003 was expected to be 30,000 t according to IRNA (17
December 2002), and compare tables above.
The following table from www.agri-jahad.org, downloaded 15 November 2002 shows production of fry of various species in
thousands:-
| Description/Year |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
| Kutum |
142,092 |
154,367 |
143,361 |
147,879 |
147,437 |
| Sturgeons |
12,456 |
21,626 |
24,557 |
18,857 |
18,279 |
| Carps |
130,371 |
113,172 |
33,785 |
99,493 |
116,398 |
| Salmon |
424 |
349 |
510 |
412 |
400 |
| Trout |
28,940 |
28,651 |
75,378 |
71,930 |
115,166 |
| Bream |
8478 |
12,995 |
13,792 |
14,231 |
14,325 |
| Perch (probably zander) |
2414 |
3800 |
3615 |
4257 |
3931 |
| Other |
- |
15,800 |
13,896 |
10,977 |
16,900 |
| Total |
325,175 |
350,760 |
308,894 |
368,036 |
432,836 |
Kutum or whitefish (Rutilus frisii) is very popular in Iran and has
local cultural significance, hence the effort expended. Carps presumably
includes the common carp (Cyprinus carpio) and other major carps (Hypophthalmichthys
spp., Ctenopharyngodon) farmed in numerous localities as is rainbow trout
(Oncorhynchus mykiss) which probably accounts for most, if not all, of
trouts above. The salmon is Salmo trutta, difficult to re-establish its
Caspian Sea migratory stocks because of habitat changes.
Integrated rice-carp farming and trout farming during the post-harvest period
is also being developed. In 1999 rice-field farming yielded 126 t of fish, as
well as fertilising the fields and controlling the rice stem borer (Petr and Marmulla, 2002).
Drought conditions have severely affected fish farming in parts of Iran, e.g.
the warm-water farming in Golestan and Mazandaran provinces which lost $6.5
million in 2006 because of low rainfall and the subsequent drought. Output
shrank by 5000 tons in Mazandaran and 1000 tons in Golestan and projected growth
of 15-20% was not attained. This report, from www.agriculturenews.net, downloaded
2 February 2007, noted that Mazandaran alone accounts for 30% of Iran's farm fish production.
Various studies have been carried out on aquaculture facilities or fish farms
in Iran, aimed at improving the yield and combating problems. For example,
Fathiazad et al. (2002) found clove oil to be a suitable substitute
anaesthetic for MS-222 (which has side effects and 21-day withdrawal period) in
juvenile Cyprinus carpio, Hypophthalmichthys molitrix and
Ctenopharygodon idella; Abtahi et al. (2002) found the LC50
of clove essence was no different from MS-222 for cultivated Acipenser
persicus, Oncorhynchus mykiss and Cyprinus carpio;
Ebrahimzadeh et al. (2003) examined polyculture of female grass carp x
male bighead carp with silver, bighead and common carp (final weight gain was
not different between hybrids and grass carp, for example); Ghomi Marzdashti and
Azari Takami (2004) studied effects of polyculture of silver, common, grass and
bighead carp (only bighead showed increased growth, for example); Safari (2006) sampled bacteria on 51 farms and examined their use in improving
chemical conditions; Esteki (2006) determined the best conditions for manuring fish farms;
Rahmani and Ehsani (2006) studied ion exchange and air stripping methods for
removing ammonium, which can kill fish in culture systems.
Parasites of fishes are common in aquaculture and wild-caught fishes; the
species are detailed in each Species Account. Clostridium botulinum is
present in coastal areas of northern Iran and is a potential food hazard if
preservation is inadequate. Contamination rate was 10% in Sander lucioperca
and 6.66% in Salmo trutta (Tavakoli
and Razavilar, 2003; Tavakoli and Tabatabei, 2005), 2.2% of smoked carp, 1.1% of
fresh carp, 1.1% of smoked kutum and 1.1% of osetr caviar (R. S. E. Khandaghi in
5th International Symposium on Sturgeon, Iranian Fisheries Research
Organization, 9-13 May 2005, Ramsar).
Shariati and Nikfetrat (2005) survey the attitudes of fishermen to stock enhancement and conservation
efforts in Gilan Province and found a significant positive attitude. Overfishing
and illegal fishing were commonly cited as major problems. Emami and Hosseini
(2004) also assessed the participation of fishery cooperatives from Sari in
preserving fish resources. Marketing fish in Iran was discussed at www.shilat.com
(downloaded 28 February 2007) and in Salehi (2006) including such items as product quality,
availability, variety, safety, price control, shelf-life, size control,
consumption behaviour, prices, among others.
Environment
Geography
Iran is the second largest country in Southwest Asia (after
Saudi Arabia with less than 20 freshwater fish species), has an area of
1,648,000 sq km and ranks fourteenth in the world in size, nearly as large
as the British Isles, France, Italy and Spain combined (Firouz et al.,
1970). It lies between latitudes 25°N and 40°N and longitudes 44°E
and 63°E. Its northern border is shared with
the former U.S.S.R. (Armenia (35 km long) and Azerbaijan (611 km) in the
west opposite Iranian Azarbayjan, and Turkmenistan (992 km) in the east
opposite Mazandaran, Golestan and Khorasan) and includes the southern part
of the Caspian "Sea", by far the world's largest lake (436,284 sq km) and
one of the deepest (1025 m). The Iranian coastline extends for 740 km.
The eastern border is shared with Afghanistan (936 km) and Pakistan (909
km). The southern border fronts on the Sea of Oman and the Persian Gulf,
a coastline of 2440 km. The western border is with Iraq (1458 km) in the
south and Turkey (499 km) in the north. Much of Iran lies at an average
altitude of about 1000 m, a feature found only in a few countries world-wide.
Only Khuzestan, the Caspian Sea coast and the Persian Gulf coast form lowlands.
These lowlands are quite narrow, often less than 20 km wide. Mountains
are the most prominent feature of the Iranian landscape. The two major
chains are the Alborz or Elburz, which rim the Caspian Sea basin in the
north, and the Zagros which form a chain down the western side of the country.
Inland of these chains lies the Iranian plateau, which is flanked on the
east and south by lesser chains of mountains. The country has been likened
to a bowl or saucer. This central plateau has extremely high summer temperatures
and often very cold winters. The deserts of this plateau are barren and
among the driest in the world. Rain falls only in winter. The terminal
basins for streams and springs may be dry for years. There are extensive
salt crusts, known as kavirs, over black, slimy mud and large areas are
composed of hard, gravel plains known as dashts, prominently the Dasht-e
Kavir and the Dasht-e Lut. Water is scarce in these regions, often restricted
to small streams and springs. Larger rivers have their source in distant
mountains. Between the Tigris and the Indus, only the Hirmand River on
the Afghanistan border is large enough to be a river on a world scale -
various "rivers" in the intervening area are really small streams easily
fordable on foot for much of the year.
The total renewable water resource of Iran is estimated as 137.5 km3/year.
9 km3/year are through transboundary rivers such as the Hirmand,
Tedzhen and Aras and about 10 km3/year is surface runoff to other
countries notably Iraq. More than 1900 km or 22% of Iran's borders are rivers (Chavoshian
et al., 2005).
Fisher (1968) gives a general, physical geography and
Breckle (1983) gives a general account of the features and life (excepting
fishes) of deserts and semi-deserts in Iran. Barthold (1984) gives an historical
geography of Iran and Yarshater (continuing) has many articles on geographical
features. Geological literature is summarised in Dürkoop et al.
(1979) and Davoudzadeh (1997).
It is pertinent here to interject a note on geographical
names. Transliteration of Farsi place names into English is possible by
more than one system. This results in variant spellings for geographical
features in articles and on maps of Iran. For convenience, I have followed
the official standard names approved by the U.S. Board on Geographic Names.
The Board publishes a gazetteer for Iran with a designation of the geographical
place (e.g. lake, populated place, stream, spring, etc.) and its latitude
and longitude. The latest gazetteer is available from the Defense Mapping
Agency, Combat Support Center, Washington, D.C. 20315-0010. Some literature
localities could not be identified from maps or gazetteers. They are placed
in quotes (".....").
I have not included the diacritical marks used in the
Board's system. They would be of little help to those unfamiliar with Farsi
and perhaps unnecessary to those who are. Needless to say, there are variant
diacritical marking systems and in any case pronunciation varies throughout Iran.
The situation is further complicated by transliterations
into other European languages and readers should be aware of this when
reading non-English papers on Iran or Iranian fishes, e.g. the English
Shiraz is Chiraz in French, and Genu, the type locality of Aphanius
ginaonis, has such variants as Ginau, Genow, Gueno, Geno, and finally
Ginao from the German transliteration, hence the trivial name. As if this
were not enough, the vagaries of political fortune are writ large upon
the face of Iran (which used to be Persia). Bandar-e Pahlavi has reverted
to its older name of Anzali (often spelt Enzeli on older maps), Reza'iyeh
to Orumiyeh (= Urmia in older English literature), and Shahreza to Qumisheh
after the fall of the Pahlavi Dynasty in 1979. Other variants are Bandar-e
Khomeyni (formerly Bandar-e Shahpur), Bakhtaran (formerly Kermanshah),
and Khuninshahr or City of Blood (formerly Khorramshahr or City of Joy,
and again Khorramshahr). I have retained names current for the years 1976-1979
recorded in the Board's gazetteer (1984). One exception is the province
of Hormozgan (or Hormozdgan) which I have preferred for its brevity over
the older name on some maps of Saheli-ye Jazayer va Banader-e Khalij-e
Fars va Darya-ye Oman! The province of Mazandaran is now split into two
with the eastern part termed Golestan, and Khorasan and Markazi have also been
split up. Iranian governments have a distressing
tendency to change the names and borders of provinces.
The provinces used here are as follows, being what existed when the data was
compiled:-
Ardabil
Azarbayjan-e Bakhtari (= Azarbayjan-e Gharbi or West Azarbayjan)
Azarbayjan-e Khavari (= Azarbayjan-e Sharqi or East Azarbayjan)
Gilan
Mazandaran (now split to include Golestan in the east)
Kordestan
Zanjan
Semnan
Khorasan
Kermanshahan (or Bakhtaran)
Hamadan
Markazi (= Central or Tehran; sometimes split into Tehran and a southeast part called Markazi)
Qazvin
Qom
Esfahan
Ilam (or Ilam va Postkuh)
Lorestan
Khuzestan
Chahar Mahall va Bakhtiari
Bovir Ahmadi va Kohkiluyeh (or Boyer Ahmadi-ye Sardsir
va Kohkiluyeh)
Fars
Yazd
Kerman
Bushehr (or Khalij-e Fars)
Hormozgan (or Hormozdgan or Saheli-ye Jazayer va Banader-e Khalij-e Fars va Darya-ye Oman)
Sistan va Baluchestan
Another complication is the tendency for long rivers to
have several names along their course, sometimes taken from the nearest
population centre, and for locally used names to be different from map
or gazetteer names. Names also vary with language and through time. One
of the major rivers of Fars Province appears on maps as the Mand River,
but near Shiraz it is called by its Turkic name Qarah Aqaj (also transliterated
Qara Aghach, Qareh Aghaj, Qara Agach, Qareh Aqaj, Qareh Aqach, Kara Agach,
and Kara Agaj). The Kor River, also in Fars, is known in older papers as
the Araxes River which is not the same as that forming the border between
Iran and the former U.S.S.R. (which anyway is often spelt Aras or Araks!).
The early geological history of Iran and neighbouring
areas has necessarily affected the distribution of fishes, facilitating
dispersal or hindering it, isolating or joining species. Some historical
features are discussed under the appropriate drainage basin descriptions
below or under the relevant genus or species but others are more widespread
and are briefly outlined here. Sources include in particular Wolfart (1987)
but also Harrison (1968), Takin (1972), Falcon (1974), Stöcklin (1968,
1974a, 1974b), Krinsley (1970), Stoneley (1974), Kashfi (1976), Shearman
(1976), Booth (1977), Jackson and Wood (1980), Berberian and King (1981a,
1981b), Haynes (1981), Rögl and Steininger (1984), Šengör (1984), Oosterbroek and Arntzen (1992),
Rögl (1998; Rögl, 1999), and Adams et al. (1999). There have been no cladistic analyses of
taxa on which history can be determined. Zoogeographical analyses are based
on present day distribution and suppositions on relationships.
During the Cretaceous and through the Early Oligocene
the Tethys Sea, several thousand kilometres wide, extended from the Mediterranean
Sea to the Indian Ocean, separating the Afro-Arabian and Eurasian continents.
Afro-Arabia was part of Gondwanaland. The usual assumption is that Iran
belongs to Eurasia, perhaps with Central Iran a microcontinent or island
or as a northern continuation of Arabia, and with East Iran a microcontinent
or peninsula of Eurasia. Förster (1976), however, maintains that Central
Iran, and probably North Iran, were part of Gondwana. The Tethys covered
much of what is now Iran and was a barrier to the movement of freshwater
fishes. The ocean regressed during the Late Oligocene except for a Euphrates-Persian
Gulf furrow and the Zagros and Makran troughs. Continental sediments were
deposited in endorheic basins of Iran. The Tethys closed in the Middle
to Late Miocene as evidenced by mammal migrations between Asia and Africa.
The establishment of continental conditions over Iran has been continuous
since the Late Miocene except for an inundation in the Late Pliocene in
the Zagros trough and the Makran coastal region. There may also have been
an early Miocene connection between Arabia and Iran/Iraq allowing movements
of freshwater fishes (Adams et al., 1999). Iran is therefore composed
of parts of Gondwana, which was the continent south of the Tethys, welded
to the northern continent and parts of the Eurasian plate (such as the
central and eastern Iranian microcontinent). The northeastward movement
of the Arabian Plate caused the closure of the Tethys and led to the folding
which in the Miocene/Pliocene orogenies formed the Zagros Mountains, a
prominent feature of western Iran important in zoogeographic studies of
fishes (see Kashfi (1976) for an opposing view). The Zagros orogeny is
related to the opening of the Red Sea which formed a barrier to fish dispersal.
The Alborz Mountains are a northern part of the Alpine-Himalayan orogen
of which the Zagros are a southern part and started to rise in the upper-lower
Pliocene (Krinsley, 1970; Stöcklin, 1974). A continuous land-bridge
between Eurasia and Africa has been in existence since the upper Miocene,
facilitating freshwater fish dispersal. Hora (1937) and Menon (1957) refer
to wet, marshy, tropical conditions and headwater captures along the whole
southern face of the Himalayas and westwards during the Pliocene and early
Pleistocene facilitating the spread of fishes from the east to Iran. Hora
(1937) and Briggs (1987) consider that cyprinids entered Africa from southeast
Asia 18-16 MYA, in the early Miocene, while other groups moved through
Iran and the Arabian Peninsula beginning in the early Eocene. Kosswig (1951;
1952; 1955a; 1955b) notes the similarity at the generic level between Indian
and African fishes, e.g. the cyprinids Barilius, Garra and
Labeo, indicating that these fishes arrived in Africa from India after the desiccation
of the Syrian-Iranian Sea in the Pliocene. The primary route, according
to Kosswig and to Por (1987), was a northern one around the barrier of
the Persian Gulf and Sea of Oman via northern Arabia, Syria and the Levant.
Cooling conditions in these areas during the Pliocene and especially the
Pleistocene glaciations, and arid climates at times, were unsuitable for
tropical forms. These movements left a selection of fishes in what is now
Iran including the cyprinid Garra, the sisorid catfish
Glyptothorax and the spiny eel Mastacembelus.
The Pleistocene fore-deep of the Himalayas may have had
connections with the Tigris-Euphrates basin which extending down the Persian
Gulf as a river valley. The Tigris-Euphrates basin formed during the Pliocene
and was colonised by primary freshwater fishes no earlier than the late
Pliocene (Krupp, 1983). Movements of fishes into Iran from the west and
north were also affected by the presence of the Tethys Sea and a brief
account is given under the genus Barbus which has been studied in this regard.
The present picture of the Arabian peninsula is of an
arid desert unsupportive of fish life. The presence of fishes in Arabia
and the Levant, and even Africa, with apparent relationships to fishes
from Iran and the east indicate that fishes must once have traversed this
area. Movements of fishes are thought to have been in a northern arc around
the Fertile Crescent or its earlier version. However this modern picture
is perhaps illusory as there is evidence of a more hospitable environment
in the Arabian Peninsula at various times in the past. Wadis were active
during "pluvial" periods of the Pleistocene as evidenced by deposition
of fluvial material (Al-Asfour, 1978). One of these wadis drained much
of central Arabia to the Kuwait area. The "Kuwait River" once ran from
the Hijaz Mountains in western Saudi Arabia northeastwards for about 850
km to drain into the Persian Gulf via a vast delta occupying much of modern
Kuwait. The river was 8 km wide and over 15 m deep along most of its length
(Hamblin, 1987; Anonymous, 1993b). This river last ran between 11,000 and
6,000 years ago and could have provided a highway for fish dispersal. Earlier
rivers of this nature dating to the Late Miocene (Forey and Young, 1999;
Hill and Whybrow, 1999; Friend, 1999), the Pliocene (Gerson, 1982), and
others like it in other parts of the peninsula, as well as shallow lakes
(e.g. Lake Mundafan in the Rub' al Khali at 36,000-17,000 B.P. and again
at 9000-6000 B.P.) would have facilitated transfer of species across the
Arabian Peninsula, today an impassable desert for fishes, e.g. at the height
of the Würm glaciation 40,000 years ago (Chapman, 1971; McClure, 1976;
Al-Sayari and Zötl, 1978; Brice, 1978; Jado and Zötl, 1984; Wagstaff,
1985). A freshwater connection between Iran and Arabia was almost continuous
from 70,000 to 20,000 years B.P. (Krupp, 1983). However no fish remains
have been found in the late Pleistocene lakes although freshwater molluscs
are frequent, Hippopotamus remains are reported and Neolithic fish
hooks have been found in Al Hasa in eastern Saudi Arabia. Incomplete Miocene
freshwater fish fossils are reported from the Jizan basin in the Tihama
north of the Saudi Arabian-Yemen border (Brown, 1970). One was identified
as a Barbus and the other as a Tilapia. Both these identifications
are of such a general nature (see account on the genus Barbus for
example) as to throw little light on past history or relationships with
modern taxa. The Lower Miocene fauna of Al-Sarrar at 15-17 MYA, northwest
of Dhahran in eastern Saudi Arabia, contains pharyngeal teeth thought to
be Barbus, and more interestingly several thought to be Labeo
(Thomas et al., 1982). This latter genus is not now found in the
Middle East but occurs in the Indian subcontinent and Africa. The Late
Miocene Baynunah Fauna of Abu Dhabi in the United Arab Emirates contains
Clarias, Bagrus shuwaiensis and Barbus in a river connected with an
ancestral Tigris-Euphrates system (Forey and Young, 1999). These fossils
tend to confirm the hypothesis that fishes of Asian origin reached Africa
through the Middle East and could have taken what may be termed a southern
route across the Arabian Peninsula. However Forey and Young (1999) point
out that the modern Arabian fauna may not have a history stretching back
to the Miocene but is due more to a re-invasion after a loss of an earlier
fauna. The modern Iranian fauna, in part, may be a remnant of movements
at various times yet to be resolved in the absence of species-level phylogenies.
Climate
The general climate of Iran is based on Bobek (1952),
Ganji (1960, 1968), Taha et al. (1981), "Aquastat" from the Food and
Agriculture Organization, Rome (www.fao.org/ag/agl/aglw/aquastat/iran.htm)
and www.bibliothecapersica.com/articlenavigation/index.html, under ab (= water) and climate,
downloaded 24 December 2004. Kouchoukos et al. (1998) give an overview of climatology for Southwest
Asia based on satellite datasets. Precipitation, its amount, nature and seasonality, is important in determining
the water regime and thus the habitats for fishes. Iran is sparsely vegetated,
both naturally and through the agency of man, and the air temperature and
amount of insolation has a direct effect on water temperatures. Insolation
is continuous through summer days when clouds are a rarity over much of
Iran and the weather remains settled for weeks at a time.
In general, the climate of Iran can be classified as arid
to semi-arid, with more than 80% of the country characterised by less than
250 mm annual rainfall. Mountain ranges block off the interior of Iran
and give extremely continental conditions except for the narrow littoral
zones on the Caspian shore and the Persian Gulf. Summers are hot and dry
with little change from day to day. Three main climatic types are found:
warm, temperate and rainy with a dry summer in the Caspian coastal area,
dry, hot desert in the central plateau, and dry, hot steppe in the rest
of the country. Humidity is generally low because of the altitude, much
of Iran being over 1000 m average height. Coastal regions along the Persian
Gulf have a high humidity, especially in summer. Wind patterns are deflected
by the Zagros and Alborz ranges in the west and north. Summer winds are
mainly north and northwest over much of northern and central Iran and are
hot, dry, and strong for long periods. The Sistan "Wind of 120 Days" from
the northwest blows from the end of May to September continuously and is
very hot, dry and sand-laden. The "shamal" blows from the northwest over
Khuzestan and coastal regions of the Persian Gulf from February to October,
most intensely in summer. These summer winds undoubtedly contribute to
the desiccation and, in some cases, filling-in of water courses. In the
south the winds are west and southwest.
Temperature varies greatly over Iran with latitude and
altitude, as well as with the seasons. Winter lows are found in January
and summer highs in July in general, with the Zagros and Alborz mountains
and the Caspian shore having maximum temperatures in August as a result
of the influence of altitude and the sea. The mean monthly temperatures
for January at 15 selected stations across Iran (Ganji, 1968) had a range
of -1°C to 20°C, average about 8°C. For July these figures are 25 to 37°C,
average 30°C. The annual range is 14C° at Jask on the Sea
of Oman and 30.5C° at Mianeh in East Azarbayjan.
Outside the coastal areas of the Caspian and Gulf, the annual range is
considerable, and daily ranges also are large. Nights can be very cold
in the northeast, less so on the plateau. Some areas, like the Khuzestan
plains, have maximum temperatures over 50°C (53°C at Gatvand near Dezful; possibly over
55°C in the interior, hotter than anywhere else on earth) in summer while in the northwest in winter the temperature
can fall below -30°C (to a low of -36°C at Bijar in Kordestan). Five temperature provinces have been delineated
for Iran: the Caspian zone along the littoral which has a low annual temperature
range; the Persian Gulf zone which has a low annual range but high values;
the Zagros zone with a much higher range than the first two zones and a
very low January mean; the Alborz zone which is similar to the Zagros but
has higher temperatures and a greater range; and the interior zone with
the greatest annual range coupled with relatively high values.
Precipitation falls in winter as snow on the mountains
of the north and west. The highest mountains remain snow-covered year round.
The plateau also receives snow but it does not last long and there is no
snow along the Persian Gulf coast. Rain falls mainly in November to May
with a mean annual of 416 mm, although the Caspian littoral is much higher
and the interior plateau much less. Rain is uncommon from May to October
over most of Iran. Maximum rain is found on the outward slopes of the Alborz
and Zagros ranges where the mean annual rainfall is more than 1200 mm,
1950 mm at Anzali. The plateau has less than 120 mm annually, Sistan less
than 70 mm, and Mirjaveh on the Pakistani border only 48 mm annually. The
Caspian littoral has rain in every month at some localities. The plateau
receives most of its rain in spring, the Caspian in autumn, and the Gulf
coast in winter. The result of this pattern of rainfall is heavy runoff
in spring with silt-laden floods and erosion a feature.
Many streams marked on maps are actually dry for much of the year. Even
a major, interior basin river like the Zayandeh which flows through Esfahan
does not reach its terminal basin for much of the year.
A review of modern and historical floods in Iran can be found in Mazra'eh, News, Analytical
and Educational Monthly, No. 10, January 1998 at www.netiran.com/Htdocs/Clippings/DEconomy/980100XXDE05.html.
Devastating floods occurred in 2001, after several years of drought, in Gilan,
Golestan and Khorasan provinces (IRNA, 11 August, 14 August, 4 September 2001).
Droughts occur and can be devastating for fish habitats.
The drought years 1999-2001 were the worst in 30-40 years and resulted
in a United Nations Technical Mission (see ReliefWeb, 22 August 2000, UN
Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) at
www.reliefweb.int; Foghi, 2004).
Various effects were noted including the drying of 2500 qanats in Yazd,
in southern Fars groundwater became saline, the Latian, Lar and Karaj dams near
Tehran had water reserves of 51 million cu m, down from 173 million cu m for the
same period in the previous year and were within about 2 months of drying up, several lakes and wetlands
of international importance dried out (Bakhtegan-Neyriz and surrounding
wetlands, Hamun-e Saberi, south end of Hamun-e Puzak and Gav Khuni), rivers
dried completely (Hirmand River and its terminal lake), the Dez and Karkheh
rivers in Khuzestan were depleted by 70% in 2001, water rationing was
implemented in Tehran and 30 other cities, and lower water
levels in rivers that retained flow had reduced oxygen affecting fish (IRNA, various
news reports, 2001). In East Azarbayjan, 190 ha of 220 ha used for fish breeding
were useless through drought (IRNA, 29 August 2001). Marshes south of
Lake Orumiyeh near Mahabad encompassing 30,000 ha dried up (IRNA, 25
August 2001). Water reserves behind dams in Khorasan were depleted by 65% in
2001, the precipitation rate having declined by 40% in the period November
2000-August 2001 (IRNA, 3 September 2001).
Abbaspour and Sabetraftar (2005) reviewed Iranian drought cycles and found
arid conditions were experienced for 13 of the previous 23 years. Drought
affected fishes in the drying of wetlands where hundreds of thousands of fish
died, in Sistan 8-12,000 tons of fish were lost as the lakes dried up, in Fars
fish losses were reported from the Kor River, in East Azarbayjan 174 ha of fish
culture farms were damaged, and rivers draining to the Persian Gulf lost fishes
including migratory species.
The nature of the drainages of Iran is directly related
to climate. The Alborz Mountains in the north block movement of moisture
to the south while the Zagros Mountains in the west block moisture from
that direction. The southeast monsoon is almost completely dry before it
reaches eastern Iran. In consequence the best watered parts of Iran lie
on its northern and western fringes and the interior becomes drier from
west to east and north to south. Interior rivers exist in large part because
of mountain ranges which store water as snow, in the case of the Hirmand
River and the Sistan lakes, far removed from Iran.
There has been many studies on past climates in Iran and
neighbouring countries, attempting to link climate with past environmental
conditions in the Late Pleistocene-Holocene. The Early to Middle Pleistocene,
however, is practically unknown for the Middle East and is not dealt with
here (Butzer, 1978). Past environments have significance for fish habitats,
distributions and zoogeography. The brief summary below is based on Butzer
(1957, 1958a, 1958b, 1961, 1975, 1978), Bobek (1959), Whyte (1961), Hutchinson
and Cowgill (1963), van Zeist and Wright (1963), van Zeist (1967), Wright
et al. (1967), Krinsley (1970), Diester-Haass (1973), Turnbull and
Reed (1974), Nützel (1976), van Zeist and Bottema (1977, 1982), Wright
(1977; 1983), Ganji (1978), Neumann and Sigrist (1978), van Zeist and Woldring
(1978), Woosley and Hole (1978), Farrand (1979), Storch (1980), Coad (1980c),
Kay and Johnson (1981), Lamb (1982), Neumann (1993), Qin and Yu (1998);
Griffiths et al. (2001); Stevens et al. (2001); Snyder et al.
(2001); this being by no means an exhaustive listing of the studies in this field
nor is the below a critical assessment of conflicting views. Evidence for
these past environments is taken from a number of studies in different
fields. The Pleistocene ice has been gradually withdrawing from its last
maximum at 20,000 B.P. and the remains of ice fields and glacial moraines
can be used to determine former conditions such as the snowline. The advance
and retreat of deserts and the use and abandonment of settlements are indicative
of changes. Such erosional physical features as dry riverbeds and other
riverine structures, alluvial fans, sand dunes, and aeolian deposits all
give clues to environmental change. The extent and level of lakes and playas
have been widely studied as indicators of climatic fluctuations. Pollen
and other organisms associated with lake sediments can be used to trace
changing conditions and finally historical records can be analyzed.
Glacial deposits in the outward slopes of the Zagros and
Alborz mountains indicate that the snowline was 600-800 m lower than today,
perhaps as much as 1800 m in some areas, and as much as 1500 m at Shir
Kuh near Yazd and Kuh-e Jupar near Kerman in south-central Iran. Lowered
snowlines cannot be explained by temperature alone but were probably due
to much greater precipitation. Winter would have been longer and colder
in the Pleistocene, more snow would accumulate and summers may have been
cloudier. The runoff period would have been longer and river habitats could
have been less prone to desiccation in late summer.
The climate in the Zagros Mountains of the late Quaternary
in Iran has been examined by means of sediment analyses from lakes Zaribar
and Mirabad and for nearby Turkey at Lake Van. Pollen, chemistry, sediments,
diatoms, cladocerans, ostracods and palaeobotany all confirm geological studies.
The last glacial maximum (the Würm) at about 20,000 B.P. led to local glaciation, a depression
in the snow line and absence of trees. The climate was cool and relatively
dry, with less precipitation than today. The cooler temperatures meant
less evaporation, more runoff and filling of intermontane lakes. The Caspian
Sea and Lake Orumiyeh were much larger than today, being 78 m and 55 m
higher. As the glaciers receded, the land environment or life zones moved
up the mountains. The significance of this for fishes is unknown; there
were few trees and the environment may have resembled modern denuded conditions.
There may have been a higher flow than later when trees developed to hold
runoff and before man chopped them down. However bushes could have retained
water and reduced silt load in rivers. By 12-14,000 B.P the evidence from
Zaribar and Mirabad indicates a warming climate but without increased precipitation.
Indeed rainfall may have been less than today, reducing river flows and
perhaps habitats for fishes. This arid period was succeeded by a more humid
period. An increase in precipitation at Lake Van did not take place until
6500 B.P., about 4000 years later than in western Iran. Climate changed
not only through time but also geographically, just as today. Regional
variations mask general statements about earlier climate for Iran and the
outline given here is perhaps best seen as indicative that change occurred.
The humid period was followed by a period of less rainfall, and then in
the late Holocene by an increase in rainfall. The last 3000 years have
been humid with perhaps two, short, arid episodes. Southern Iran may have
been cool and comparatively moist when the highlands were moderately cold
and relatively dry. Climate probably changed markedly over short periods.
Short cold phases are recorded for Europe in the last several thousand
years, e.g. from about 1400 to 1230 B.C., associated with rises in lake
levels. Similar events may occurred in Iran. Barley harvest dates in Babylonia
derived from clay tablets indicate they were 10-20 days earlier in the
period 1800-1650 B.C. and 10-20 days later in 600-400 B.C. It is concluded
that the former period was warmer and the latter cooler than today.
Pluvial conditions as recognised for more northerly areas
of Europe probably did not occur in Iran during the Pleistocene although
summers may have been less dry because of greater cloudiness and lower
temperatures and evaporation. Lake levels were probably higher 18,000-20,000
years ago (Roberts and Wright, 1993). Krinsley (1970), in his study of
playas in Iran, concluded that the climate was semi-arid rather than pluvial
in the period of maximum cold during the Pleistocene. Lakes, which occupied
endorheic basins and could have facilitated local fish movements, dried
up as the climate warmed with the retreat of ice sheets and glaciers and
evaporation exceeded precipitation. These shallow lakes were found along
the inner mountain front or within basins which received greater discharges.
As distance from the mountains increased, there were only intermittent
lakes and finally playas. An immense lake filling much of central Iran,
as proposed by earlier authors, seems unlikely. Generally conditions over
Iran appear to have varied as much, if not more, in the Pleistocene as
they did in recent centuries through the agency of man. Conditions 9000
years ago were probably drier than today (Roberts and Wright, 1993). The
fishes may have been selected for an ability to survive highly variable
conditions in terms of stream flow, temperature, silt load, local fluctuations
in lake levels and salt content, etc.
The greenhouse effect is apparent in Iran, a rise in temperature
caused by various man-made and released gases. Nasrallah and Balling (1993)
show a temperature increase of 0.09-0.23C°/decade, mean 0.18C°/decade, from 1950-1990.
Habitats
The major rivers of Iran drain the two mountain chains which retain
enough snow or collect enough rainfall to ensure a constant and
appreciable flow. All rivers in Iran are fordable on foot when not in
spring flood with the exception of the Aras and Safid rivers of the
Caspian basin, the Hirmand river of Sistan and the large rivers of
Khuzestan. Most rivers marked on maps are in reality small streams,
with very shallow and clear water. There is little vegetation on the
banks, and fishes, if present, can be seen with ease. A significant
proportion of fish habitat is occupied by small streams, springs and
qanats. Large freshwater lakes or marshes are absent except in Sistan, the
Caspian basin and the plains of Khuzestan. Most large lakes on maps
are salty and do not support a fish fauna. A number of dams have been
built and more are planned (see Bagley (1976), Coad (1980c) and "Aquastat"
from the Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome (http://www.fao.org/ag/agl/aglw/aquastat/iran.htm))
and these form important lacustrine habitats. In 1994, 27 storage dams
were in operation with a capacity of 39.2 km3 and a further
24 were under construction with a capacity of 11.5 km3 (see
also below for more on dams). In 2002 Iran was building 68 dams and the
construction of a further 120 dams were being considered as 33% of the country's
water resources were wasted (IRNA, 2 January 2002). Manouchehri and
Mahmoodian (2002) briefly review environmental impacts of dams in Iran.
The streams may have their origin in a mountain, a spring or a
qanat, but they hold in common a clarity of water, a bare pebble bed,
small dimensions (one to a few metres wide and a few centimetres deep)
and often a short course. They may join another stream but are often
lost in marshes, tapped for irrigation and lost in fields or become
absorbed by the friable and porous ground. Many streams are
intermittent, with flow near their mountain source, dry sections and
perhaps a flow near their mid-course, with subsequent absorption into
the ground. Heavy aquatic vegetation is not common and most plant
material is a thin encrusting layer on the bottom. Banks are often bare of
riparian vegetation and streams are fully exposed to insolation.
Summer temperatures are often high as a result (30°C
and more) yet at higher altitudes streams can be icy cold even in
summer and the typical blue-grey of snow-fed water. Spring floods can
be disastrous, scouring out the stream beds and dumping heavy silt loads
(Melville, 1984). Spring fed streams of shorter course are not affected because
they have a small catchment area and may well provide a refuge for
fishes. The clean water of springs attracts human settlement and these
waters are often blocked off to form ponds or cisterns with water led
off through artificial channels subject to drying as requirements
change. Streams and rivers may also be impounded, forming small ponds
or lakes. Bridges often have small pools beneath them and this may be
the deepest (at ca. 1 m) and most shaded section of a stream.
Marsh areas may be associated with springs. Reeds and other
vegetation develop downstream of the source and may be quite
extensive, occupying several square kilometres. Some areas of marsh
are ponded and provide habitat for larger species as well as shelter
for young. Extensive marshes, lakes and lagoons are developed in
Sistan, the Caspian basin and Khuzestan, all fed by major rivers (50+
m wide and 3+ m deep) draining vast areas of land. These areas vary
widely with season and flood dramatically in spring, inundating vast
tracts of land. The rivers and associated marsh-lake complexes provide
the major freshwater food fishing areas in Iran. The Sistan marshes
have been described in Annandale (1921) and Annandale and Hora (1920),
the Caspian shore by Schüz (1959) and the lowlands of southern Iraq
by Rzóska (1980) and by Thesiger (1985) and Young (1989).
Conservation of aquatic habitats in Iran has been part of a general
programme for biotic conservation summarised in Firouz (1974; 1976),
Firouz and Harrington (1976), Ashtiani-Zarandi (1990) and Kahrom (2000). The Ramsar
Convention on Wetlands of International Importance was named after the
city of Ramsar in northern Iran where the first conference was held in
January 1971. Iran has more Ramsar listed sites than any other country
in Southwest Asia (Scott, 1993). In 1977 there were 11 Park-e Melli
(National Parks), 4 Asar-e Tabii Melli (National Nature Monuments), 24
Manatgheh-Hefazat Shodeh (Protected Regions or Areas) and 31 Panahgah-e
hayat-e Vahsh (Wildlife Refuges) offering varying degrees of
protection to the fish fauna (Firouz et al., 1970; Yachkaschi,
1976; Köpp and Yachkaschi, 1978; Majnunian, 1985). The 1993 United
Nations List of National Parks and Protected Areas at "www.wcmc.org.uk/data/database/un_combo.html
lists" 7 National Parks, 2 National Nature Monuments, 41 Protected
Areas and 18 Wildlife Refuges and the National Report of the
Islamic Republic of Iran for the Convention on Biological Diversity
(Department of the Environment, Tehran) lists 11 National Parks, 47
Protected Areas, 25 Wildlife Refuges, 5 National Nature Monuments, 9
MAB (Man and Biosphere) Sites and 20 Ramsar Sites.
Seven Ramsar sites are priorities for urgent action with the
causes, namely:- Alagol, Ulmagol and Ajigol lakes (impact of
agricultural development), the Anzali Mordab (Talab) complex (falling
water levels and increased eutrophication leading to the rapid spread
of the reed Phragmites australis, south end of Hamun-e Puzak
(water inflow could be reduced because of dam construction in
Afghanistan), Hamun-e Saberi and Hamun-e Hirmand (dam construction in
Afghanistan), Neyriz lakes and Kamjan Marshes (drought and
agricultural activities), Shadegan Marshes and mudflats of Khor al
Amaya and Khor Musa (chemical pollution from the Iran-Iraq war), and
Shurgol, Yadegarlu and Dorgeh Sangi lakes (war and drought effects) (www.ramsar.org/ram_rpt_37e.htm,
downloaded 28 July 2000).
The status of the fish fauna in Iran was assessed by Coad (1980c)
and compared with other areas by Moyle and Leidy in Fiedler and Jain
(1992). The percentage of the total fauna under some form of threat
was assessed at 22%, a figure which was lower than most other areas examined.
Iran has several unusual habitats for fishes and these are described below.
i) Hot springs
A number of hot springs are reported from Iran (Waring, 1965;
Joneidi et al., 1971?; www.bibliothecapersica.com/articlenavigation/index.html, under ab-e garm,
downloaded 24 December 2004). Some of the hot springs marked on
maps are not hot, e.g. the spring at Tafresh (ca. 34°44'N, 50°02'E) was only 19°C
(and fishless). Some springs produce water at relatively high
temperatures, but since these temperatures are also seen in nearby
streams they are not regarded as "hot", e.g. a spring near Farrashband (28°53'N, 52°06'E)
at 30°C.
Only the true hot spring at Genu (27º26'N, 56º20'E)
is known to contain fish including Aphanius ginaonis, Cyprinion
watsoni and Garra persica (Coad, 1980b). A hot spring on
the slopes of Kuh-e Bazman (the mountain is at 28°04'N, 60°01'E) is rumoured to contain
tooth-carps (Cyprinodontidae).
The Ab-e Garm (literally hot water) at Genu emerges at 41°C
and was partially enclosed by brickwork associated with a hammam or
bath-house. The altitude of the spring is about 400 m. Its stream is
10-15 m wide near the source and the bed is composed of stones and
pebbles covered by lime-green algal mats and strings. Only Aphanius
ginaonis was found at the hot spring, not in the main flow but
along the stream margins and in many minor subsidiary springs which
emerge a few metres from the main spring. These minor springs had a
mud bottom, were as shallow as 1 cm and had soap and food debris
pollution in 1977. Side springs and stream margin near the source were
37-40ºC. The other species (along with A.
ginaonis) were found below a cascade and have no access to the
hotter parts of the spring and stream. A. dispar is recorded
from the spring by Werner (1929) but this has not been confirmed by my
collections. The water is clear and colourless, but there is a strong
smell of sulphur. Flow is 30 l/sec. The chemistry of this spring as
given by Joneidi et al. (1971?) was : pH = 6.2, conductivity
14,000 us, dry residue at 180ºC = 9933 mg/l, H2S = 34 (? p.p.b.), r (reacting value) Ca = 22.4, r
Mg = 9.9, r Na + K = 6.1, total cations 162.1 (sic), r Cl =
147, r SO4 = 15.4, r HCO3 = 4.6, total anions =
166 (sic), SiO2 = 10 mg/l, NH4 = 0.7 (no
units given), NO3 = 22 (no units given). There were traces
of CO2 and no measurable Fe, NO2, or CO3.
The hot spring lies in the Genu Protected Area (Biosphere Reserve)
which is described by Zehzad et al. (1997).
ii) Caves
Iran is replete with caves but thus far only one has been found to
contain a fish fauna. This cave lies about 12 km north of the railway
station Tang-e Haft in Lorestan at 33°05'N, 48°36'E. Two species are found here, Iranocypris
typhlops (Cyprinidae) and Nemacheilus smithi (Balitoridae)
(Bruun and Kaiser, 1944; Movaghar, 1973; Greenwood, 1976; Smith, 1978; 1979;
Coad, 1996c; Proudlove, 2001; Romero and Paulson, 2001). The cave lies in the Dez River drainage of the Tigris River
basin and its connection to nearby surface water is intermittent. The
cave is the surface outlet of a subterranean limestone system and the
captures may represent strays from underground. B. Sandford (pers.
comm., 1979) stated that there is some evidence of recent collapse in
the cave system and thus the habitat may be endangered but it is
difficult to assess the extent and nature of underground fissures in the rock.
iii) Qanats
Qanats are an unusual yet important habitat for fishes in Iran. An
account of their fishes with an extensive bibliography is given in
Coad (1996h); additional literature on this unique environment not
referenced there includes Kuros (1943), Aisenstein (1947), Feylessoufi
(1959), Nesbitt and Bawa (1960; 1961), de Menasce (1966), Jentsch
(1970), Nadji (1970; 1972a; 1972b), Braun (1974), Goblot (1979), Hartl
(1979), Sajjadi (1982), Goldsmith and Hildyard (1984), Behnia (1988), McLachlan
(1988), Beaumont et al. (1989), Harwit (1990), Razavi (1991), Coad (1994b),
Koocheki (1996), Liaqati (1997), Salim Manshadi et al. (1997), Afkhami
(1998), English (1998), Aminpouri (2002),
www.netiran.com/Htdocs/Clippings/DEconomy/200629XXDE05.html, downloaded 8 August 2002), Foltz (2002),
Floor (2003), Wessels and Hoogeveen (2003), and qanats at www.waterhistory.org,
and at www.bibliothecapersica.com/articlenavigation/index.html, under abyari
(irrigation), downloaded 24 December 2004.
The word qanat has various suggested origins including a derivation
from the Akkadian for "reed" according to Goblot (1979) in
contrast to others listed in Coad (1996h).
Over 20% of the irrigated area of Iran is fed by qanats (Redding
and Midlen, 1991) and numbers as high as 60,000 have been estimated.
They are essentially horizontal wells which tap groundwater and
provide a continual, low gradient flow of fresh water. Qanats are an
advantageous habitat for fishes in several ways. The water temperature
is not subject to the extremes found in natural waters, shade within
the qanat provides protection against predators on adults, young and
eggs and against insolation, the gradient and water flow are gentle,
and a certain amount of food is provided by kitchen scraps since
dishes, cooking containers and implements are washed in the jube or channel
and food is cleaned and trimmed there. A school of fish will quickly
gather at a washing site and maintain station in clouds of detergent
in order to pick up scraps of food. Attempts to imitate washing
movements will attract fish momentarily but they soon dart off when no
food is forthcoming. The garden environment with trees and other
vegetation provides shade, energy input from leaf fall and garbage
items, and facilitates development of an invertebrate fauna as a food
source. Aufwuchs on rock surfaces provide a food source along with the
associated invertebrate fauna. The Zoroastrian community, once
widespread in Iran, has a ceremony known as com-e mahi or
"meal for the fishes" in which bread and dried fruit are
thrown into running water as a libation (Boyce, 1977). Feeding of
scraps to fish is also seen in Moslem communities and boys regularly
attempt to attract and catch fish using any available food material
and primitive fishing gear (personal observations; Edwards, 1971).
Qanats are now rapidly being replaced by pump-wells which are
faster and easier to excavate but do not provide fish habitat.
Pump-wells often dry up qanats and natural springs by lowering the
water table (Razavi, 1991; Anonymous, 2001b; Aminpouri, 2002). Also schemes to restrict water
flow from qanats for conservation reasons will presumably affect the available
habitat for fishes (Salim Manshadi et al., 1997).
The qanat fishes comprised 25 species in Coad's study (1996h), 40%
of the fauna on the plateau of Iran. The number of species per qanat
ranges from 1 to 6 although 88% of qanats have only 1-2 species. Areas
with little surface water and low in diversity have 94% of the species
occurring in qanats while better-watered areas with more diversity
have only 29% of species in qanats. The qanat fauna is dominated by
the Cyprinidae, which comprises 76% of the ichthyofauna. The qanat
fauna is a subset of the basin in which the qanat occurs, comprising
small species, broadcast spawners, lacking in specialised food
requirements (usually scrapers of aufwuchs or feeding on
invertebrates), non-migratory, and widely tolerant of environmental conditions.
The fishes in qanats are caught by local people for food but given
the restricted size of this habitat and of most fishes found in them,
this is not a significant dietary item. In the seventeenth century
qanat fishes "were not esteemed as they never saw the light and
were used only for medicinal purposes to cause vomiting" (Ferrier,
1996, quoting Jean Chardin). In the 1950s villagers in Iran believed that qanat
fish lived forever and needed no food, only their own eggs (www.iras.ucalgary.ca/~volk/sylvia/qanat.htm,
downloaded 24 June 2002).
Colonisation is both natural, since loaches are unlikely to be seen
and caught by local people, and deliberate, since larger cyprinids are
found in qanats remote from any surface water. These fish are hardy,
already living in high temperature environments, and are easily
transported for Now Ruz celebrations. At the Zard-Abieh qanat in
Shahrud, a local man remembered putting fish into the qanat 60 years
ago from one now dry (H. Rahimian, pers. comm., 2000).
iv) Salt streams and lakes
Salt lakes are common in Iran and are mostly too saline to support
a fish fauna. They are discussed in a world context by Williams
(1996). Fishes do exist in tributary streams (which may be saline in
varying degrees). Rivers and springs around salt lakes are therefore
isolated from one another and might be expected to give rise to unique
populations of fishes. However all these salt lakes are shallow and
liable to desiccate such that tributary streams and springs can
connect and allow faunal interchanges once the lake level falls.
Many streams in Iran are highly mineralized or even salt to taste
yet these support fishes which are usually regarded, at least at the
family level, as salt intolerant. Salinity tolerance studies have not
been carried out on Iranian fishes. The Caspian Sea is at one-third
sea water (12-13‰) yet typical "fresh" water species can
be found there, e.g. Cyprinus carpio.
v) Sacred waters
A number of springs in Iran are said to be "sacred" and
their fish then attain a degree of importance on account of their
inaccessibility to ichthyologists. Howz or tanks at Qumisheh (32°01'N, 51°52'E) were supposed to hold sacred
fish, decorated with gold rings, according to John Fryer in 1698 and
John Chardin in 1711, but G. N. Curzon in 1892 mentioned that the gold
rings were gone and by 1978 so were the fish. A sacred tank or
artificial reservoir at Soh contained fish deemed to be holy. Visitors
were expected to purchase bread to feed these fishes (Anderson, 1880).
The most important "sacred" fish are those of Sa'di's
Tomb in Shiraz (29°37'N, 52°35'E) which were described by Heckel (1849b) as new species Scaphiodon
saadii (= Capoeta damascina) and Discognathus crenulatus
(= Garra rufa). The water is a stream (?qanat) under the tomb and part is
expanded into a hawz-e mahi or fish pond. Fish have been present here since at least the
early nineteenth century as they are mentioned briefly by Waring
(1807). Official permission was gained to collect fishes in Sa'di's
tomb for study but sampling was actively discouraged by local people.
Sa'di was supposed to punish any killing of these fishes with death
but the traveller Chardin was able to catch some to eat by monetary
means. Some of these fish too were reputedly decorated with gold rings
(Ouseley, 1819-1823); regrettably my captures were not.
vi) Mordab
A mordab is a fresh or brackish water lagoon area found along the
Caspian Sea coast (literally "dead water", the Russian
equivalent is liman). The Anzali Mordab at 37°26'N, 49°25'E is the best known (Firouz, 1968b)
and was formerly called the Pahlavi Mordab. The more modern term is
"talab" (= pool or marsh, which lacks the association with
death) but the older literature refers to mordab and the term is still
in common use. The Anzali Mordab is about 30 km long and 4-8 km wide
with clear water of only 1.5 m average depth. Much of the area is
covered by Phragmites reeds and other plants and only about 15%
is open water. Variations in Caspian Sea level and water abstraction
from feeder streams will affect the mordab level and size. In the
1930s the mordab was 4 to 8 m deep (Vladykov, 1964) and the fall in
level has severely affected the spawning migrations of fishes and the
habitat for developing young. The mordab is the principal breeding
ground for Rutilus frisii kutum and is also important for
several other species. Further details are given below under the
description of the Caspian Sea basin.
vii) Wetlands
Wetlands were originally studied and protected as feeding and
overwintering grounds for important waterfowl but they do protect fish
populations which might otherwise be threatened. Access and hunting is
forbidden or restricted and often fishing too. Anonymous (1971), Carp
(1972) and Dugan (1993) list and describe various wetlands in Iran of
international importance principally:-
See also Scott (1995) where latitude-longitudes are often slightly different.
Lower Atrak River and Alagol Lake (37°21'N, 54°35'E)
Farahabad and Larim Sahra (36°45'N, 53°05'E)
Zarrin Kola (36°43'N, 53°00'E)
Bisheh Sar (36°36'N, 52°43'E)
Fereydun Kenar (36°40'N, 52°31'E)
Bandar-e Farahnaz Lagoon (37°25'N, 49°57'E)
Khalij-e Gorgan (36°50'N, 53°40'E)
Anzali Mordab (37°25'N, 49°30'E)
Nur Gol (38°00'N, 48°33'E)
Neyriz Lakes (29°30'N, 53°40'E)
Lake Parishan (Famur)(29°26'N, 51°50'E)
Khuzestan Marshes (30°30'N, 49°30'E)
Dasht-e Arjan (29°35'N, 52°00'E)
Lake Kopibalbalch, Hassanlu Marsh, Yadergarlu Marsh and surrounding marshes (37°00'N, 45°30'E)
Lake Bishovan (37°09'N, 54°52'E)
Amirkelayeh (37°17'N, 50°12'E)
Coastal lagoons north of Gomishan (37°15'N, 54°00'E)
Seyed Mahalleh (36°45'N, 53°00'E)
Sistan lowlands (31°00'N, 61°10'E)
Additional wetlands not of international importance were listed as follows:-
Safid Rud Reservoir (36°45'N, 49°24'E)
Astara (38°25'N, 48°50'E)
Bahr-e Zaribar (35°32'N, 46°07'E)
Soltanabad Marshes (29°30'N, 52°35'E)
Lake Maharlu (29°30'N, 52°50'E)
Dasht-e Mogan (39°30'N, 47°30'E)
Araxes River (39°10'N, 45°20'E)
Agh Gol (39°55'N, 44°47'E)
Rud-e Shur (35º50'N, 50°25'E)
Zarghan and Lapu'i Marshes (29°50'N, 52°50'E)
Other wetlands are mentioned in the appropriate drainage basin account.
Environmental Change
There is evidence for changes in the environment and therefore fish habitats during historical times. Many
of these changes are man-made and are on-going. References to change, e.g.
habitat loss, pollution, effects of exotic species, etc., can be found in each of the Drainage Basin files.
This topic has been reviewed in general by Coad (1980c) and the references therein, with papers cited under
Climate, are relevant.
Peritore (1999) gives a general overview of ecological conditions and
attitudes to the environment, Foltz (2001) reviews environmental initiatives, Afasiabi (2003) reviews the
environmental movement in Iran and Valeolahy (2000) reviews the factors
affecting the abundance of fishes and suggests measures for conservation. Jawad (2003) gives an account of the
impact of environmental change on Iraqi fishes which has implications for fishes
in neighbouring waters of Iran.
Drainage Basins
The drainage basins of Iran are shown in the Figure. The delimitation
of these basins is somewhat arbitrary. Iran is a mountainous country
and much of it is desert. There are thousands of small springs and
streams with no present or recent connection to other water bodies.
Practical considerations require a large scale and I have divided the
country into 19 major basins based on field work, maps, fish
distributions, history of research, works on hydrography and areas
deemed important for an understanding of zoogeography. The basins are as follows
and are linked:-
Exorheic Basins:-
Gulf
Hormozgan
Makran
Tigris River
Endorheic Basins:-
Bejestan_Highland
Caspian Sea
Dasht-e Kavir
Dasht-e Lut
Esfahan
Hamun-e Jaz Murian
Hamun-e Mashkid
Kor River
Lake Maharlu
Lake Orumiyeh
Namak Lake
Sirjan
Sistan
Tedzhen River
Yazd
There are two main types of basin, exorheic where the rivers and lakes drain to the sea and endorheic,
where rivers drain to an internal basin such as a lake, or are lost in
the desert, and have no connection with the sea. The exorheic basins
all fringe the southern part of Iran. The bulk of the basins, in
number (15) and area (about 78.1% of Iran), are endorheic. These
plateau basins lie at an average altitude of 800 m, alternating with
mountains ridges at an average of 2000 m. The salt lakes and flats of
these basins are fed primarily by groundwater rather than rain (Issar,
1967) and water is lost by evaporation. Wolfart (1987) makes the
valuable point that Quaternary environments in the closed or endorheic
basins of arid Southwest Asia often have marine and brackish fossils.
These are not evidence of marine invasions but of the increasing
salinity derived from the mineral content of rainwater. As the water
evaporates it leaves behind the minerals and over ten thousand years
or less a saline environment develops.
www.bibliothecapersica.com/articlenavigation/index.html, under drainage,
downloaded 24 December 2004 gives four main drainages for Iran as follows:-
| Drainage |
Area (sq km) |
% |
| Caspian Sea |
193,161 |
11.9 |
| Lake Orumiyeh |
54,747 |
3.4 |
| Persian Gulf |
335,864 |
21.9 |
| Interior |
1,626,520 |
61.8 |
| Total |
2,210,292 |
100 |
with the interior drainages as follows:-
| Drainage |
Area (sq km) |
% |
| Qom (Namak Lake) |
92,332 |
9.0 |
| Damghan |
19,863 |
1.9 |
| Dasht-e Kavir |
200,747 |
19.6 |
| Mashhad (Tedzhen River or Hari Rud) |
43,496 |
4.3 |
| Bejestan Highlands |
91,349 |
8.9 |
| Dasht-e Lut |
166,160 |
16.2 |
| Sistan |
90,813 |
8.9 |
| Jaz Murian |
75,193 |
7.4 |
| Yazd |
105,291 |
10.3 |
| Esfahan |
97,802 |
9.6 |
| Zagros Mountains (Tigris River) |
39,702 |
3.9 |
| Total |
1,022,748 |
100 |
Van der Leeden (1975) summarises water resources of Iran with
discharges of principal rivers at various recording stations, lists of
major dams and reservoirs, and resources and demand.
www.bibliothecapersica.com/articlenavigation/index.html, under ab (= water),
downloaded 24 December 2004 also lists major dams and gives a general overview
of hydrology and has descriptions of various rivers under their names. McLachlan (1988)
also considers water resources in Iran. Some of the earlier dam
projects are described by Justin and Taleghani (1955). Later dam
projects can be located by a search at "Netiran.com". Prior to
the Islamic Revolution 13 dams had been built in Iran but the
five-year development plan (1990-1995) designed 110 dams of which 22
were under construction in 1993. 60 dams have been constructed after
the 1979 revolution (IRNA, 31 August 1998).
"Aquastat" from the Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome (www.fao.org/ag/agl/aglw/aquastat/iran.htm) gives an
overview of Iranian water resources and water abstraction and is
updated at intervals. The total domestic, industrial and agricultural
water abstraction was estimated at 70 km3 in 1993, 51% of
the renewable water resources. Annual abstraction from aquifers (57 km3)
is more than the estimated safe yield of 46 km3. An
additional 39 km3 is used annually, 20 km3 for
electricity production, 11 km3 for flood control and 2 km3
for control and thence environmental protection of downstream parts of
rivers, the remainder being surplus. The increasing demands will have
serious effects on the water supply and hence the fish fauna.
Nikravesh (1997) estimates, based on water consumption and population
growth, that Iran will be added to the U.N. list of countries facing
water shortages in the year 2025.
Kuros (1943) gives accounts of historical water resources and the
problems of water supplies in Iran. Lambton (1953) gives an account of
the allocation of water resources in Iran for irrigation. This latter
work is important for an understanding of restrictions on fish
habitats, e.g. in qanats, reservoirs, rivers and springs. Beaumont
(1981) reviews management of water resources in the Middle East and
places the Iranian resources in a wider context. Anonymous (1961c) and
Beaumont (1974) outline water resource development in Iran, the
construction of dams, abstraction for irrigation by traditional and
modern means, and the demands of industry and domestic consumers of
water. All these affect the habitat of fishes, often in deleterious
ways. Noori (1966) describes the hydrology of surface water in Iran.
Pirnia (1951), Anonymous (1961c) and Beaumont (1973b) give accounts of
the river regimes in Iran with discharges and runoffs at various
recording stations. Peak discharges occur in March to May because of
snowmelt. Very low flows occur in summer because of the lack of
precipitation, and because of abstraction for irrigation, and flow is
mostly from groundwater sources. Most rivers are really streams for
much of the year as minimum flows for principal rivers are 0.16-451 cu
m/sec, average about 36 cu m/sec. The Caspian rivers are the only ones
which lack a distinctive annual rhythm and show flows closely related
to precipitation throughout the year. The areas with the largest
runoff values are in the northern and central Zagros Mountains and in
the Alborz Mountains while lowest runoff values per unit area are
found around the deserts in central Iran. In the Zagros and Alborz,
annual runoff values can attain more than 300,000 cu m per sq km.
Löffler (1956; 1961) studied the limnology of several of the major
basins within Iran. The Ramsar Convention on Wetlands has a report on the
Islamic Republic of Iran (No. 37, at www.ramsar.org/ram_rpt_37e.htm, downloaded 4 May 2001).
Peritore (1999) gives a general overview of ecological
conditions and attitudes to the environment in Iran. Zohary (1963) gives a general account of the
vegetation of Iran. A general description of Iran, its structure and
drainage can be found in Harrison et al. (1945), Neumann
(1953), Fisher (1968) and Krinsley (1970). Water policy development is
summarised in Aminipouri (2002). A description of natural areas in
Iran, including a list of National Parks and Protected Rivers, can be found in
Zehzad et al. (2002). The Protected rivers are the Jajrud and Karaj in
the Namak Lake basin, and the Chalus, Sardab, Lar and Haraz rivers of the
Caspian Sea basin.
Exorheic Basins
Gulf
This basin comprises rivers which drain the southern Zagros
Mountains to the head of the Persian Gulf, but which are not now
tributaries of the Tigris River nor are they the salt streams of
Hormozgan. None of these rivers has a significant fishery. At its
northern edge, the Zohreh River flows across the Khuzestan plains and
is close to Tigris River tributaries. Other major rivers are the
Helleh, which debouches into the Gulf north of Bushehr (28°59'N,
50°50'E) and the Mand or Qarah Aqaj (= the classical Sitakos), which, with its tributaries, drains much of
Fars Province to the Gulf south of Bushehr. Near Shiraz it is known as
the Qarah Aqaj or Kavar River. The Band-e Bahman, a weir or small dam on
this river near Kavar, is probably pre-Islamic.
The Mand River is 480 km long and occupies a basin of about 60,000
sq km. Its flow is reduced by a low snow cover (although there can be
torrential spring flow), water seepage, evaporation and abstraction
for irrigation purposes. Discharge has been estimated to range from
10-2025 cu m (Merchant and Ronaghy, 1976). It is also polluted near
Kavar (29°11'N, 52°44'E) by sewage and agriculture residues and does dry up to a series of
isolated pools there. A fish kill, numbering in the many thousands,
occurred in the Mand near Shiraz in 1977 and was attributed to
chemicals used in spraying against malarial mosquitos. The people
hired to spray village houses either dumped quantities of the chemical
into the river to reduce their work load or washed out containers in
the river (Coad, 1980c). Temperature range is at least 20C°
between winter and summer. The delta of the Mand is a Protected Area
of 46,700 ha. There are thin oxbow lakes and associated marshes.
The Mand has a number of tributaries, at least two of which are
called Shur (= salt) River. Conductivity near Firuzabad on the Shur
River is 695-715 µM/cm but rises to 20,000 µM/cm below salt domes
further downriver. The more southerly headwaters are close to those of
the Shur River of the Hormozgan basin between Darab (28°45'N,
54°34'E) and Fasa (28°56'N, 53°42'E). The headwaters of the Mand lie
north-west of Shiraz near Kuh-e Tabask at 2318 m (29°52'N,
51°49'E) and there are a series of springs in this area called Chehel Chashmeh (= Forty Springs) which
feed the Mand. Nearby is the Dasht-e Arzhan (29°39'N, 51°58'E), a small enclosed basin with a
flooded plain encompassing about 24 sq km at maximum. It is fed by
small springs and streams. The water is fresh since swallow holes in
the southeast corner of the plain drain water away with a salt
flushing effect. Shiraz was once "chiefly supplied with fish from
this lake" (Ouseley, 1819-1823) but it does not now support such
a copious ichthyofauna. A report from Reuters (8 June 2000)
cites a fish kill numbering in the hundreds of thousands from the
"Arjang lagoon, in a suburb of the southern city of Shiraz",
presumably this lake, after it dried up (www.iran-sabz.org/news/fish2.htm).
The Haft Barm-e Kudian lie about 20 km north of Dasht-e Arzhan at 29°49'N,
52°02'E at 2200 m. The seven lakes lie in
rolling country and the largest is about a 1 sq km. Some may dry up in
certain years but fish were found suggesting that there is a perennial
water supply (Cornwallis, 1968a). Scott (1995) says the southern 5
lakes generally dry out completely in summer. In winter the lakes
freeze over. They are about 2-3 m deep and some are slightly saline.
These lakes have been stocked with Esox lucius, Hypophthalmichthys
molitrix, Ctenopharyngodon idella and Gambusia holbrooki.
Surber (1969) gives some spot data on pH, total alkalinity,
calcium-magnesium hardness, chlorides and free CO2 in the
Mand basin. Near Firuzabad, the concentration of total dissolved
solids is 333 mg/l while near Jahrom it reaches 6937 mg/l, indicating
how there can be great variations in habitat within the same river
basin over short distances, depending on local geology.
The Zohreh River and its tributary the Shul, are over 400 km long
and have their headwaters near Kuh-e Barm Firuz at 3673 m (30°25'N,
51°58'E) whose northern flank spawns the
Khersan River, a Karun tributary in the Tigris basin. Its basin is
estimated to be 15,500 sq km. The Kowsar Dam at Gachsaran is 337.5 m
high, its crest is 126 m and the reservoir capacity is 450 million cu
m (http://netiran.com/news/IRNA/html/941126IRGG10.html). Gorjipoor et al.
(2007) carried out a limnological investigation of the Zohreh River.
The Helleh River receives the Dalaki (205 km) and Shapur (231 km)
rivers which drain the lower Zagros ranges west of Shiraz. Its basin
is estimated to be 20,300 sq km (Shiati (1989) gives 10,000 sq km) and
includes Lake Famur. Shiati (1989) gave an account of salinity in the
rivers of this basin. Saline springs and salt domes increase the
salinity about 10 times as the rivers flow down from the mountains.
Total dissolved solids in the upper reaches of this basin are 366
mg/l, rising to 4219 mg/l in the lower reaches. Geological sources of
sulphur also add to the chemical make up of these waters. There are no
important sources of industrial pollution along these rivers but
humans, domestic animals and agriculture are the main pollution
sources. The levels of pollution are in the acceptable range (Gh.
Izadpanahi, pers. comm., 1995). Aquaculture in the area (Helleh and Mand river
basins) has not had obvious effects on coastal water quality (Omidi, 2006). The delta of the Helleh River
is a complex of brackish and fresh marshes and lagoons with a maximum
depth of 3.5 m. It is the largest freshwater marsh system on the
Persian Gulf coast in southern Iran. It is designated as a Protected
Area (42,600 ha). This area developed in the early 1970s when the main
river channel was diverted onto the coastal plain.
A cave at Bishapur above the Shapur River is reputed to house a
deep lake full of fish but this has not been investigated and may only
be a local legend (Mounsey, 1872).
Endorheic Lake Famur, Perishan or Parishan (29°31'N,
51°48'E) is a particular feature of the
Gulf basin which encompasses 42 sq km at about 820 m near Kazerun, is
fed by about 80 fresh and brackish springs with a discharge of about
800 litres/second and supports a fish fauna near the springs. In years
of heavy rainfall the fresh areas expand only to contract in dry years.
The ringing marshes are eutrophic and have halophytic plants of the
genera Salsola, Kochia, Camphorosma and Halocnemum
along with extensive reedbeds of Phragmites communis and Typha.
This marshy shore attained 31°C in early June when air temperature was 43°C.
Maximum depth is about 6 m, falling in summer to 3.87 m. pH is 7-8.
The drainage basin encompasses about 290 sq km. Conductivity is 5 to 6,000 micromhos.
Södergren et al. (1978) recorded pollution in fish from
this lake and the Shapur and Kupor rivers. Only small amounts of the
organochlorine chemical p,p'-DDE were found in the
lake but the rivers had very high levels of DDT and its metabolites
DDE and TDE. At this time DDT was used for indoor spraying against
malaria-infected mosquitos and insecticide containers were cleaned in
the rivers after spraying.
An account of the lake is given in Farsi by Maafi (1996a; 1996b;
1996c). The lake is eutrophic and low
concentrations of oxygen periodically cause fish mortalities. The reed
beds are set on fire to increase the available agricultural land and
this results in a sediment input with the consequent decrease in water
depth, fingerling habitat destruction, and fish mortality through
sediments clogging gills. Overfishing is also a problem. Wastewater
and sewage enter the lake untreated and this enhances algal growth and
eutrophication. Fishery ponds are established west of Lake Parishan
resulting in exotic escapes. During periods of low rainfall, Parishan
becomes a shallow saline lake and presumably fish habitat is limited
to the immediate vicinity of freshwater springs.
Lake Parishan and the nearby Dasht-e Arjan (29°37'N, 51°59'E) are a Ramsar Site (World
Conservation Monitoring Centre, 1990). They lie within the Arjan
National Park and International Reserve which encompasses 65,750 ha as
established in 1973. However the Park has been downgraded to a
Protected Area of 52,800 ha with the Ramsar Site being the wetlands of
Lake Parishan at 4200 ha and Dasht-e Arjan at 2400 ha (Khan et al.,
1992). Dasht-e Arjan at 1950 m is a shallow, eutrophic freshwater lake
fed by runoff, precipitation and the Salmon springs. The lake area in
winter may be 1950 ha but shrinks in summer to a few hundred hectares. It dried
completely in 2001. There is an outflow through swallow-holes in the south-east,
traditionally linked to Lake Parishan. The lake margin and the
spring-fed marshes have Phragmites communis, Typha and Juncus
along with aquatic vegetation. Dasht-e Arjan is cooler than the
environs of Lake Parishan because of its higher altitude - 15-35°C
in summer and -10-15°C in winter as opposed to 22-40°C and 5-15°C.
As well as the rivers described above, springs and qanats are
important in the Gulf basin. The Dalaki mineral springs have a temperature range
of 30-38°C and a discharge of 200l/s. They are at 130 m above sea level and
their hydrology, geology and chemistry is reviewed in Kompani-Zare and Moore
(2001). The fishes in this area have not been investigated.
Rabbaniha et al. (2003) surveyed the larval ichthyofauna in the Farakeh Creek estuary area in
the northern Gulf and found 15 families to be represented, Clupeidae, Gobiidae
and Sillaginidae making up almost 94% of the catch.
The Shabankareh Dam is a diversion dam in the lower Helleh River basin and several other dams have been planned for this basin. Small canals or diversions are also present in this
basin (Borowicka, 1958).
Berg (1940) places this basin, the Hormozgan basin and the Makran
basin as part of the Sind Province of the Indian Subregion of the
Sino-Indian Region. Its eastwards extent is the lower and middle Indus
River. The Iranian portion is called the Southern Iranian District.
Small southern Iranian rivers belonged to a single river basin in the
Pliocene, facilitating dispersal according to Berg.
Hormozgan
The Hormozgan basin comprises a number of intermittent streams and
rivers which drain to the Straits of Hormuz. None of the rivers has a
significant fishery. The basin has a catchment of 55,800 sq km.
Rainfall is low and sporadic at this southern end of the Zagros
Mountains and streams are not always perennial. Qanats are an
important feature and there is a hot spring (41°C) at Genu (27°26'N, 56°20'E)
just north of Bandar-e Abbas. This area of Iran is rich in salt domes
rising to over 1200 m above the surrounding land surface and
consequently surface water is often contaminated and stream banks are
rimed with salt (Lehner, 1944; Shearman, 1976; Kent, 1979). Some of
the islands off this coast are salt plugs, e.g. Hormuz Island.
Temperatures in winter are high in the lower streams, 15-33°C,
and must be much higher in summer. These warm and saline streams are
home to the endemic cichlid, Iranocichla hormuzensis, and so
are distinguished from the fresh waters to the north, east and west. This
species has been collected in the Minab River where my collections in the 1970s
did not find it. The Minab River was therefore included in the Makran basin but
may well form the easternmost part of this basin. However the possibility of an
introduction of this species to the Minab cannot be ruled out.
The principal river is the Kul with its tributary the Shur (= salt)
River. The upper reaches of the Shur lie west of Darab (28°45'N,
54°34'E) and mountains here exceed 3000 m. The headwaters of the Shur approach those of the eastern
tributaries of the Mand River basin. The lower valleys parallel the
coast and drain eastwards. The Rasul River is a tributary of the Kul,
while the Mehran River drains directly into the sea. The Mehran delta
lies in the Hara Protected Area (Biosphere Reserve) described by
Zehzad et al. (1998). The offshore islands such as Qeshm, are
poor in fresh water, but have not been explored. A number of streams
cross the plain east of Bandar-e Abbas (27°11'N, 56°17'E) draining the Kuh-e Furgun at
3279 m and associated ranges. Although many streams are salty, a
freshwater oasis is found at Sar Khun (27°23'N, 56°26'E).
Several islands in the Persian Gulf are included as part of this
basin. The largest island is Qeshm but it lacks rivers although there are some
small dams to collect rainwater runoff (A. R. Zeanaie, pers. comm., 1999).
Species observed are Aphanius dispar, a mudskipper and the introduced Gambusia
holbrooki. Water temperatures reach 32°C.
Makran
The Makran is the coastal region of southeastern Iran between the
Straits of Hormuz and the Pakistan border. In the west of this region
the relief runs in a north-south direction parallel to the coast but
from Jask eastwards the relief runs west-east, again paralleling the
coast, to the Pakistan border. The rivers and streams of the Makran
all drain to the sea at the Straits of Hormuz and the Sea of Oman. The
inland Hamun-e Jaz Murian basin is isolated by mountain ranges
reaching peaks in excess of 2000 m. The coastal drainages are often
incised and the larger watercourses pass through tangs over 1000 m
deep (Harrison, 1968).
I have not seen the watercourses between Jask and the upper Geh (=
Nikshahr, Kaeyr or Kalar) River drainage (mouth is at 25°37'N,
60°08'E) but descriptions by Harrison
(1941) indicate they are similar to other areas of Makran. It seems
probable that only the Minab and Sarbaz Rivers have, or nearly have, a
perennial and continuous flow along most of their course. Even these
rivers are quite shallow and the Sarbaz in particular is easily
fordable on foot along its entire length (ca. 280 km). The Minab River
flows over a shorter course (ca. 220 km) than the Sarbaz, but has a
greater flow regime. At Minab (27°09'N, 57°05'E) and at Rudan (27°26'N,
57°12'E) the Minab River was up to 100 m
wide with an estimated maximum depth in pools of 2-3 m. The lower
Sarbaz River was a series of shallow, muddy pools in the bottom of a
canyon with some water flowing over sills connecting the pools (in
early December 1977). The lower Sarbaz has been designated a Wetland of
International Importance. In its middle and upper course the Sarbaz varied
from a very shallow and narrow stream connecting pools (some of which
were fishless) to what must be termed a river in the semi-desert
environment of Baluchestan, with a width of 10 m, a depth of about 1 m
and fast current. The rockfill embankment Pishin Dam built over the
rivers Pishin and Sarbaz is 63 m high, has a crest length of 400 m and
can store 175 million cu m of flood waters (http://netiran.com/news/IRNA/html/930418IRGG10.html).
The other streams of the Makran have little running water, often
become isolated pools a kilometre or more apart, and regularly dry up
along much of their length. Several rivers between the Mazavi (= Geru)
River (mouth is at 26°56'N, 56°56'E)
and the port of Jask are named and marked prominently on maps, but
these were all dry in their lower reaches in late November 1976. Some
flow in their upper reaches is to be expected, but its extent will
depend on topography and recent climatic conditions. A dam and irrigation network is to be constructed on the Jaghin River east of
Jask (IRNA, 26 June 2000).
Coad (1997a) combined the basins of the Makran, Lut, Jaz Murian,
Mashkel and the Pakistani Pishin Lora as a single entity, expanding on
earlier work by Mirza (1980). Mirza proposed the name Gedrosia for the
Baluchistan Plateau west of the Central Brahui and Hala Ranges in
Pakistan. The easternmost river along the Makran coast is the Hingol
in Pakistan. East of this river the fauna becomes much more diverse at
all taxonomic levels and the fauna is an Indus River one. In the
north, the Pishin Lora River basin lies partly in Pakistan and partly
in Afghanistan. Beyond this basin to the north and northwest lies the
Registan Desert and then the Sistan basin, with its distinctive faunal
mix including schizothoracines (Schizothorax, Schizocypris
and Schizopygopsis) and a crested loach (Nemacheilus
rhadineus). To the northeast lies an area designated as Yaghistan
by Mirza (1980), with its unique faunal association. The westernmost
river is the Dasht, whose upper reaches cross the Iranian border. The
western limit of Gedrosia is the Mashkel River basin which has several
tributaries from Iran. Coad (1997a) proposed that the limits of
Gedrosia be extended westwards to encompass the Iranian part of the
Mashkel basin, along coastal Makran as far west as the Minab River,
and internally to include the Jaz Murian and southern Lut basins. West
of the Minab River, the fauna was deemed to be unique in having an
endemic cichlid, Iranocichla hormuzensis and in having members
of such Euro-Mediterranean and Southwest Asian (= Middle East)
cyprinid genera as Barbus, Chalcalburnus (= Alburnus), Leuciscus
(= Squalius) and the cobitid genus Cobitis not found further east. However
specimens of Iranocichla hormuzensis have been collected from
the Minab River by H. R. Esmaeili (examined by me in 1997) and this
river may properly belong to the Hormozgan basin. I did not collect this
species in the 1970s and it is possible that the record is an
introduction since that time from adjacent rivers as there have been
many accidental movements of fishes in Iran associated with fish farming.
Generally basins within Gedrosia appear most closely related to
their geographical neighbours and support the argument for containing
these endorheic basins in one division. No basins are strongly and
uniquely linked although Makran and Jaz Murian uniquely share Garra
persica and Channa gachua, and Mashkel and Makran uniquely
share Aspidoparia morar and Nemacheilus baluchiorum.
At the species level Gedrosia is most closely related to the
adjacent Yaghistan and Indus basins to the east, then to the adjacent
Sistan and Hormozgan basins, and least of all to the remoter
Tigris-Euphrates basin. Its principal relationships are eastern, to
some extent northern and very little to the west.
The generic pattern is different from the species one. The Sistan
basin has the highest share of genera, followed by Yaghistan and Hormozgan. The Indus and Tigris-Euphrates
share far fewer genera but they have a greater diversity (5.8 and 2.3 times that of Gedrosia). It is
therefore not surprising that Gedrosia shares proportionately more
genera with immediately neighbouring basins whose fauna at the generic
level is also limited. However, omitting genera found in all basins or
unique to a single basin, reveals that Yaghistan and Indus share 5 of
7 such genera exclusively with Gedrosia. Only Capoeta shows a
different pattern being found in the western basins but not Yaghistan
and Indus. The last genus is Crossocheilus which is found in
the Indus, Yaghistan and Sistan basins. Therefore, generic level
comparisons also show that Gedrosia is most closely related to the east.
The transitional nature of Gedrosia is evidenced by its having the
distributional limits of certain wide-ranging species. This is most
notable for species reaching their westernmost limits, namely Aspidoparia
morar, Crossocheilus latius, Channa gachua, Labeo
dero, Puntius sophore, and Tor putitora (the last
three not recorded from Iran). Species are probably limited by
environmental conditions such as temperature in comparison with the
warm waters of South Asia. However a significant factor, as recognised
by local people, must be the poor physical condition of Baluchistan.
Freshwater marshes, lakes and large rivers are all absent. Desiccation
of water bodies is common and many streams are intermittent. Habitat
diversity for fishes is severely limited. All the common fish species
are non-predatory - most fishes feed on small insects or scrape
aufwuchs from the rocky stream beds.
In contrast to western limits, only one species has a distribution
which is principally Southwest Asian and reaches its eastern limit in
Gedrosia, namely Capoeta damascina. The remaining species have
distributions which are centred on Gedrosia and immediately adjacent
basins. There is also a link northwards in that some species have an
extensive north-south distribution, namely Garra rossica, Nemacheilus
kessleri and N. sargadensis.
One of the most interesting features of Gedrosia is its paucity of
fishes. Diversity is low, presumably a result of the physical
conditions noted above, compounded by desiccation and during climatic
variations both past and present. Gedrosia is presumably an important
former route of dispersal for taxa from South and Southeast Asia to
Southwest Asia and beyond. The significant absences are of taxa found
in the Tigris-Euphrates basin to the west and in the Indus basin to the east.
At the family level, five families are found both west and east,
but not in, Gedrosia. These are Cobitidae, Bagridae, Siluridae,
Sisoridae and Mastacembelidae. No cobitid or silurid genera are
shared. They may be quite ancient and their absence from Gedrosia is
by a vicariant event or their dispersal was via a northern route to
the Tigris-Euphrates and separately to the Indus. The most significant
absences are of such genera as Mystus in the Bagridae, Glyptothorax
in the Sisoridae, Mastacembelus in the Mastacembelidae (Mastacembelus
is not found in eastern Iran and hence does not have a continuous
range throughout the Orient (pace Travers (1984)), and also Barilius
in the Cyprinidae. The last three genera are found in drainages
entering the upper Persian Gulf separate from the Tigris-Euphrates
basin but probably had a recent connection with that basin during the
Pleistocene lowering of sea levels when the Gulf was drained.
Berg (1940) suggested that fish dispersal across this region was
facilitated by the coastal rivers of Iranian and Pakistani Baluchestan
being part of a single river system in the Pliocene, since submerged
by subsidence. This distribution of these genera is not, therefore, a
remnant of the dispersal across Iran from Asia. It is possible that
the Pleistocene fore-deep of the Himalayas had connections with the
Tigris-Euphrates basin which extending down the Persian Gulf as a
river valley. Hora (1937) and Menon (1957) refer to wet, marshy,
tropical conditions and headwater captures along the whole southern
face of the Himalayas and westwards during the Pliocene and early
Pleistocene facilitating the spread of fishes from the east to what is
now Southwest Asia (= Middle East) and Africa. However, it is here
considered unlikely that the Tigris-Euphrates and Gedrosian rivers
were once tributary to the Indus when sea levels were lower during
glaciations as the Gulf of Oman descends to an abyssal plain at 3340 m
as noted above. These taxa probably reached the Tigris-Euphrates basin
across the Iranian land mass and subsequently became extinct as
desiccation increased. Their absence from Gedrosia is probably by loss.
Hora (1937) and Briggs (1987) consider that cyprinids entered
Africa from southeast Asia 18-16 MYA, in the early Miocene, while
other groups moved through Iran and the Arabian Peninsula beginning in
the early Eocene. Kosswig (1951; 1952; 1955a; 1955b) notes the
similarity at the generic level between Indian and African fishes,
e.g. the cyprinids Barilius, Garra and Labeo,
indicating that these fishes arrived in Africa from India after the
desiccation of the Syrian-Iranian Sea in the Pliocene. The primary
route, according to Kosswig and to Por (1987), was a northern one
around the barrier of the Persian Gulf and Sea of Oman via northern
Arabia, Syria and the Levant. Cooling conditions in these areas, and
presumably too in Gedrosia, during the Pliocene and especially the
Pleistocene glaciations, and arid climates at times, were unsuitable
for tropical forms.
Potential endemic taxa are Cyprinion milesi, N.
bampurensis (in Iran), Labeo gedrosicus, Labeo macmahoni,
Nemacheilus baluchiorum, and N. brahui (in Pakistan).
The systematic position, as species, of Cyprinion milesi and Labeo
gedrosicus need further study, and the distributions of the three Nemacheilus
species are in contention. Endemism may be relatively high or low
dependent on the resolution of these problems.
Fishes in the easternmost part of the basin have a unique predator
to contend with among Iranian species. The gandoo (marsh crocodile or
mugger, Crocodylus palustris) is found in the Sarbaz, Khaju and
Bahu Kalat rivers including the Pishin Dam, makeshift lagoons and fish
culture ponds. It is feeds on Cyprinus carpio and Periophthalmus
(Crocodile Specialist Group Newsletter, IUCN, 18(1), WWW Edition,
downloaded 16 December 1999 from www.flmnh.ufl.edu/natsci/herpetology/newsletter/news181b.htm;
report by A. Mobaraki; A. Mobaraki, pers. comm., 2000). The Cyprinus carpio
are escapees from fish farms.
Tigris River
The Tigris-Euphrates basin is the largest and most important river
system between the Nile and the Indus. Details of its biology can be
found in Rzóska (1980) but comparatively little is based on the
Iranian part of this basin although Nümann (1966) gives some limited
data on chemical and physical parameters. Studies on limnology and
pollution were restricted mostly to waters of Iraq, but probably apply
equally well to Iran, certainly as far as those marshes which cross
the border are concerned and for the Shatt al Arab, part of which
forms the southern border of Iran and Iraq. Such studies include
Cressey (1958a), Jacobsen and Adams (1958), Al-Hamed (1966c), Mohammed
(1965; 1966), Salonen (1970), Al-Saadi and Arndt (1973), Al-Sahaf (1975), Al-Saadi et
al. (1975), Arndt and Al-Saadi (1975), Antoine and Al-Saadi
(1982), Maulood et al. (1979; 1981; 1993), Sarker et al.
(1980), Saad (1978a; 1978b), Saad and Antoine (1978a; 1978b; 1978c;
1982; 1983), Saad and Kell (1975), Kell and Saad (1975), Al-Hamed
(1976), Al-Daham et al. (1981), Huq et al. (1981),
Schiewer et al. (1982), Antoine (1983), DouAbul et al.
(1987; 1987; 1988), Abaychi and Al-Saad (1988), Abaychi et al.
(1988), Mohamed and Barak (1988), Al-Saadi et al. (1989),
Hussain et al. (1991), Kassim and Al-Saadi (1995), Partow (2001), among
others. Ionides (1937) describes the river regimes of the
Tigris-Euphrates basin, MacFadyen (1938) the water supplies, El Kholy
(1952) the hydrology of the Tigris River, Buringh (1957) the
physiographic regions, shores and irrigation systems on the lower
Mesopotamian plain, and Al-Khashab (1958) the water budget of the
Tigris-Euphrates basin, mainly referring to waters in Iraq. Scott
(1995) gives details of wetlands in Iraq, some of which border and/or
are contiguous with Iranian wetlands, and whose general ecological
features are very similar. Shapland (1997) reviews water disputes in
the Middle East although western Iranian rivers flow out of the
country and are not likely to be affected apart from any losses in
shared habitats or refuges in border areas.
Por and Dimentman (1989) regard the Tigris-Euphrates or
Mesopotamian basin as a cradle for inland aquatic faunas. A
proto-Euphrates collected water from the Levant and had contacts with
the Black and Caspian sea drainages before the Pliocene orogeny. Berg
(1940) points out that the upper reaches of the Tigris-Euphrates basin
today lie on a plateau close to the upper reaches of the Caspian Sea
basin. The basin acted as an area where African and Asian species
could meet or transit such as the cichlid Iranocichla. These
connections were interrupted in the early Pliocene by orogeny, rifting
and desert formation. Banarescu (1977) and Por and Dimentman (1989)
regard the area to be a zoogeographic crossroads with elements from
the Palaearctic such as the cyprinid genera Leuciscus (= Squalius) and Chondrostoma,
Mediterranean genera such as the cyprinid Acanthobrama
(although Krupp (1987) refers to this genus as Palaearctic, of
Mesopotamian origin), and Oriental genera such as the cyprinid Garra
and the spiny eel Mastacembelus.
Khalaji-Pirbalouty and Sari (2004) studied the biogeography of amphipods
crustaceans in the central Zagros Mountains. They consider habitat
diversification and climatic fluctuations to be the principal factors
influencing species diversity and endemism in this area, with the mountains
acting as a barrier to species distribution. Endemism is evident in lizards,
plants and amphipods as well as fish.
An analysis by Coad (1996f) shows that this basin is mainly
Black-Caspian sea basin in its connections, with minor links to Asia
and possibly Africa. Numbers of families, genera and species shared
between the Tigris-Euphrates and neighbouring basins are summarised in
this analysis. Relatively few taxa appear to have made the transition
between Asia and Africa or survived subsequent climatic and habitat changes.
Certain families are absent from the Tigris-Euphrates but are found
in the Indus and the Nile (Notopteridae, Schilbeidae, Clariidae,
Anabantidae, Channidae). These are assumed to be of Gondwanic origin
and are separated today by plate tectonic movements. A representative
of the Channidae is found in eastern Iran but this species is at the
western limit of its range there. Only two families are shared between
the three basins but are not found to the north, Bagridae and
Mastacembelidae, and the relationships of the two species in these
families are with the Indus (Travers, 1984).
At the generic level, some have dispersed into eastern Iran from
the Indus and other eastern basins but have not reached the
Tigris-Euphrates basin, presumably for reasons of time or lack of
suitable environmental conditions, e.g. Aspidoparia, Crossocheilus,
schizothoracines. However two genera have reached the Tigris-Euphrates
(Glyptothorax, Barilius) and Howes (1982) considers Cyprinion
to be related to the eastern genus Semiplotus. Barilius
resembles Indus and other eastern species superficially although its
relationships have not been fully worked out. Assuming that these taxa
dispersed westward from the Indus and the east, the route must be
determined. All but Cyprinion are absent from much of Iran,
including the bagrid Mystus and the mastacembelid Mastacembelus
referred to at the family level above (Mastacembelus is not
found in eastern Iran and hence does not have a continuous range
throughout the Orient (pace Travers (1984)). It is unlikely
that rivers of the Tigris-Euphrates basin were once tributary to the
Indus when sea levels were lower during glaciations as the Gulf of
Oman descends to an abyssal plain at 3340 m. I suspect, but cannot
prove, that these taxa reached the Tigris-Euphrates basin across the
Iranian land mass and subsequently became extinct as desiccation
increased. Many of the rivers in southern and eastern Iran today are
very small, regularly dry up and some are highly saline. They may be
unsuitable for these taxa. Barilius, it should be noted,
appears to prefer, in Asia and the Tigris-Euphrates basin, large
lowland rivers and its dispersal across Iran is difficult to envisage
by headwater capture (the other genera can be found in small streams
at higher altitudes as well as lowland rivers). However Berg (1940)
suggested that fish dispersal across this region was facilitated by
the coastal rivers of Iranian and Pakistani Baluchestan being part of
a single river system in the Pliocene, since submerged by subsidence.
The presence of Mastacembelus and Barilius in western
Iranian basins is attributed to headwater capture and/or colonisation
from the Tigris-Euphrates basin when Gulf rivers were tributary to an
expanded Tigris-Euphrates basin during lowered sea levels in glacial
times. This distribution of these genera is not, therefore, a remnant
of the dispersal across Iran from Asia.
At the generic level, only Garra is found from the Indus to
the Nile and in the Tigris-Euphrates basin. Menon (1964) suggests that
Garra reached the Tigris-Euphrates basin and Africa in two
"waves" from Asia, the first wave being in the Miocene to
the Tigris-Euphrates basin, the second through southern Arabia to
Africa during the Pliocene. Karaman (1971) disputes Menon's Garra
waves based on anatomy and zoogeography. Garra presumably
dispersed from Asia to Africa via the Tigris-Euphrates basin and the
Levant. The apparent continuous distribution of Garra across
southern Arabia is not borne out in systematic analyses by Krupp
(1983). Garra (and Cyprinion) species of southeastern
Arabia are clearly related to southern Iranian species, having crossed
the Persian Gulf when it was drained during the Pleistocene and part
of an extended Tigris-Euphrates basin. Southwestern Arabian species
(and a Barbus species) are a mixture of African and Levantine
elements. Krupp (1983) found no evidence in his studies for the
Arabian Peninsula serving as a transition area in an exchange of
freshwater fishes between Asia and Africa.
Nemacheilus also has a similar wide distribution but is
probably polyphyletic and requires a detailed revision to enable
adequate zoogeographical analyses to be made. The systematics of
loaches in the Middle East is a contentious subject (Por and Dimentman,
1989). The absence of Nemacheilus species from southern Arabia
also argues for a dispersal route through the Tigris-Euphrates basin
as these cryptic fishes are found today in many small streams
throughout Southwest Asia and are unlikely to have been eliminated
from southern Arabia through desiccation.
The only Nile (or east African) genus present in the
Tigris-Euphrates basin is Barbus. Certain members of this
polyphyletic genus in Southwest Asia are characterised by sharing 6
branched anal fin rays, last unbranched dorsal fin ray a smooth spine,
large scales, few gill rakers, high dorsal fin ray counts, reduced
barbel numbers, compressed body, and other characters which set them
apart from European Barbus as a monophyletic group, probably
related to east African species (suggested by Banister (1980)). These Barbus
species are found from southwestern Arabia (but not southeastern
Arabia), through the Levant and the Tigris-Euphrates basin to rivers
at the Strait of Hormuz in Iran. They may represent an African element
in the fauna of the Tigris-Euphrates and may reflect the route of the
cichlid Iranocichla or its ancestor from Africa to the Strait
of Hormuz. Bănărescu (1992b) considers African elements in Southwest Asia to be the oldest,
of at least Miocene age.
A significant proportion of the families and genera in the
Tigris-Euphrates basin is also found in the Black-Caspian sea basin.
Such widespread, northern cyprinid genera as Alburnoides, Alburnus,
Aspius, Alburnus, Chondrostoma, and Leuciscus
(= Squalius) reach their southern limit in the Tigris-Euphrates basin (and
neighbouring Iranian basins) suggesting that they reached the
Tigris-Euphrates basin from the north.
The presence of Glyptothorax in the Black Sea basin of
Anatolia (Coad and Delmastro, 1985) is a recent event through
headwater capture from the Tigris-Euphrates basin and thus far is the
only example of a clearly-defined Indus genus reaching the
Black-Caspian seas basin. It is probably an example, in reverse, of
the colonisation of the Tigris-Euphrates basin in recent times from
the Black-Caspian seas basin. Headwaters of a number of
Tigris-Euphrates basin rivers interdigitate with the upper reaches of
Black-Caspian seas basin rivers, e.g. the Aras River of the Caspian
Sea and the Kizilirmak of the Black Sea with the Euphrates near
Erzurum and Sivas respectively; the Qezel Owzan of the Caspian Sea
with Tigris River tributaries. Headwater capture is common in the
Zagros Mountains (Oberlander, 1965) and in Anatolia and pluvial
conditions in the past would have facilitated fish dispersal. Por and
Dimentman (1989) mention direct connections of a proto-Euphrates with
Black Sea and Caspian sea fluviatile drainages before the Pliocene
orogeny which would serve to allow entry of taxa to the
Tigris-Euphrates basin. Direct connections were interrupted by the
early Pliocene as orogeny, rifting and desertification took hold.
Almaça (1990) has reviewed possible routes for Barbus species
into Iran and the Tigris-Euphrates basin from the north via what is
now Anatolia and east of the Caspian Sea dating from the early
Oligocene. A continuous route for exchange of taxa has been possible
since the upper Miocene, almost 12 million years ago. These routes
have been variously available down to modern times for Barbus
and other taxa as exemplified by some species being in common between
the Black-Caspian seas basin while others are distinct but related at
the generic level. Bănărescu (1992b) considers that northern or European elements penetrated to the
Tigris-Euphrates basin earlier than Asian ones, and that this partially explains their prevalence.
Iranian internal and Gulf basins and the Levant show evident
affinities with the Tigris-Euphrates basin. The ichthyogeography of
the Levant has been dealt with by Krupp (1987) and will not be
reviewed here. Krupp considers that parts of the Levant were colonised
separately via branches of the Tigris-Euphrates river system. Iranian
basins to the west of the Tigris-Euphrates basin have a very similar
fauna to that of the Tigris-Euphrates at the species level. The
diversity falls off rapidly with distance (Coad, 1987). Headwater
capture in the Zagros Mountains is an evident route for species found
in common with the Tigris-Euphrates basin but not in Iranian rivers
draining separately to the Gulf. The draining of the Gulf during
Pleistocene lowering of sea levels enabled Tigris-Euphrates basin
fishes to colonise tributary Iranian rivers now separated by a rise in
sea level. The melting of the Laurentide ice sheet and drainage of Lake Agassiz
in Canada caused this rise in sea level world-wide, including the shallow
Persian Gulf (Perkins, 2002). By about 11,500 years B.P., the Gulf was filled
with present shorelines attained shortly before 6000 B.P. and exceeded by 1-2 m (Lambeck, 1996).
Por and Dimentman (1989) regard the Mesopotamian subregion or
Tigris-Euphrates basin as one of the most isolated major freshwater
areas in the world. However, as Coad (1997f) points out, endemism is
only at the species level and diversity is low with only about 52
primary division species in 7 families, 34 species of which are Cyprinidae.
The Zagros Mountains form the western flank of Iran and store water
as snow. The higher peaks are snow-capped even in summer. Zard Kuh,
for example, reaches 4548 m (32°22'N, 50°04'E).
Rivers drain south and west to become tributaries of the Tigris River
in Iraq or its confluence with the Euphrates River, the Shatt al Arab
(known as the Arvand (= swift) Rud in Iran). The Shatt al Arab has a course of
190 km to the head of the Persian Gulf and is navigable by ocean-going
ships. It forms part of the Iran-Iraq border. The origin of the Tigris
River is the Hazar Gölü of Elazig (38°41'N, 39°14'E) between the Murat Nehri and the
Euphrates. It flows south-east, forming a short section of the border
of Syria with Turkey, before entering Iraq to parallel, roughly, the
course of the Euphrates River. It is a larger and swifter river than
the Euphrates because of its left bank tributaries from Iran. The
Tigris is over 1900 km long (1851 km and 2032 km are extremes cited in
the literature). It is the 81st river in size in the world. The
Tigris-Euphrates basin encompasses 784,500 sq km of which 19% or
146,000 sq km lies in Iran (Gleick (1993) gives 238,500 sq km and 27%
for Iran and 884,000 sq km for the whole basin; the Iraqi Government
in the same publication gives 378,834 sq km for the Tigris basin alone
with Iran's share 28.8%). Iran contributes 7% of the water supply of
this immense basin. The Tigris catchment is 166,155 sq km.
The Tigris is an alkaline river (pH 7.8-8.2) with a total hardness of 200-350 mg/l.
Water temperatures range from 8.5°C in January to 31.4°C in August. The flow
pattern of the Tigris and its tributaries has a sharp peak in April at
about 9 billion cu m, falling rapidly to about 1 billion cu m from
August to October before beginning to rise again. The water level may
fall by as much as 2 m over the summer. Interannual variation in
spring flood levels are marked. Approximate streamflows over the past
6000 years are given by Kay and Johnson (1981) based on proxy data
from paleoenvironmental sources. They found an increase in streamflow
over this period. The southern province of Khuzestan in the Tigris
river basin with 9% of Iran's surface area has an estimated 37% of its
surface water flow.
The Shatt al Arab is under tidal influence up to 110 km from the
mouth. Its waters are therefore strongly mineralised. Salinity varies
with distance from the sea. Crops are irrigated by means of the tidal
rise which is used to push fresh water into the fields (Harrison,
1942; Gholizadeh, 1963; Gholizadeh and Fatemi, 1969). This has obvious effects for the
fish fauna and its composition as well as for increased salinisation
of habitats. There are appreciable diurnal and seasonal fluctuations
in physico-chemical conditions. Tidal waters probably penetrated far
inland through the Holocene as evidenced by faunal remains in
boreholes of the Hammar Formation (MacFadyen and Vita-Finzi, 1978).
Al-Hassan and Hussain (1985) describe the hydrological parameters
affecting the penetration of marine fishes into the Shatt al Arab.
Recently an increase in the Tigris River discharge has decreased
salinity in the Shatt al Arab: previously marine species were common
at Basrah in Iraq but they became rare, Carassius auratus
appeared in Basrah fish market and Cyprinus carpio was caught
in large numbers down to the estuary (N. A. Hussain, in litt.,
1994). Pollution is widespread in the Shatt al Arab from industrial,
agricultural and untreated human wastes. Hussain et al. (2001) evaluate
environmental degradation in the Iraqi portion of the Shatt Al-Arab and its
effects on the fish fauna.
The principal Iranian tributaries of the Tigris River are the
Little Zab River (= Zab-e Kuchek) which drains a small stretch of
mountains south of Lake Orumiyeh, and the Diyala River (= Sirvan
River) which drains the western mountains of Kordestan. The Diyala
River is 442 km long. A principal tributary of the Diyala in Iran is the Qeshlaq River
which flows through Sanandaj (35°19'N, 47°00'E). Lake Zaribar, Zarivar or Zeribar is a permanent freshwater body with
fringing reed beds and extensive marshes lying at 1435 m in the Diyala
River drainage just west of Marivan at 35°32'N,
46°08'E. It has an area of 8 sq km and a
maximum depth of 6 m and an average depth of 2.5-3.5 m. Reputedly the
lake is fed by 600-700 springs. At high water it overflows into a
small river at its southern end. In winter it often freezes over. It
was damaged in the Iran-Iraq War suffering rocket and missile hits and
chemical warfare (Scott, 1995; 1997). There is a small resort at the
southeast corner of the lake, the surrounding land has livestock
grazing and agriculture with drainage channels for the peripheral
marshes, forests are cut for fuel, and there is waterfowl hunting and
fishing. Exotic fish species have been introduced by a government
organization, including Alburnus alburnus, Ctenopharyngodon
idella, Cyprinus carpio (in two varieties), Hypophthalmichthys
molitrix, H. nobilis, Pseudorasbora parva and Gambusia
holbrooki. Native fish include Capoeta buhsei (sic),Leuciscus
(= Squalius) cephalus and Mastacembelus mastacembelus
(Scott, 1997). Jalali et al. (2002) add the species Capoeta damascina
(probably the correct identification of the C. buhsei listed above),
Carassius auratus and Chalcalburnus (= Alburnus) sp.
A number of minor streams also cross the Iran-Iraq border, but the principal
rivers drain through anticlines in spectacular gorges or tangs, funnelling the waters of the Zagros onto the Khuzestan plains through
a narrow gap near Dezful (32°23'N, 48°24'E).
Stream flows in late winter are at least ten times that of summer and
116,500 sq km of mountains and three big rivers debouch onto 38,800 sq
km of plain. Lowlands may be inundated for more than 100 days. Early
accounts of floods in Mesopotamia, dating back to Sumerian times
almost 5000 years ago, are discussed by Mallowan (1964). Floods can
encompass close to 100,000 sq km in Iran and Iraq at the head of the
Persian Gulf (Naff and Matson, 1984). Progressive clearing of woodland
over the last 7000 years increased runoff, causing higher and more
severe floods, soil erosion, increased turbidity in streams and higher
sedimentation (Wagstaff, 1985). Erosion is three times the world
standard rate at 30 tonnes/hectare and will rise twofold over the next
ten years (IRNA, 20 December 1998). All these must have, and
continue, to affect the fishes in this and other basins, favouring
those species able to cope with these conditions. Even artificial habitats such
as small dam reservoirs in Chahar Mahall and Bakhtiari are affected by high
sedimentation rates and their utility as fish habitat must be affected (Mousavi
and Samadi-Boroujeni, 1998).
The main river is the Karun, with a catchment of 67,340 sq km (Naff
and Matson, 1984) and a length of 820 km. It now drains to the Shatt
al Arab but once drained directly into the Persian Gulf. The Karun is
also connected to the Gulf via the Bahmanshir River, paralleling the
Shatt al Arab, and enclosing Abadan Island. The Bahmanshir is the only
river along the Persian Gulf coast to have a significant fishery. The
Karun headwaters are extensive and lie near both the Esfahan and Kor
River basins. The environmental conditions in a headwater dam, the Hanna
Reservoir, in the Karun basin are described by Esteky (2001), two-thirds of the
reservoir being covered by macrophytes. The Dez River is a Karun tributary and is 400 km long.
The Karkheh River (with the Cherdavel, Kashkan, Qareh Su, Gav Masiab and Simareh in its upper reaches)
is 320 km long, but is lost in the Hawr-al-Azim marshes of the Tigris after
draining 43,000 sq km. Sutcliffe and Carpenter (1967) described runoff from the
Karkheh basin. The Karkheh and Dez flows were depleted by 70% in 2001
during a drought and it was thought that these rivers might dry completely
(Foltz, 2002). The marshes along the Karkheh and Dez rivers,
with oxbow lakes and riverine forest, are a habitat now rare in
southern Iran and Iraq outside protected areas. The severe drought of
the year 2000 dried up the natural Dez reservoirs south of Dezful (www.irna.com/newshtm/eng/08130315.htm,
IRNA, 29 July 2000). The Karkheh Dam, 20 km northwest of
Andimeshk, has a crest 3030 m long, a height of 127 m and is
the sixth largest dam in the world with a capacity of 7.8 billion cu m,
nearly a third of the total dam capacity for the country. The dam is meant to
produce electricity, for fish farming and to control floods and drought (IRNA,
17 April 2001; 19 April 2001; Aftab Yazd, Tehran, 346(18 April 2001, 7
pp.; Sadegi, 2003). The Qareh Su near Kermanshah is about 30 m wide and less than a metre deep at its
deepest. The Qareh Su or "black water" derives its name from
its transparency over a dark, pebbly bed, distinguishing it from the
muddy rivers of the lowlands. The Qareh Su is the Classical Choaspes,
the water of which the ancient monarchs of Persia carried with them on
their military expeditions for its taste, a superiority confirmed by
Buckingham (1829). The Gawshan Dam is located at Kamyaran near
Kermanshah on the "Gaweh" River and is scheduled for
completion in 2002. The dam will be 136 m high and the complex
includes a 19 km long tunnel for water transfer (http://netiran.com/news/IranNews/html/94111305INEC.html).
Other dams include the 40 million cu m Zarivar Dam in Marivan and the
563 million cu m Kavoshan Dam 35 km south of Sanandaj (http://netiran.com/news/TehranTimes/html/95111803TTPL.html).
Partow (2001) lists 18 dams in the Tigris basin of Iran, either constructed
or planned, and these will affect the environment markedly in changing flow
regimes, impounding water and eliminating fluvial habitat, removing silt,
affecting temperature downstream, causing salinisation as return water from
irrigation projects flows back into rivers, and so on. The Karkheh Dam is planned to carry water via pipeline over land (330 km in
length) and under the sea (210 km) to Kuwait. The supply rate would be 200
million gallons per day (Partow, 2001) or 300 million cu m (www.irna.com, downloaded 29 January 2003).
The Dez (formerly Mohammed Reza Shah Pahlavi) Dam on the Dez River at 32°38'N, 48°28'E
contains 3350 million cu m of water (another source states 60 billion
cu m) and has a maximum surface area of 4000 ha. Surface water
temperatures can exceed 30°C while at 50 m plus depths it is 15-16°C in summer.
Its original life span was estimated at 100 years but this had to be
reduced to less than 50 years because of the rapid accumulation of
sediment from erosion. Sediment prevents development of a bottom fauna
and steep banks with water fluctuations limit vegetation. Nümann
(1966, 1969) gives some limnological information on this reservoir.
Nümann (1966) recommended introduction of Acanthobrama
terraesanctae and Tilapia galilaea from Israel to the
reservoir, and later Sander lucioperca and even trout. Sabzalizadeh
(2006) gives a description of the ecology of this reservoir and Eskandary et
al. (2007) a description of fish populations. Capoeta trutta,
Barbus grypus and Barbus esocinus were the most numerous species and
the fauna includes the exotics, Carassius auratus, Hypophthalmichthys
molitrix and Oncorhynchus mykiss. There is
also a diversion dam, the Sadd-e Gotvand. The Gotvand Dam is under
construction and will be 180 m high with a reservoir capacity of 4,500
million cubic metres making it the second largest dam in Iran (sic)
(IRNA, 25 January 2000). The 205 m high Karun-3 Dam near Izeh,
to be completed in the year 2001 (filling actually started in 2003 -
www.netiran.com, downloaded 15 November 2004), is a major hydroelectrical plant as
is the Karun-4 Dam (Shahid Abbaspour) near 25 km northeast of Masjed-e
Soleyman (http://netiran.com/news/IranNews/html/95040822INPL.html). A
major dam is also planned at Shushtar (IRNA, 26 September
1998). A tunnel is planned from the Dez River to Golpayegan to supply water to
Markazi Province in central Iran (www.iranmania.com, downloaded 19 January 2004).
Some literature refers to the Seymarreh-Karasu-Gamasiab (and
variant spellings) as an important complex of rivers. These are the
Simareh, Qareh Su and Gav Masiab in gazetteers. A giant dam is planned
for the Simareh (IRNA, 26 September 1998). Nümann (1966) notes
pollution in these rivers from an oil refinery and sugar factory which
decreased fish populations, a condition exacerbated through the use of
explosives, insecticides and herbicides by local people to catch fish.
He also lists explosive usage on the rivers Khairabad and Zohreh.
Lake Mirabad lies in the basin of the Karkheh at 33°05'N,
47°43'E. While it measures only 100 by 200 m it is important for establishing past vegetation and
environments based on sediment cores (Griffiths et al., 2001). The Hashelan
or Hashilan Marsh at 34°33'N, 46°55'E occupies 260 to 400 ha (accounts differ) northwest of
Kermanshah at about 1310 m. It is a complex of permanent spring-fed
pools and associated marshes with much submerged, floating and
emergent vegetation. The surrounding plains are heavily grazed and
cultivated and ducks are hunted in the marshes. The Sabz Ali spring feeding the
marsh has an average annual discharge of 323.4 l/sec, range 208.3-442.5 l/sec,
highest in March and lowest in September. The total average volume of water in
the marsh is estimated at 1.02 x 107 (Karami et al., 2001).
Local people and those from Kermanshah fish in the marsh.
A truck carrying diethyl hexanoyl plunged into the Kashkan River, a
Karkheh tributary in Lorestan, 15 km from Pol-e Dokhtar resulting in
the poisoning of thousands of fish on 13 April 1998 (IRNA, 14
April 1998; Brief on Iran, 880, 16 April 1998). The river suffered an oil
slick in October 2001 when the Khuzestan-Tehran pipeline fractured 4 km from Pol-e
Dokhtar. Oil pollution caused a fish kill numbering about 70,000 fish in the
Kambel River near Gachsaran, a centre of oil production (Tehran Times, 24
November 2002). Varkouhi and Sobhani (2005) studied the presence of various
pollutants in the livers of fishes in the Khorramabad River.
The Jarrahi River is a southern Karun tributary from the east. The
Marun River is a major Jarrahi tributary. The Marun and Jarrahi feed the
Shadegan Marshes, the largest Iranian wetland according to Kurdistani and
Bajestan (2004). The Marun Reservoir Dam
northeast of Behbahan was scheduled for completion in 1996 with a
crest of 345 m (IRNA, 11 November 1998) but was to be completed in 2004 with a crest of 175 m and containing
1.2-1.3 billion cu m of water (IRNA,
12 January 1999; IRNA, 5 February 2002). There are also four diversion
dams on the Marun and one of these, the Jazaeen, has a fishway but fish are
trapped downstream of it during their migration (sic)(Kurdistani and
Bajestan, 2004). Other dams in this system lack a fishway. Later Kurdistani and
Bajestan state that there are no migratory fishes in the Marun, only resident
species (which presumably undergo local movements blocked by dams). They mention
Barbus grypus and B. pectoralis as the affected species. The Jareh Dam on the Zard River northeast of
Ramhormoz dates back to the Sassanid era and is still in use (IRNA,
26 June 2000).
The Karun has the greatest mean discharge, followed by the Dez and
Karkheh. The Karun mean discharge is the largest in Iran. The Karun
carries a heavy silt load with a hundredfold increase during flood.
The Karun discharge ranges from 207 cu m per second to 2225 cu m/sec,
average 1100 cu m/sec, while the Dez is 63-1227 cu m/sec, average 288
cu m/sec. The Jarrahi range is 8-770 cu m/sec, average 78 cu m/sec.
These figures vary among different sources indicating fluctuations
between years and gauging stations; however the relative importance of
these rivers is shown. The peak discharge of the Karun is in April,
with high values also in March and May; the lowest discharge is in
October when flow is only about a ninth of the peak. The combined
Tigris-Euphrates-Karun in flood carries five times the load of the
Nile (Fisher, 1968). Most of this is deposited north of Basrah (30°30'N,
47°47'E) and much is lost to evaporation
in the marshes, e.g. of 27 cu km of discharge into the Persian Gulf
through the Shatt al Arab, 22 cu km is from the Karun River. 22
million metric tons of dissolved chemicals are deposited each year and
hence there are siltation and salinity problems in the lower parts of this basin.
The Karun River on the Khuzestan plains was examined in 1992 for
various parameters and at various localities (courtesy of the Iranian
Fisheries Research and Training Organization, Ahvaz). It has a pH of
7.07-8.85, mean 8.17, dissolved oxygen 5.6-12.38 p.p.m., mean 9.29
p.p.m., bicarbonate 79.3-214.72 p.p.m., mean 154.4 p.p.m., carbonate
0.6-21, mean 5.53 p.p.m., total alkalinity 1.9-3.8 meq/l, mean 2.84
meq/l, carbonate hardness 5.32-10.64 p.p.m., mean 7.95 p.p.m., total
hardness 168-474 p.p.m., mean 287 p.p.m., ash residue 40-1142 p.p.m.,
mean 425 p.p.m., chloride 45.4-518.3 p.p.m., mean 207.28 p.p.m., total
dissolved solids 226-1374 p.p.m., mean 696 p.p.m., sulphate 43.75-325
p.p.m., mean 101.73 p.p.m., calcium 33.63-101.7 p.p.m., mean 61.8
p.p.m., magnesium 16.8-78.24 p.p.m., mean 33.8 p.p.m., phosphate
0.05-4 p.p.m., mean 0.24 p.p.m., iron trace to 0.32 p.p.m., mean 0.069
p.p.m., manganese trace to 0.657 p.p.m., mean 0.483 p.p.m., and
nitrate trace to 0.657 p.p.m., mean 0.039 p.p.m. Esmaili et al.
(1999) report heavy metals in water, sediments and fish from the Karun River and
Jafarzadeh-Haghiehi et al. (2005) report on the poor water quality of the river.
As lowlands at the head of the Persian Gulf receive waters from
this vast drainage basin, floods occur, increasing the depth and
extent of marshes. Flood waters may increase depths by 1-1.5 m, with
2-3.5 m in more permanent basins. Most of the large marshes lie in
Iraq, but the Hoveyzeh or Hawr-al-Azim marshes are on the border, and occupy 3000 sq
km at high water. They are fed by the Karkheh and other rivers from
Iran. Construction of the Karkheh Dam in Iran (and pipeline water transfer to
Kuwait) will reduce input of water to this marsh, compounded by canal
construction and draining of marshes in Iraq. Additionally, irrigation
return waters will be salinised (Partow, 2001). A dam has been built by Iran
across the Hoveyzeh marsh to retain water on the border with Iraq.
Marsh temperatures range from 15°C in January to 31°C in August and fish may
retreat to deeper areas or move upriver at the higher temperatures.
Flooded marshes tend to be warmer than rivers in winter. The Shatt al
Arab has temperatures of 32°C in July and 16°C in December.
Floods are often a feature of these southern rivers and some loss
of fish stocks must occur as they recede. For example, the Jarrahi and
Zohreh rivers overran their banks in November 1994 after torrential
rains causing widespread flooding (http://netiran.com/news/IranNews/html/94112109INEV.html).
The Zagros Mountains consists of tightly packed ranges in the Tigris basin
trending north-west to south-east. A trellis drainage pattern is
imposed on this. The tangs, their formation and the drainage pattern
are described by Harrison (1937) and Oberlander (1965; 1968a). These
deep defiles may exceed 2400 m in depth with vertical walls of 300 m
splitting anticlinal mountain ranges instead of taking apparently
easier routes around their ends. They may well be barriers to the
movement of less vagile fish species or a highway into the interior
for those with some dispersal ability. Tangs formed because an
antecedent drainage over lower relief was gradually uplifted at a rate
slow enough to permit streams to cut through ridges and retain the
original pattern of drainage once the softer material was washed out
of the valleys between the anticlines.
The uppermost parts of the basin show evidence of headwater
captures and this orogenic zone is very unstable. The divide between
endo- and exo-rheic basins is not the snowline of the Zagros but is
east of it, so streams must first cross the Zagros peaks to start on
their journey to the Persian Gulf.
Springs are important in the mountains, tapping aquifers and
helping to maintain river flow. The Karun River traditionally has its
source in springs. Keivany et al. (1992) surveyed 72 springs in
Chahar Mahall va Bakhtiari Province, in the upper Karun River basin,
and found them suitable for trout culture with a potential production
of about 6000 tonnes per year. Flows varied from 50 to 4000 l/second,
temperature from 6 to 15°C, pH from 6.2
to 7.8, conductivity from 128 to 570 mMoh/cm, total alkalinity from
20-220 meq/l, total hardness from 140-250 mg/l, oxygen from 7 to 11
mg/l, carbon dioxide from 5 to 20 mg/l (falling rapidly to less than 2
mg/l within a few tens of metres of the spring source), H2S
0 mg/l, Cl- 1-28 mg/l, SO4-- 14-135
mg/l, PO4-- 0.1-0.3 mg/l, Ca++ 16-82
mg/l, Mg++ 3-34 mg/l, K+ 0.2-1.0 mg/l, Na+
0.5-1.5 mg/l, Fe+++ 0-0.06 mg/l, Fe++ 0 mg/l, NO2-
0-0.2 mg/l, NO3- 0-13 mg/l, NH4+
0-0.5 mg/l, and HCO3- 48-220 mg/l. Springs (or sarabs) in
Kermanshah Province have been described by Khatami and Shayegan (2003) and are
regarded as a significant water supply for rivers. Sarabs are used for drinking
water and irrigation, and are threatened by pollution and fish farms. Qanats are
also found, in drier parts of the basin, but they are not as
significant for fish habitat as in other parts of Iran.
Marshes and ponds as well as seasonally flooded arable land
along the Karun River in the lowlands of Khuzestan provide temporary
and permanent habitats for fishes. Some are reviewed below.
The "Hawr-e Bmdej"? or "Sadi Shavour" Marshes
lie between the Karkheh and Dez rivers northwest of Ahvaz at 31°45'N,
48°36'E and encompass 12,000 ha. This is
the most extensive permanent freshwater marsh with tall reeds of Phragmites
and Typha in Khuzestan. There is relatively little open water.
Some parts are being drained for agriculture, a continuing trend for
marshes with concomitant loss of fish habitat. The "Hamidieh"
plains at 31°20'N, 48°20'E
comprise 20,000 ha of seasonally flooded (winter) plain and arable
land along the Karkheh River. Hamidieh Lake, an old oxbow of the
Karkheh, is included in this area and is permanent fresh water. The
lake is 3 ha and has extensive reed beds.
The "Susangerd" Marshes or Hawr-e Susangerd at 31°45'N,
47°55'E are northwest of Ahvaz near the
Iraqi border and form the extreme eastern edge of the Hawr-al-Azim,
most of which lies in Iraq. The marshes occupy about 30,000 ha and are
made up of permanent and seasonal fresh and brackish marshes and
seasonally flooded arable land. The marshes are on the floodplain of
the Karkheh River. Irrigation projects, grazing by livestock, reed
cutting and fishing all occur here. Parts of the marsh were damaged by
the Iran-Iraq War. The Iran-Iraq marshes declined in area from 1089 sq km to 758
sq km from 2000 to 2002 and was predicted to dry up in 5 years from 2002 because
of the Karkheh Dam. Reports conflict since once the dam was full, a relatively
normal flow regime would help maintain the marshes. Restocking with 490,000
Barbus sharpeyi and and B. xanthopterus took place in this marsh (www.shilat.com,
downloaded 12May 2006).
The Shadegan Marshes at 30°20'N, 48°20'E
occupy 282,500 ha (Jones, www.ramsar.org/lib_dir_2_3.htm, downloaded 4
April 2000) gives 296,000 ha) and form the southern part of the
seasonal floodplain of the Dez, Karun and other rivers at the head of
the Persian Gulf. There are adjacent tidal mudflats. The central and
southern part of the marshes are part of a Ramsar Site, along with the
mudflats (World Conservation Monitoring Centre, 1990). Sabzalizadeh and
Amirineia (2003) give some physical and chemical characteristics of 5 sample
stations in this marsh. Range of pH was 7.2-9.4, maximum water temperatures
occurred in July and August. Maximum levels of dissolved oxygen were found in
November and February but were more than 5 p.p.m in most cases, optimum for fish
growth and reproduction. The water quality was hard and brackish. The whole area may dry out in late summer, a natural
condition exacerbated by dams and irrigation schemes on the major
inflowing rivers. In a November 2000 visit, much of this area was dry although
it had been flooded in 1999. When the marsh dries, fish
concentrate in the deeper pools where they are easily caught, even the
smaller ones. The marsh is re-colonised from the rivers. The fishes of
this marsh in order of abundance are kopur, shirbot, touyeni, esbele,
binni, berzem, biah and very few himri and gattan (Y. Mayahi, pers.
comm., 2000). Rice paddies occupy part of the Ramsar Site and reed
cutting, fishing and grazing goes on. There is extensive reed cutting, some livestock
grazing, some rice paddies and potential pollution from main roads,
shipping and oil terminals. Over 100,000 ha were contaminated with oil from a
leaking pipeline in 2000 and 35,000 cu m of refinery wastes were dumped in the
marsh in 2004 (www.payvand.com, downloaded, 5 September 2006). Chemical weapon use occurred here in the
Iran-Iraq War and acid rain fell from the burning of the Kuwaiti
oilfields in the Gulf War. About 10% of the marshes were destroyed
(Anonymous, 1988b; Scott, 1993; Jones, www.ramsar.org/lib_dir_2_3.htm, downloaded 4 April 2000). Fishing is important. The Shadegan Wildlife Refuge, encompassing 296,000 ha, is on the
threatened list for National Parks since it was substantially damaged
in the Iran-Iraq War, both physically and by chemical agents.
The principal fishes appearing on fish stalls in Ahvaz from marshes
such as Shadegan are Barbus xanthopterus, Liza abu, Barbus sharpeyi
and Cyprinus carpio as well as cultured Hypophthalmichthys
molitrix as escapes or plantings. Farm ponds in Khuzestan have
Barbus barbulus, Ctenopharyngodon idella, Hypophthalmichthys molitrix
and Cyprinus carpio. Hawr-al-Azim, Hawr-al-Hoveyzeh and the
Shadegan marshes are important refuges for fishes in Khuzestan (Korki,
1992; N. Najafpour, pers. comm., 1995). 490,000 fingerlings of Barbus
sharpeyi and B. xanthopterus were stocked in this marsh in 2005, a
40% increase over the previous year (www.iranfisheries.net, downloaded 30 November 2005).
Izeh and "Shiekho" lakes at 31°52'N,
49°54'E occupy 1400 ha in the Zagros
foothills. These small freshwater lakes are shallow with extensive
sedge marshes. Izeh is the deeper of the two with much more open
water. They are fed by runoff and springs. Shiekho, the larger lake,
is almost overgrown with emergent vegetation except where cattle have
grazed and trampled areas leaving some open water. Some fishing occurs
in the lakes and water is abstracted for irrigation.
"Choghakor" or "Chaghakhour" Marsh or Wetland at 31°55'N,
50°54'E lies in upper Karun River
drainage in the Zagros Mountains in Chahar Mahal va Bakhtiari at ca. 2100-2270 m and occupies 1600 ha.
Maximum depth in spring and winter is 2 m but in summer it is almost
entirely dry and overgrown with emergent vegetation. Construction of a dam may
enable a more permanent marsh to exist (Taqvaie and Ramezani, 2002) although
others consider dam construction to be a threat to the habitat and its diversity
as the habitat changes from a wetland to a lake (Ebrahimi and Moshari, 2006).
After the dam was built, water depth increased from 1.5 m to 6 m or more.
"Gandoman" Marsh at 31°50'N, 51°07'E
at 2250 m and occupying 1500 ha (or 1200 ha, Khan et al. (1992) or 3510
ha Taqvaie and Ramezani (2002)) is a similar habitat but it has a stream running through it.
"Sulegan" wetland or marsh in the same area encompasses 164 ha and is
spring fed. These marshes have been proposed as a Ramsar Site although not yet
formally designated (Scott and Smart, 1992).
The southern areas of this basin are areas with high temperatures
and large cities (Abadan in Iran and Basrah in Iraq). Adjacent waters
are highly polluted with sewage, agricultural waste and other
chemicals (e.g. see DouAbul et al., 1988; Diagomanolin et al.,
2004; Karamouz et al, 2005; Afkhami et al., 2007). The increased use of
motor boats has led to oil pollution. DDT is still sprayed against
malarial mosquitos on stagnant pools adjacent to the main river course
leaving a brown stain on the rocks (observations in 1995; a letter of
complaint to the appropriate agency carrying out this spraying by the
Iranian Fisheries Research and Training Organization elicited no
response). Scott (1995) records sale of Chloridrin, a persistent
insecticide, to residents of the Hawr-al-Hoveyzeh in Iran as a means
of poisoning large numbers of fish for sale. Phytoplankton blooms are
common and in canals the chlorosity increases, transparency decreases
and pH is reduced because of the dying plant material. The Shatt al
Arab is more affected by physical factors as it is an estuary.
Historical problems with salinisation of soils (and presumably water)
extend back 5000 years in southern Mesopotamia including Khuzestan, a
consequence of over-irrigation and inadequate drainage (Goldsmith and
Hildyard, 1984). The irrigation systems rose and fell with the
vicissitudes of history. There was a large-scale irrigation network in
Khuzestan during the Sassanian period (A.D. 226-639), lost through
conflict and natural disasters after this date and reconstructed in
modern times (Adams, 1962).
A theory has been advanced that the silt-laden discharge of the
Tigris-Euphrates-Karun rivers has built out a delta into the Persian
Gulf. The head of the Gulf would have reached Baghdad and Samarra
about 7000-6000 B.P. and since then the land area is supposed to have
extended some 200 km southward. The present plains would not then have
been as extensive and rivers from Iran would have entered directly
into the Gulf. The Admiralty Naval Staff (1918), Mason et al.
(1944), Adams (1962), Hansman (1978), Maltby (1994) and Lambeck (1996) provided illustrations of this
recession of the head of the Persian Gulf in historic times along with
details of historical and archaeological evidence. The sea coast was
then supposedly as far inland as Ahvaz in Iran for example. Lees and
Falcon (1952) proposed that in fact downwarping occurs under the
weight of sediment. Certainly the silt load has not built up a land
surface. The coastline, under this theory as interpreted by Fisher
(1968), has been constant since the end of the Pliocene and presumably
as a marsh habitat for fishes too. However Lees and Falcon did state
that there were advances and retreats through historic and prehistoric
time. Ionides (1954), Larsen (1975) and Nützel (1975) refuted Lees
and Falcon and maintained that marine clays and silts indicate a
marine embayment as far inland as Amara in Iraq (31°50'N,
47°09'E) and that the third millennium
cities of Ur and Eridu have left cuneiform sources placing them on the
sea although now they are 100 km from the head of the Persian Gulf.
Lees and Falcon did not take into account sea level changes such as
the postglacial rise of 100 m and interglacial rises of 30-100 m.
Active growth of a delta at the head of the Gulf over the last 20,000
years may only have occurred from 10,000 to 2000 B.P. and again in the
last 300 years. Subsidence levels are probably not as great as
postulated (Vita-Finzi, 1978). Nevertheless, there were probably
marshes to the north and they may have just become more available and
extensive in recent centuries (Aqrawi, 2001). As Larsen and Evans (1978) and Wagstaff
(1985) point out, the Persian Gulf shoreline at the head of the Gulf
has been affected by, and rendered difficult to interpret by, a
complex of factors including confusion of marine and freshwater
fossils in an estuarine environment, subsidence, eustatic sea level
fluctuations, local seismic activity, climate and therefore hydrologic
changes, and cultural changes such as irrigation. Jacobsen (1960)
detailed some of the changes in the courses of rivers and canals,
based on evidence of ancient settlements which were presumed to be
linearly arranged along water courses. Mallowan (1964) also maps some
ancient river courses. The fish fauna has evidently had to cope with a
changing availability of habitat through the post-glacial period.
Floods and changes in river courses over this time have no doubt
facilitated movement of fishes between Iran and the Tigris-Euphrates
basin. It seems unlikely that the separate entry of rivers from Iran
into the Gulf would have led to isolation of the faunas to any
significant degree.
Canals and other irrigation structures have long been a feature of
the Mesopotamian plains, forming habitats for fishes dating back
thousands of years (Bagley, 1976). Their loss through natural and
man-made disasters must have affected fish populations but sufficient
natural habitat no doubt remained to ensure survival. The construction of dams
upstream in Turkey and the large scale,
modern drainage programmes in Iraq bordering Iran such as the
"Three River Project" are drying up the extensive marsh
systems and these are regarded as an eco-disaster leading to
desertification in Iraq and adjacent regions of Iran (North, 1993;
Pearce, 1993, 2001; Ryan, 1994; National Geographic, 185(4):unnumbered page,
1994; Scott, 1995; Munro and Touron, 1997; Maltby, 1999; Partow, 2001;
www.amarappeal.com/documents/Draft_Report.pdf,
downloaded 15 November 2001). The 32 km long "Fish Lake" was
constructed as a barrier to Iranian attacks on Basrah. The Iranians
dug several drainage ditches from "Fish Lake" northeast of
Basrah to the Karun River, to dry up land for infantry attacks on
Basrah. This whole marsh area of about 17,000 sq km, is the most
important wetland in the Middle East and one of the top ten in the
world. The Central and Al-Hammar marshes in Iraq by 2001 have had 97% and 94% of
their land converted into bare ground and salt crusts. Less than one-third
of the Hawr al Hawizeh (= Hawr al Azim in Iran) survives. It was
estimated in the 1990s that the marsh area would be a desert within a decade and
this seems to be an accurate assessment. The effects
on the fishes in Iran are unknown but much habitat is being lost which
could have served as a reserve against loss in Iran through natural
and man-made changes.
The Iran-Iraq War of 1980-1988 severely damaged the
Hawr-al-Hoveyzeh in Iraq, and presumably to some extent in Iran. Bombs
and shells, chemical weapons, pollution, burning of reed beds, reed
cutting and armoured boats used to smash through obstructing reeds all
had deleterious effects (Scott, 1995). The Iraqi shores of this hawr
have been drained by dyke construction and river control presumably
for military reasons in this border area. Some marsh will survive in
Iran because it is fed from wholly Iranian rivers but Iran News
(19 February 1995) reports that draining of Iraqi marshes will lead to
desertification inside Iran.
The Southeast Anatolia Project (known as GAP after its Turkish
acronym) incorporates 21 dams and 19 hydroelectric facilities
including the massive Ataturk Dam on the Euphrates completed in 1993.
It plans to draw off one-third of the waters originating in Turkey and
will also use water from the Tigris River (Ottawa Citizen, 10
November 1994; Morris, 1992; Biswas, 1994; Beaumont, 1998). The reduction in flow for
Iraq may reach 60%, especially when water is taken from the Euphrates
or ath-Thawrah Dam (its reservoir is Lake Assad) at Tabqa in Syria (Vesiland,
1993). This will have major downstream effects, less so in Iran than
in Syria and Iraq, but flow into the Shatt al Arab shared between Iran
and Iraq will be greatly decreased perhaps allowing greater
penetration of saline water and restricting migrations of fishes.
Between 20 and 15 thousand years ago, the Persian Gulf was dry as
water was locked up in ice-caps and sea level was 110-120 m lower than
today (Sarnthein, 1972; Kassler, 1973; Nützel, 1975; Al-Sayari and
Zötl, 1978; Vita-Finzi, 1978). The floor of the Gulf was then thought
to be a generally waterless, flat depression with a few swampy tracts
rather than a "Garden of Eden" as has been proposed. A
marine transgression occurred between 12 to 8 thousand years ago and
by 6 thousand years ago the present sea-level was attained. Streams
now isolated from the Tigris River basin by the sea in the Gulf and Hormozgan
basins would have been tributary to an extended Shatt al Arab,
extending 800 km down the gulf to form an estuary at the shelf margin
in the Sea of Oman, now under 110 m of sea. Earlier regressions no
doubt occurred and facilitated the movement of fishes.
Construction of fish farms is widespread throughout this basin in
Iran. For example in Lorestan Province, 772 tonnes were produced by
the Lorestan Province Fishery Company in 1997, 50 fish farms were
under construction and 125 pools built for aquaculture uses. The
long-term aim was to increase fish production to 20,000 tonnes worth
156 billion rials and employing 10,000 people (Tehran Times, 22
September 1998).
In Chahar Mahall va Bakhtiari Province in the highlands of this basin, 4360 tons
of trout fingerlings were produced with plans to produce 8000 tons in future
years (Tehran Times, 14 March 2005).
Berg (1940) places this basin in the Mesopotamian Transitional
Region, since the boundaries of three zoogeographical regions meet
here, namely the Holarctic (i.e. its Palaearctic part), Sino-Indian (=
Oriental) and the African (= Ethiopian). The Mesopotamian Transitional
Region includes the Tigris and Euphrates basins and the Quwayq River,
Syria, forming a single Mesopotamian Province. The province is
transitional between the Mediterranean Subregion and the Indian
Subregion. Genera such as Leuciscus (= Squalius) Aspius, Chondrostoma
and Alburnus point to a Mediterranean or
European association while such genera as Glyptothorax, Barilius,
Mystus and Mastacembelus point to an Indian association.
Endorheic Basins
Bejestan Highland
This basin comprises the drainages of the eastern highlands north of Birjand (32°53'N, 59°13'E)
flanked by the Kavir basin to the west, the Lut and Sistan basins to
the south, the Tedzhen to the north and the Afghan border to the east.
The Tedzhen basin is separated by three ranges, from west to east, the
Kuh-e Sorkh (35°30'N, 58°36'E) at 3017 m, the Kuh-e Bizak (35°11'N, 60°20'E)
and the Kuh-e Khvaf at 2517 m east of Khvaf (34°33'N,
60°08'E). These receive snow in winter
from moist Caspian Sea air. The highlands are relatively low compared
with other parts of Iran and nowhere exceed 3000 m except for the Kuh-e
Sorkh. The lowest points are in the sumps on the Afghan border at
about 610 m. There are a number of minor sumps and the drainage
patterns have been described as indeterminate. The total area is about
82,000 sq km. Tectonism commonly causes drainage disruptions (Krinsley, 1970).
The distinction of the western parts of the basin from the Kavir
basin is somewhat arbitrary since the Kavir-e Namak near Bejestan (34°31'N,
58°10'E) lies at a similar level to the
Kavir-e Bozorg and is separated by only a low rise in the land. This
kavir receives intermittent streams from the east and north. The
Bejestan basin does receive tributaries from Afghanistan but these are
minor and do not begin to approach the input received by the Sistan
and Tedzhen basins from the east. Streams drain mostly to the east, to
three small terminal basins straddling the border; from north to south
these are the Namakzar-e Khvaf, the Daqq-e Patargan and the Daqq-e
Tondi.
The Lut basin to the south is separated by the drainage divide of
the Birjand-Qa'in highlands, which trend north-west to south-east. Kuh-e
Kalat is at 2605 m (34°18'N, 58°22'E)
in the north-west and altitudes of 2779 m are reached in the south-east.
This whole basin has seasonal streams and a few springs with qanats
a prominent feature. Water temperatures in qanats is 22-25°C
year round and their is little fluctuation in water flow and chemical
composition. Springs in contrast are influenced by the local geology
and have a variable chemical composition, as well as being influenced
by climate and pollution (Ruttner-Kolisko, 1964; 1966).
Caspian Sea
The Caspian Sea (Darya-ye Khazar, Darya-ye Mazandaran) basin is
here taken to include both the rivers draining to that sea and the sea
itself within Iranian territorial waters. This basin, in its land
part, is elongate, extending from the Turkish border almost to the
Afghan border and only acquires some width where the Safid River and
its tributaries penetrate the Alborz Mountains in the west. According
to Pirnia (1951) the Caspian basin in Iran (excluding the sea)
encompasses 182,100 sq km while according to Zakeri (1997) this figure
is 256,000 sq km, 15.5% of the whole country. Zakeri (1997) records
864 small and large rivers, including the Safid River with a catchment
of 67,000 sq km. Much of the information on the Caspian Sea itself is
restricted to waters of the former U.S.S.R. and there is relatively
little on Iranian territorial waters. Rozengurt and Hedgpeth (1989),
Kosarev and Yablonskaya (1994), Mandych (1995) and Golubev (1996)
summarise much of the recent Soviet literature and a general review is given by Mamaev (2002).
An ongoing and developing source of
information on this sea, the surrounding land, its history, its management, biodiversity
strategy and action plan, and a wide sweep of environmental problems is the Caspian Environment Programme (CEP), Baku, Azerbaijan
at www.caspianenvironment.org. This site has numerous documents and reports on-line, some with authors, e.g.
Katunin (2000), Ivanov and Katunin (2001), ERM-Lahmeyer International GmbH, DHI Water & Environment and GOPA
Consultants (2001a), others appearing under CEP or TACIS (Technical Assistance to the Commonwealth of
Independent States, European Union), e.g. TACIS and UNDP (2000), TACIS (2002), CEP (1998, 2000b, 2002). These reports include information on
the fishes and fisheries but are best referred to for the interactions between
people and the environment. Kiabi et al. (1999) describe the wetlands and
rivers of Golestan Province at the southeast corner of the Caspian Sea. Razavi
(1999) gives an introduction to the ecology of the sea in Farsi. Nezami et al.
(2000) and CEP (2001) give recent general descriptions of the Iranian Caspian coastal zone,
the important rivers, wetlands, water quality, climate, pollutants, and fisheries.
www.bibliothecapersica.com/articlenavigation/index.html, under Caspian Sea,
downloaded 24 December 2004 also gives an overview of this basin. Nadim et al.
(2006) review the management of coastal areas in the Caspian Sea.
The Caspian Sea is the largest "lake" or inland water
body in the world at 436,284 sq km, a surface area encompassing 18% of
the total area of all lakes in the world, about the same area as Great
Britain (other surface area figures are 378,400 sq km, 384,400 sq
km and 390,000 sq km - data of this nature varies quite markedly between apparently
authoritative sources). The volume is 78,100 cu km, 44% of the total
volume of inland lakes of the world. Its north-south extent is 1204 km
and width is 204 to 566 km. The shoreline, including islands, extends
for 7000 km, 1000 km of which is Iranian. The catchment area is 3.6 million sq km. Dumont (1998)
presents arguments for this water body being a true lake and not a sea.
North, Middle and South Caspian basins are recognised, divided by
shoals. Iranian waters fall within the South Caspian Basin which
occupies 148,700 sq km and is separated from the Middle Caspian by the
Apsheron Bank. The South Caspian holds over 65% of the sea's water and
is the deepest basin, to -1000 m in depressions, average - 325 m. The northern basin holds only 1% of the water.
The sea receives 291 cu km from river run-off and 87 cu km from
precipitation but loses 374 cu km from evaporation and 11 cu km to
overflow into the Kara Bogaz Gol (Gerasimov, 1978b). The Volga River
accounts for 76.3% (82% according to Dumont (1995)) of the inflow of
rivers, the Kura River 4.9%, the Ural River 3.7%, the Terek River 3.2%
and the remaining rivers including all those of the Iranian shore
11.9%. Iranian rivers account for only 5% of the Caspian inflow, Iran
has 7% of the catchment area, 14% of the coast, contributes 3% of the
settling solids, and 2% of the fishery (Badakhshan and Shayegan in
Glantz and Zonn, 1997). The Volga has its headwaters near Moscow and
is 3688 km long with a catchment area of 1,360,000 sq km and a mean
annual flow at Volgograd of 8380 cu m/sec. The Volga is of prime
importance in the Caspian Sea basin to migratory fishes as a spawning
site and the biology of these species has been studied extensively.
Often these studies provide the basis for much of the knowledge of
Iranian fishes to the south.
Zenkevi(t)ch (1957; 1963) and Barimani (1977) have reviewed the
geography, hydrology and biology of the Caspian Sea, Moiseev (1971)
summarises the living resources of the whole sea, Karpinsky (1992)
aspects of the benthic ecosystem, and Knipovich (1921), Il'in (1927a),
and Nevraev (1929) give accounts of Iranian coastal waters and
regional fisheries in the early twentieth century. Zahmatkesh (1993)
describes the gammarids and bottom sediments, Fallahi (1993) the
plankton and Soleimani (1994) the benthic fauna in Iranian waters.
Mamaev (2002) is a recent general overview.
Water balance for this sea depends on a delicate balance of inflow,
evaporation, precipitation, climate, and abstraction for human needs.
Water 10 m deep or shallower has a bottom of sand and gravel while at
greater depths of 50-100 m clay and softer sediments increase. There
is more sand in these greater depths off Gilan compared with off Mazandaran.
Maximum depth is 1025 m, mean depth is 184 m, and depth below sea
level is -28 m (-27.66 m averaged over the past 2,500 years according
to Dumont (1998)). There are natural water level fluctuations - the
figure cited is from 1983; in 1978 it was -29.02 m, the lowest
recorded since observations began (Voropaev and Velikanov, 1985). Petr
(1987) has pointed out that a decline below -28.5 m would result in a
change in salinity distribution and in water currents mixing riverine
and sea water. A decline in productivity would follow. A fall of only
1 m would cause a 60% reduction in fish food supply and, since this
fall poses barriers to migration to better feeding grounds, a further
20% loss in food supply. Recently however, since 1978, the sea has
begun to rise, by 2.1 m from 1978 to 1993 to -26.95 m, with a possible
rise of 3 m in the next 25 years. Vaziri and Borghei (1995) give an average rise
of 1.2 cm a month for the period 1986-1993. The sea rose 26 cm in 1994. However,
over the past 2500 years the sea level has not exceeded -25 m and is
not anticipated to do so in the near future; the level is cyclical (Rychagov, 1997;
Gorji-Bandpy and Hooman, 2004). The reason for the rise is probably a climatic shift (Mandych, 1995; Shayegan and
Badakshan, 1996; Kobori and Glantz, 1998) but a
sheen of oil from pollution may be helping in the reduced evaporation
of 7-10% observed over two decades. Tectonic shifts of the sea floor
may also be a contributing factor. Predictions of water level changes
have proved unreliable so schemes to ameliorate rises or falls are
unwarranted and could be catastrophic (Abuzyarov, 1999). Georgievskiy (2001)
however, predicts a lowering of the sea level to -27.6-28.9 m by the year 2030
from -27.0 m in 2000. Klige and Myagkov (1992)
examined the water balance of the Caspian Sea and predicted a rise in
sea level to 1995-1997 and then future declines of the order of
several metres in the next century.
The rise in water level is engulfing buildings including industrial
sites which will pollute the waters of the Caspian further. Iranian
towns and cities damaged include Babolsar, Tonekabon, Ramsar,
Ashuradeh, Bandar-e Torkoman, Anzali, Astara and Kolachai (Zonn in
Glantz and Zonn (1997)). Fish caught near Nowshahr in 1999 were
contaminated with oil pollutants (Tehran Times, 1 November
1999). The complex of chemical, petrochemical and metallurgical plants
at Sumgait near Baku in Azerbaijan produces 335,000 tonnes of mostly
toxic waste including dioxins. Hundreds of waste lakes of oil near
Baku are being slowly engulfed by the rising Caspian. Nasrolazadeh Saravi (2001)
and Khatoonabadai and Dehcheshmeh (2006) describe oil pollution in Iranian coastal waters although it
is much less than near Baku, particularly in Mazandaran and Golestan. Heavy metals
enter down the major rivers from mining and industry and the effects
from the Kura River may have rendered the coast of Azerbaijan almost
untenable for life (Bickham, 1996; Pohlman and Naismith, 1996; Rowe,
1996). Radioactive waste, both liquid and solid, is found in low lying
depressions around nuclear power plants and is liable to enter the
Caspian (Rodionov, 1994; Dumont, 1995).
On the plus side, sturgeons may benefit from easier access to
spawning grounds (Ottawa Citizen, 9 July 1994; 3 July 1995) but
this is probably offset by the pollution load of the major spawning rivers.
In contrast to the recent rise in sea level, a series of reports have appeared in
past scientific and popular literature on the falling level of the Caspian Sea and diversionary
schemes to combat this (e.g. Kovda, 1961; Lamb, 1977; Hollis, 1978; Gribbin, 1979;
Micklin, 1979; 1986; Golden, 1982; Rich, 1982; 1983;
Voropaev and Kosarev, 1982; Voropaev and Velikanov, 1985; Pearce,
1984; Ryan, 1986; Perera, 1989; Rozengurt and Hedgpeth, 1989; among
others). The Caspian dropped 2.3 m between 1930 and 1962 and area has
decreased by 10% or 40,000 sq km. Recent historical levels appear to
be between -25 and -26 m, average -25.8 m. Changes in level of the
Caspian due to natural or other causes in historical and
pre-historical times have been reviewed above. Fall in the sea level
increases salinity, destroys habitat and blocks spawning migrations,
although some effects are less in the southern, Iranian Caspian
because of the larger water mass. The Volga accounts for 76% (some
reports say more than 80%) of the river input to the Caspian Sea. The
Volga is now extensively dammed, as are other rivers in this basin,
and its waters used for industry and agriculture. There are 8 large
dams on the Volga, the largest being the Kuibyshevskaya with a
reservoir area of 6450 sq km and a total volume of 58 cu km. Dams in
the Caspian basin provide almost one third of the hydropower of the
former U.S.S.R. (Rozengurt and Hedgpeth, 1989). Flow into the Caspian
has been cut by at least 25% and in spring, the time of spawning
migrations, by as much as 37% for the Volga-Kama systems. Berka (1990)
reviewed the effects of water level changes on the northern Caspian
fisheries. The North Caspian was designated as an "ecological
disaster area" in 1992 because of water pollution input from the
Volga. The delta is eutrophic with cyanobacterial blooms being common,
affecting fish survival (Saiko in Glantz and Zonn, 1997).
The decline in sea level has been reversed in recent years and a
rise of nearly 2 m was reported and, in Turkmenistan, a shoreline
advance of 2-3 km in places (Rich, 1991; Anonymous, 1992a; Golub,
1992; Ottawa Citizen, 9 July 1994; Priroda, 5:3-25,
1994). This will have positive effects for some fisheries and wetland
conservation but negative effects on recent, low-lying construction
including oil refineries and wells in Azerbaijan and a nuclear waste
dump in Turkmenistan which would cause massive pollution from oil and
radioactive compounds (Pearce, 1995). Environmental hazards to the
fisheries caused by sea level rise include eutrophication from
farmland covered by the sea, pesticides and herbicides from inundated
farmland, salt water penetration into wetlands, input of solid
municipal and industrial wastes and vegetation, destruction of fish
habitat, and input of soil altering the ecosystem (Shayegan and
Badakhshan in Glantz and Zonn, 1997).
It has been suggested that the rise in sea level is due, in part,
to seepage from the Aral Sea basin and that this could be halted by
setting off underground explosions. This smacks of the large-scale
alteration to the environment favoured by Soviet planners to combat
the fall in sea level - both are grandiose and have unknown
consequences for the environment. Climate change is probably a major
factor abetted by the closing off of the Kara Bogaz Gol (responsible
for an estimated 40-45 cm rise alone) and diversion of Siberian rivers
into the Ural River in the northeastern Caspian (Khan et al., 1992).
Much of the former southern U.S.S.R. is water poor and a solution
to this and the falling Caspian level has been advocated. This would
involve diversion of north flowing Siberian rivers at a cost $40
billion. The potential for environmental damage on a local and even
global scale caused this scheme to be shelved in 1986. The project
involved excavations using nuclear explosives, drowning of forests and
construction of canals thousands of kilometres long. Reduced flow into
the Arctic Ocean could affect ice cover which influences atmospheric
pressure and circulation patterns over the whole northern hemisphere. This
Soviet plan has recently been revived (Pearce, 2004).
There is an abundance of historical and other evidence for
variations in Caspian Sea level and its connections with other water
bodies in both recent times and over several million years
(Huntington, 1907; Ehlers, 1971; Lamb, 1977; Gerasimov, 1978b; Hsü,
1978; Coad, 1980c; Rögl and Steininger, 1984; Wossugh-Zamani (1991c);
Oosterbroek and Arntzen, 1992; Sal'nikov, 1995; Mamedov, 1997; Rychagov, 1997;
Caspian Environmental Programme, 2000; Grigorovich et al., 2003; Kotlík
et al., 2008). Brooks (1949) maintains that the Oxus (= Amu Darya)
flowed into the Caspian in the 14th century instead of the Aral Sea.
Shnitnikov (1969) and Gerasimov (1978a) report flow along the Uzboi
channel north of the Iranian border into the Caspian from the Aral Sea
basin at several periods from the third millennium B.C. to the 16th
century. Sal'nikov (1998) illustrates connections between the Amu
Darya and the Caspian Sea from the Pleistocene to the 20th century.
The connection between the Caspian and Amu Darya and Aral Sea was interrupted about 20,000 years ago when the
Amu Darya turned north, was reconnected about 10,000 years ago, and
essentially interrupted about 4000 years ago. These regular contacts
have resulted in an Aral Sea ichthyofauna with "weakly pronounced
endemics", although the Amu Darya ichthyofauna has a number of
clearly defined endemics which are not yet found in the Caspian Sea
basin (but see below under Tedzhen River basin). Dunin-Barkovsky (1977) records level fluctuations of up to 50 m during
the Holocene due to variations in the general moistening of Eurasia
and intermittent warming and cooling variously associated with changes
in precipitation and evaporation. Ice melt from the Fennoscandian ice
cap, as late as 4000 B.C., added large volumes of water to the Caspian
and an overflow to the Black Sea was then possible. Berg (1948-1949)
maintains that Atherina presbyter and Syngnathus abaster
entered the Caspian at about this time. Some fishes, such as Salmo
trutta, are probably immigrants from Arctic regions and certain
cyprinoids and percids are freshwater immigrants. Bianco (1990; 1995b)
points out that, at every glacial- interglacial ice melting phase, a
network of connected rivers and lakes allowed primary freshwater
fishes to disperse in the northern Palaearctic. Other fishes are
relicts of earlier transgressions. Such species as herrings (Clupeidae),
gobies (Gobiidae) and possibly sturgeons are believed to have evolved
from the marine fauna of the Tethys Sea which ran from the modern
Atlantic to the Indian Ocean before the Sarmatian basin formed. The
uplift of eastern Anatolia and the Alborz in the Early Miocene between
20 and 17 million years ago (MYBP) closed a seaway from the
Indo-Pacific which had extended into the Eastern Paratethys (=
Black-Caspian-Aral sea in modern terms). The connection reopened in
the Middle Miocene 16.8-16 MYBP) but by the Late Miocene a Sarmatian
basin was cut off from the open seas and developed a unique marine
fauna (Ekman, 1953). This was mostly lost as salinity decreased from
freshwater input and a new fauna developed. A series of connections
and breaks with the Black Sea, Mediterranean Sea and the Atlantic
Ocean in various combinations with brackish and freshwater episodes
gave varying opportunities for faunal interchanges and evolution. The
Caspian fauna differs from the Mediterranean one because its only
communication was via the Black Sea which acted as a
"filter". When the Black and Caspian seas were well
connected, the link to the Mediterranean was broken, and when the
Black and Mediterranean seas were connected, the Caspian connection
was not well developed. Mamedov (1997) and Rychagov (1997) review late
Pleistocene and Holocene changes in Caspian Sea level, Chepalyga
(1984) and Gerasimov (1978b) review water level changes and
connections with the Black Sea over the last 80,000 years, Kosarev
and Yablonskaya (1994) and Mandych (1995) for the last 500,000 years and
Grigorovich et al. (2003) for the last 12.5 million years.
Bianco (1990) gives an overview of the palaeohistory of the Paratethys
Basin. Fluctuations in water level are correlated with climate changes Kotlík
et al. (2008) using multiple gene phylogeography found the Black and
Caspian seas supported separate populations of Rutilus frisii during the
last glaciation, although this separation was not complete and gene exchange
occurred, with the majority of migrations in the Pleistocene.
The total Caspian Sea drainage area is said to be 3,700,000 sq km,
about 25% of the continental land mass of the U.S.A. (Rozengurt and
Hedgpeth, 1989). The basin includes about one fifth of the crops and
one third of total industrial output of the former U.S.S.R. (Rozengurt
and Hedgpeth, 1989). Its northernmost waters are north of St.
Petersburg (= Leningrad) in Russia while its southernmost waters rise
on the flanks of the Zagros Mountains in Iran. This ranges from the
subarctic to the subtropical region and is very diverse in climate and
geology. Natural runoff in the South Caspian Basin ranges from 8 to 18
cu km while in the North Caspian it is 207-375 cu km. However the
North Caspian is very shallow (mean 4-5 m, maximum 20-25 m) compared
to the south Caspian (mean 325-334 m, maximum 980-1025 m). This is
also reflected in the volume, 400-700 cu km compared to 49,000-77,500
cu km. Salinity is about 12-13‰, increasing in isolated bays and
decreasing near river mouths. Summer temperatures in the south reach
27°C and in winter 9°C but the northern parts ice over. The Gorgan River area reached 30.9°C (Laloei,
2006). Surface water temperatures for the South Caspian are reported as 7.0-10.3°C
in winter, 7.9-14.0°C in spring, 25.0-29.0°C in summer and 12.0-19.0°C
in autumn (Rozengurt and Hedgpeth, 1989). These authors also report
salinity ranges of 12.5-13.0, 12.3-13.2, 12.6-13.6 and 12.3-13.5‰
for the same seasons, oxygen levels of 7.0-7.8, 7.0-8.2, 5.0-6.0 and
6.0-8.0 ml/l, and pH values of 8.48, 8.44, 8.44 and 8.50. Vertical
mixing occurs down to 50-150 m in the South Caspian (Mellat-Parast,
1992). There is little oxygen below 200-300 m and no fish life
although changes to the hydrological regime of the Volga have
increased aeration and oxygen content of deeper layers in the south
Caspian, down to 600-800 m. The Caspian has no tides but sustained
winds can cause seiches, local and temporary rises in sea level. There
is a current along the Iranian shore from west to east. The shelf
along the Iranian coast is narrow (6-10 km) and steep (Kosarev and
Yablonskaya, 1994). Beaches are usually sand with shell gravel on the
bottom further out. The extreme western coast has some shingle beaches
and west of Alamdeh in the central part is some rocky shore but there
are no major cliffs or headlands. The shore has coastal dunes, spits
and bars with lagoons inland, either brackish or fresh, grading into
the higher and dryer foothills.
Much of the coast was once forested, but it has been actively cleared and marshes reclaimed as rice
paddy. Rice paddies are now being investigated for fish
cultivation. About 300-500 kg of carp "seed" and a 10% increase in
paddy production per hectare was recorded during the rice cultivation season.
Extending this into the fall gave a production of 750-1000 kg of fish and duck
and in winter 5.5-8.0 t of rainbow trout (Tehran Times, 1 October 2000).
Gilan is attempting a production of 2 kg of trout per sq m of paddy field, with
the aim of harvesting 46,000 t of fish (IRNA, 14 November 2001).
Mazandaran has the highest farm fish production in Iran at 28,000 tonnes
(2006-2007) and is expected to reach 50,000 t by 2010 (www.mehrnews.ir,
downloaded 8 February 2007). The area of forests in northern Iran has been reduced from 3.4
million hectares in 1962 to 1.8 million hectares in 1977 and about 1
million hectares or less in 1995. In Gilan, 975,000 cu m of wood from
the forests are burnt annually by cattle breeders for heating or
cooking purposes or for production of dairy products. Additionally
450,000 cu m of wood are used for industrial purposes. Reforestation
cannot keep up with the losses and forests have been reduced by half
over the past 50 years (Barzegar, The Agricultural and Cattle Breeding
Publication, No. 761, 22 December 1997, from www.netiran.com/Htdocs/Clippings/Deconomy/971222XXDE01.html).
As a result floods now occur with destruction of fish habitat after
30-40 hours of rain where previously no flooding occurred after even 4
days of rain (Hamshahri, Tehran, 628, 20 February 1995).
Abstraction of water for irrigation (60% of water use) has severely
reduced water levels and runoff rates necessary for reproduction of
fishes. Estuarine habitats have been degraded inhibiting the survival
of eggs, larvae and juveniles of anadromous and semi-anadromous
fishes (the latter are species which spawn in the lower stretches and deltas of
rivers where salinity is optimal at 8 g/l for many commercial species, e.g.
Sander lucioperca, Cyprinus carpio, Rutilus rutilus). Over 90% of coastal streams along the Caspian shore are dry in
July in Iran because of irrigation demands. As a result larvae of
spring spawners are flushed into fields where they die, migration and
late summer spawning of Aspius aspius and Barbus
brachycephalus are obstructed, and Salmo trutta caspius and
Rutilus frisii kutum populations are depleted because they
cannot spawn in the shallow, warm, weed-choked water. Nursery and
reproductive areas for Abramis brama, A. sapa, Blicca
bjoerkna, Aspius aspius, and Sander lucioperca among
others are confined because of their low tolerance to salinities above
7-8‰. Without an adequate runoff, the sea encroaches on the estuary. Nasri-Chaari (1994) cites physical obstacles, sand removal from river
banks, overfishing and water pollution for declines in fish migration in recent years.
An earlier, general work including fishes of the Iranian Caspian Sea and
coast is Berg (1948-1049). A more recent work is the atlas of the fish species
in the Iranian Caspian Sea in English and Farsi by Jolodar and Abdoli (2004).
The commercially important species of fish were summarised in Abzeeyan,
Tehran, 5(7):VII-IX (1995) and are divided into sturgeons (Acipenseridae,
4 species) and bony fishes (3 species of kilkas in the genus Clupeonella
of the family Clupeidae; herrings or Alosa spp. also in
Clupeidae; 5 species of the family Cyprinidae namely Rutilus frisii,
Cyprinus carpio, Abramis brama, Rutilus rutilus
and Aspius aspius; 2 species of mullets, family Mugilidae, Liza
auratus and L. saliens; a member of the perch family,
Percidae, namely Sander lucioperca; and a member of the salmon
family, Salmonidae, namely Salmo trutta caspius). About 70% of Rutilus
frisii is caught in Gilan Province, while 60% of mullets and 75%
of sturgeons are caught in Mazandaran Province. More than 50% of the
sturgeon catch is Acipenser stellatus and 10% is Huso huso,
the remainder being A. gueldenstaedtii and A. persicus,
with a yearly catch for all sturgeons of about 2500 tonnes. Sturgeon
fishing is carried out by the government and no private sector fishing
is allowed because of the value of this fishery and the need for
careful management. Accidentally caught sturgeon must be released or
turned over to the government operation. Ivanov (2000) summarises the biological
resources of the Caspian Sea from a Russian perspective with some comparative
figures from Iran. Generally, catches in Iranian waters are always less than
those in former Soviet Union countries combined. A particular exception is
Rutilus frisii (safid mahi), an esteemed fish in Iran.
About 25% of the Iranian total fish catch is from the Caspian coastal area (CEP)
and figures for the Iranian Caspian Sea in tonnes are:-
| Year |
All fish species |
Kilka |
Sturgeon flesh |
Caviar |
| 1976/77 |
8,428 |
1131 |
2368 |
221 |
| 1981/82 |
10,466 |
1341 |
1914 |
234 |
| 1986/87 |
11,084 |
2384 |
2500 |
303 |
| 1991/92 |
34,596 |
13,817 |
2208 |
283 |
| 1992/93 |
40,598 |
21,527 |
2198 |
262 |
| 1993/94 |
52,768 |
28,730 |
1170 |
217 |
| 1994/95 |
69,700 |
51,000 |
1700 |
218 |
| 1995/96 |
58,300 |
41,000 |
1500 |
182 |
| 1996/97 |
74,100 |
57,000 |
1600 |
195 |
| 1997/98 |
76,200 |
60,400 |
1300 |
151 |
| 1998/99 |
101,500 |
85,000 |
1200 |
157 |
The fish harvest from the southern Caspian coast of Iran for the 7
month period October 1999-April 2000 dropped by 11% over the same
period from the year before, from 8630 t to 7710 t (IRNA, 10
May 2000). The decline was attributed to a rise in fish prices which
encouraged illegal fishing and to habitat loss. The value for the whole
Caspian fisheries is given as $6 billion by Nezami et al. (2000).
A proposal for a Caspian Fisheries Commission is given by TACIS (1999; 2000b)
and ERM-Lahmeyer International GmbH et al. (2001b). It would aim to conserve and utilise
the living aquatic resources, including the management of fish stocks such as
kilka, herrings and mullets, as well as the famous sturgeons. These species all
have transboundary stocks requiring cooperative management between countries. Articles
aim to protect traditional fishing for sturgeon along the Iranian coast,
establish state monopolies for the export of caviar, set up cooperative research programmes to conserve sturgeon species, establish annual total allowable
catches and fishing regulations, and so on.
About 50,000 tonnes of kilkas are caught each year by the
Industrial Fishing Company and fishing cooperatives using deep conical
nets and air lifting with artificial lights as attractants. About
20,000 t of other species are caught by licensed cooperatives
using beach seines and gill nets although a report in IRNA (27
March 2000) cites more than 16,000 t including whitefish (Rutilus),
Mugilidae, Cyprinidae, "anchovy" (sic), bream (Abramis)
and zander (Sander). An account of site selection for beach
seining is given by Zanoosi (1993). Beach seining has been restricted to the
period from sunrise to 8 p.m., and to 10 p.m. in Miankaleh (www.iranfisheries.net,
downloaded 14 November 2006). The 1994-1995 finfish catch
(excluding sturgeon and kilka) using gill nets, coastal purse seines
and beach seines, was 17,000 t, perhaps over 22,000 t with the
illegal catch included. About 87% of this catch is Rutilus frisii
kutum, Liza auratus and Liza saliens (Annual
Report, 1994-1995, Iranian Fisheries Research and Training
Organization, Tehran, p. 37, 1996). Gill nets showed a 39% decline
compared to the previous year and beach seines were 16% less. Rutilus
frisii kutum comprised 53%, mullet 39% and others 8% of the total
catch (Abzeeyan, Tehran, 6(5, 6):IV, 1995). The harvest from
the southern Caspian Sea coast dropped 11% in the year 2000 from the
same seven month period in the preceding year, to 7710 t, as a
consequence of poaching, neglect of river maintenance, and substandard
capture methods (IRNA, 10 May 2000). The catch in Golestan Province
rose from 470 t in 2000 to 3278 t in 2005, attributed to artificial
propagation, restrictions on beach seining, training about closed seasons and
beach seine standards, increased fishing effort, and a favourable climate (www.iranfisheries.net,
downloaded 14 November 2006).
There are 5 regional fishing centres namely Bandar Anzali with 14
fishing stations, Keyashahr with 12 stations, Babolsar with 13,
Ashuradeh with 9 and Nowshahr with 9 (Iranian
Fisheries Research and Training Organization Newsletter, 7:7, 1995).
The Caspian Environment Programme (2001c) gives 15 stations for Bandar Anzali, 9
for Keyashahr, Babolsar, Ashuradeh and Nowshahr for sturgeon fisheries. Fixed
gill nets are used with a standardised mesh. The Ashuradeh Peninsula, where
more than half of Iran's caviar is processed, was threatened by the
rising Caspian Sea in a 1991 radio report. A 1995 agreement between
Iran, Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan and Russia gives each
nation an exclusive fishing zone of 20 nautical miles from shore (Iranian
Fisheries Research and Training Organization Newsletter, 7:7, 1995).
Inland freshwaters of Gilan are divided into three categories by
Bakhshizod-Mahmoodi (1996): natural and impounded ponds, the Safid
River reservoir, and wetlands. The ponds are used primarily for
cyprinid and acipenserid culture, the reservoir is fished by seining,
by spreading wheat grains in littoral areas to attract fish and by
using the shemshad or shaghoul net (a giant dip-net),
and the wetlands are fished by seining, by the salik or mashak
(cast-nets), by the la'kesh (drifting gill net using one and
two boats), by fixed gill nets, by the shemshad and by angling (for ordak mahi).
Pollution is an important factor in the ecology of the sea, from
offshore oil drilling, ship discharges of oil wastes and contaminated
water as well as garbage and even discharges from ship collisions,
radiation from underground, non-military explosions and nuclear waste
dumped in inflowing rivers (radiation levels are 100 times above
normal (Time, 1 November 1993)), manure and pesticides from
farming on the surrounding land mass, city waste water, sewage and
garbage, industrial wastes including mercury and other heavy metals,
discharges from water desalinating plants, extraction of minerals such
as sodium sulphate, mirabelite and espomite, and untreated sewage (see
Sardar (1979), Nuhi and Khorasani (1981), Coad (1980c), Khalili (1994), Raiss-Tousi (1999), Namazi (2000),
Abaee (2001), Charamlambous (2001) and Laloei (2006) for Iranian problems; Anonymous (1988c),
Edwards (1994), Specter (1994) and Kasymov and Rogers (1996) for former Soviet
waters; Stone (2000b) is a recent, short general overview).
Data collected in 1991 showed the Caspian Sea received effluents comprised of
3000 tonnes of oil products, 28,000 t of sulphites, 315,000 t of chlorides,
200,000 t of tar and 25,000 t of phenols (Namazi, 2000). In Daghestani
rivers, the same author records heavy metals, pesticides, phenol, arsenic, boron
and selenium, among others, at 60-100 times the maximum permissible for
fisheries. The oil industry is considered to be the main source of ecological problems in
the Caspian Sea (Karpyuk, M. and Shavandin, V. 1996. Astrakhaners on
the Caspian Sea. International Affairs, 42(1) from http://home.eastview.com/ia/42_01_15.htm).
Prospecting uses blasting operations which have caused sturgeon deaths
on more than one occasion. A single offshore well during its life
releases into the water 30-120 tonnes of oil, 200-1000 t of sand,
clay and other waste and 150-400 t of drilling mud paraffin
fractions, baryta, lime, detergents, emulsifiers and lubricants. The
ecology is affected 5-12 km from each well. The oil industry in the
Caspian has reserves estimated at $4 trillion and a new oil rush will
further contaminate the sea.
Charamlambous (2001) concludes that municipal wastewater from 11 million
people is the primary pollutant in Iranian coastal waters. Industrial discharge
accounts for 31%. of organic loading, the rest being municipal discharge. The
most industrialised area is around Rasht with waste going into the Anzali Mordab.
TACIS (2000c) reports that in Gilan, 32 of 36 major cities discharge wastewater
untreated into a river and 89 of 90 industries discharge treated wastewater to a
river. Ayati (2003) also reviews pollution in the mordab.
Mirkou (2001) details agro-chemical usage along the Caspian shore
comprising various fertilisers and pesticides.
Chlorinated pesticides have been used in anti-malarial campaigns
throughout Iran and to eliminate pests on cotton, rice and other
products in Mazandaran. Herbicides and pesticides are widely used in
rice paddies. DDE, DDT, DDD, Lindane, Dieldrin, Eindrin and Kelthane
have been identified in such rivers as the Babol and Chalus (Annual
Report, 1995-1996, Iranian Fisheries Research and Training
Organization, Tehran, p. 11-13, 1997). Ebadi and Shokrzadeh (2006) examined
Rutilus frisii, Vimba vimba, Clupeonella delicatula and
Liza aurata for lindane at Chalus, Babolsar, Khazarabad and Miankaleh but
levels detected were less than the FAO/WHO recommended permissible intake and
were no cause for public concern. Similar studies on DDT and DDE and on
chlorobenzilate from the same sites and fish and levels were also less than the
permissible intake (Shokrzadeh and Ebadi, 2005; 2006). The Chalus River also contains various heavy metals,
such as lead, zinc, copper, iron, cadmium and chromium from mining
activities (Annual Report, 1995-1996, Iranian Fisheries Research
and Training Organization, Tehran, p. 18, 1997). Hashemy-Tonkabony and Asadi
Langaroodi (1976) have shown the presence of DDE, DDT, TDE, Dieldrin,
Lindane, Aldrin and Heptachlor in a wide variety of Caspian fishes in
Iran. However, Ebadi and Shokrzadeh (2006) examined Rutilus frisii, Alburnus,
Clupeonella and Liza species in Mazandaran for the organochlorine
pesticide lindane and found levels in muscle tissues to be less than FAO and WHO
recommended permissible intake and so were not a public concern.
Rutilus frisii, Cyprinus carpio, Liza species and Acipenser
stellatus were tested for DDT, aldrin and heptachlor with only the latter
slightly elevated above standard levels at Hashtpar (Iran Daily, 11 January 2006). Phytoplankton diversity in the western Caspian Sea fell from 74
to 40 species, biomass from 8.7 to 2.1 g/ sq m and biomass of benthic
organisms in coastal areas fell from 1724 g/ sq m in 1961 to 21 g/sq m
in 1969 (Clark, 1986). These declines were noted particularly in the
nursery grounds for sturgeon, Abramis brama, Esox lucius
and Cyprinus carpio among other fish species. In the 1980s,
catches of Abramis brama, Cyprinus carpio, Rutilus
rutilus and Sander lucioperca fell by as much as 80% and Salmo
trutta caspius and "shad" had almost disappeared. It was estimated
that for 1985, 10,200 tonnes of oil products and 104,200 t of
sewage were dumped in the sea. One-fourth (or 40 billion cubic metres)
of all the wastewater in Russia enters the Caspian Sea and
petrochemical factories alone release 67,000 t of waste annually
(Anonymous, 1988c; Platt, 1995; Hamshahri, Tehran, 3 (639), 7
March 1995). Salinity increased as more water was taken for irrigation
- two-thirds of the Terek and Kura flows did not reach the sea
(Markham, 1989). In Iran, sewage is discharged into the Caspian Sea
from coastal towns, and via rivers, from towns inland. Industrial
solid wastes enter the sea through the larger rivers such as the Safid,
Gohar and Siah as well as the Anzali Mordab complex. The use of
agricultural chemicals such as fertilisers and pesticides has led to
pollution, e.g. in Gilan Province 88,851 t of fertilisers were used in
the year 1992-1993, an 18.7% increase over the previous year. A survey
of 30 towns in Gilan shows that 80% of rubbish dumps are located by
rivers, marshes or the coast (Hamshahri, Tehran, 3 (639), 7
March 1995). An estimated 200,000 fish were killed in the Kacha River,
a branch of the Siyarud in Rasht, poisoned from a dump in the Saravan
region which receives 390 t of rubbish daily. Heavy rains had
washed poison into the river (Tehran Times, 7 October 1998).
As many as 1000 trout (presumably mahi azad, Salmo trutta) died in the
Kileh River in Mazandaran from release of wastes from a dairy manufacturer; sand
extraction was also blamed for affecting fish populations (Iran Daily, 21 July
2005).
The biology of the Volga River and its effects on the Caspian
ecology has been reviewed by Rozengurt and Hedgpeth (1989) and Pavlov
and Vilenkin (1989). This river is of critical importance for marine
fisheries. Fish production is less in the central and southern parts
of the sea as nutrient supply comes from upwelling and circulation
rather than a riverine input. However the Volga has effects even here,
changing the Caspian Sea from its regime in the 1950s. Abstraction of
water for irrigation, industry and household use caused salinity
increases of about 0.2-0.3‰, increased aeration of deep layers and
in their oxygen content down to 600-800 m by as much as 2-3 ml/l due
to convection and thermal winter mixing, an increase in the euphotic
zone to 50 m and depths open to total photosynthesis to 100 m, a
decrease in organic matter and its vertical gradient, and an increase
in wind-driven circulation and its effects on temperature and salinity
layers. In the period 1956-1972, the Caspian Sea was transformed from
a fishery based on valuable species (listed above) to one dependent on
kilka which now occupies 80% of the catch (or 107 times the catch in
1930). Even including the kilka, catches in the 1970s were 245 x 103
tonnes or only 37% of the 1913 catch. The catch of Caspian herrings (a
complex of species in the family Clupeidae) ceased to exist
commercially by the 1970s and in fact was banned. In 1967-1972 it was
0.6-2.1 x 103 compared to 56-62 x 103 in
1945-1953 or 82-307 x 103 in 1900-1917 (Rozengurt and
Hedgpeth, 1989). Moghim et al. (1994) report that, in the
southern areas of the Caspian Sea, nearly 90% of the catch is composed
of Rutilus frisii, Liza saliens and Liza aurata
(with biomasses of 24,000, 7000 and 2400 t respectively and
maximum sustainable yields of 7000, 2900 and 960 t respectively).
The Volga is a major pollutant of the Caspian Sea, carrying sewage,
agricultural waste, PCBs, petrochemical wastes, tannery waste, etc.
from a population base of 60 million people (Golub, 1992). In 1989, 40
million t of polluted wastewater entered the Caspian via the Volga
River, more than a quarter of all the wastewater of Russia (http://www.oneworld.org/patp/pap_overview.html).
A report in 1995 gives the volume of pollutants and industrial wastes
entering the Caspian Sea each year as 11 billion cu m. Russia accounts
for 50%, Azerbaijan 16% and Iran 11% (http://netiran.com/news/IRNA/html/950731IRGG17.html).
The Volga-Don canal in the former U.S.S.R. connected the Caspian
Sea with the Black Sea in 1952 and formed an invasion route for
various benthic organisms while others came in attached to boats
transported by rail or were deliberately introduced (Kasymov, 1982).
The molluscs Abra ovata and Mytilaster lineatus, two
invaders, accounted for over 90% of the total benthic biomass.
Invaders provided 95.1-99.3% of the total benthic biomass in the
western part of the south Caspian Sea in 1976. East of the mouth of
the Safid River, the Azov-Black Sea molluscs Abra ovata and Cerastoderma
lamarcki accounted for 80% of total benthic biomass. In Gorgan
Bay, 99.9% of the benthos fauna is comprised of invaders. The Volga is
also connected to the Baltic and White seas via the White Sea-Baltic
Canal opened in 1933 (Pavlov and Vilenkin, 1989).
The fisheries may well collapse if the 10 cm long ctenophore or
comb jelly Mnemiopsis leidyi from the northwestern Atlantic
Ocean enters the Caspian Sea via the Volga-Don canal in ballast water.
It reached the Black Sea in the early 1980s and destroyed the local
pelagic food chain (Travis, 1993; Dumont, 1995; Pearce, 1995; GESAMP,
Joint Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of Marine
Environmental Protection, 1997; Negarestan et al., 2002; Kideys, 2002a; 2002b; 2003). The ctenophore eats fish eggs and
larvae directly as well as zooplankton and crustaceans which are foods
for fish (Bagheri et al., 2005). The Black Sea fish catches fell 90% in 6 years and the
biomass of the ctenophore reached an estimated 900 million tonnes, ten
times the world annual fish catch (or 1 billion t, about equal to
the world fish catch - sources differ). The wet weight biomass of the
whole Black Sea at times was 95% ctenophore. This suggestion of the mid-1990s
was borne out, as detailed below. A continuing series of reports, magazine
articles and studies on this invader are not all cited here.
The earliest report for the Caspian appears to be in 1995 by the Iranian Fisheries Research Organization (Bilio and
Niermann, 2004; www.caspianenvironment.org/mnemiopsis/mnem_attach13.htm). The Islamic Republic News
Agency (IRNA) on 12 May 1998 reported that a number of
jellyfish had been observed in the Caspian Sea recently, presumably
brought in the ballast of oil tankers, and its occurrence is documented by Esmaili
Sari et al. (1999) and in numerous other studies by this author and
co-authors. Various studies on the biology of the comb jelly have been carried
in the Iranian Caspian Sea including, e.g. Movahedinia et al. (2002) and Yussefian (2002).
The kilka fisheries are now threatened by the comb jelly which spread through the entire sea by
the year 2000. J. Muir (http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/middle_east/newsid_1453000/1453117.stm,
downloaded 30 August 2001), Kideys (2002b) and Kideys and Moghim (2003) report a 50% drop in kilka numbers with catches down
from 3-6 t per night to half a tonne for one boat. A 50% decrease in kilka
catches meant a minimum U.S.$15 million loss to the fishermen (Kideys and Moghim,
2003). Iran's kilka fishery fell from 85,000 t in 1999 to 15,000 t in 2004
and losses exceed $125 million (Stone, 2005a). This comb jelly can double in
size in one day, reaches maturity in 2 weeks and then produces 8,000 young every
day. Maximum abundance reached 5122 individuals per square metre in October 2001
and biomass 1024.5 g/sq metre in august-October 2002 (Roohi et al., 2003;
Bagheri, 2004; 2006). The fisheries may recover somewhat after the comb jelly
population collapses (Tidwell, 2001b). The website www.caspianenvironment.org/mnemiopsis/index. htm, downloaded 9 April 2003
and Dumont (2002) have extensive information on this problem and Stone (2002b) and IFRO Newsletter
(29:4, 2001) confirm a severe depression in kilka and herring stocks. Beroe ovata, a comb jelly that
preys on Mnemiopsis, is being cultured in Iran (Kideys, 2002b; Kideys
et al., 2004; Rezvani Gilkolaei et al., 2005; Mirzajani, 2006; Mirzajani et al., 2007) and does
not appear to feed on other organisms in the Iranian Caspian (Iranian
Fisheries Research Organization Newsletter, 38:3, 2004). Reproduction and
growth are slower, and mortality higher, than in the Black Sea, due either to
the lower salinity in the Caspian Sea water or damage to individuals during
transportation for the experiments. If this
comb jelly fails to control Mnemiopsis, the introduction of the exotic
American species, the butterfish (Peprilus triacanthus), known to feed on
ctenophores has been advocated but this fish could also feed on other fishes (Harbison, 2002; Bilio
and Niermann, 2004). The complex politics of the nations surrounding the Caspian
have prevented the introduction of Beroe (Stone, 2005a).
The Kara Bogaz Gol ("Black Throat Bay"), an eastern arm of the Caspian Sea in
Turkmenistan, is 160 km long by 140 km broad (18,389 sq km) but only
2-3 m deep. It acts as a salt precipitator. This water body was
blocked off by a dam to conserve the water lost in it by evaporation
in 1980. The Caspian Sea has a net annual water deficit of 15 cu km
with 5 cu km being lost through the Kara Bogaz Gol alone (Rich, 1982;
1983). However this resulted in salts being spread by the winds,
ruining fish spawning grounds and fish farms in the Caspian basin, and
ultimately would lead to the salinisation of the Caspian Sea. A dike
has now been constructed to allow some flow into the Kara Bogaz Gol
and allow the flushing effect to operate. The refilling process over 3
years prevented a 35 cm rise in the Caspian Sea level (Dumont, 1995).
Use of this water body to reduce level rises in the Caspian Sea and prevent
flooding has been proposed (Wardlaw, 2001). Fish which enter the salty Kara Bogaz Gol lose their swimming
capacity, become blind and thrashing about often come to lie on the
shore. Birds eat them but those that are missed become salted and
dried and may be preserved for a year or so. The Turkmenistan
government re-established natural flow into the Kara Bogaz Gol in 1992
because of the Caspian Sea level rise (Zonn in Glantz and Zonn (1997)).
The Caspian coastal plain in Iran runs for almost 650 km from
Astara (38°26'N, 48°52'E) in the west to Bandar-e Torkeman (= Bandar-e Shah) (36°56'N,
54°06'E) in the east. This plain has a
width of about 25-32 km, but is as narrow as 2 km in places, although
it opens out in the east. The Alborz Mountains are almost 1000 km
long, on average less than 100 km wide but very high. Damavand reaches
5766 m - an estimate - at 35°56'N, 52° 08'E
and is the highest of any mountain to the west of it in Europe and
Asia. It has a continuous snow cover. There are persistent snow fields
and Alam Kuh at 4849 m has small icefields. The north or Caspian slope
is very steep and streams tend to be short and torrential, fed by snow
melt and year-round rain. However there are some longer rivers and the
principal ones are detailed below. There are about 128 small to large
rivers along the Caspian shore. Nümann (1966) gives some limited
biological, chemical and physical data on these streams based on spot
recordings. Surber (1969) gives values of total alkalinity and
calcium-magnesium hardness for a number of streams and reservoirs
along the Caspian shore. Most were moderately to relatively hard and
therefore productive for aquatic organisms such as insect larvae on
which fish feed. The Caspian Environmental Programme (2001b) gives an overview
of habitats and biodiversity along this Iranian shore. Environmentally managed
areas are listed along with factors affecting their status under the headings of
development, drainage, land use alteration, pollution, destruction of
vegetation, over-grazing, mining, hunting and fishing, exotics, dams, and roads.
Of 123 fish species only 10 or just over 8% are protected with one protected
species on the verge of extinction.
Most rivers along the Caspian shore have less than 30% of their
discharge in the two wettest months and 40% in the six driest months
so discharge is well distributed through the year. In contrast, the
Gorgan River at the eastern end of the Caspian basin has 70% of its
discharge in the two wettest months, figures comparable with drier
areas such as Azarbayjan at 50-60% and the Zayandeh and Kor rivers at
40-60%. Annual discharges can vary markedly, e.g. the Lar River had
545 mm on its basin area in 1949-1950 and 1560 mm in 1950-1951 (Ghahraman, 1958).
The Aras (= Araxes or Araks) is a tributary of the Kura River of
Azerbaijan. The Kura rises in Turkey and is 1510 km long. The Aras
forms the border between Iran and the former U.S.S.R. (now Azerbaijan
and Armenia) for 430 km and has its source near Erzurum (39°55'N,
41°17'E) in Anatolia and the headwaters
of the Euphrates River. Its total length is 1072 km. The Aras can be
wide and meandering with braided channels and backwaters. Depth range
of the Aras is 0.5-4.0 m, average 2.5 m (Zakeri, 1997). The Araxes or
Aras Dam was a joint Iranian-Soviet project on this river. Iranian
authorities stocked the dam with 1.8 million fingerlings (species not
specified) weighing over 10 g each in 1997 to enhance fish farming (Islamic
Republic News Agency, 29 December 1997). Akh Gol occupies 600 ha
at 820 m in the Aras River valley in northeastern Iran (Scott, 1995).
It comprises a small brackish lake with associated marshes and springs
and rains to the Aras 5 km away. The area is being converted to
agriculture and the lake is being drained. Principal tributaries of
the Aras in Iran are the Qareh Su (= black water, draining easily eroded,
volcanic soil) draining from the Kuhha-ye Sabalan
at 4810 m (38°15'N, 47°49'E) near Ardabil (38°15'N, 48°18'E)
and the Qotur River draining past Kuh-e Zaki at 3079 m on the Turkish
border through Khvoy (38°33'N, 44°58'E) to the Azerbaijan border near Jolfa (38°57'N,
45°38'E). The Aras and the Safid are two
of the three largest rivers in Iran (with the Karun River of Khuzestan).
The Kura-Araks basin encompasses 225,000 sq km of which 28,000 sq km
or 12.4% is found in Iran (Gleick, 1993). Azerbaijan discharges 303
million cu m of waste into the Caspian Sea annually according to Golub
(1992), presumably through the Kura and other major rivers.
Derzhavin (1929a) gave an interesting account of the formation of a
new channel of the Aras north of the Iranian border in 1896 which led
to the freshening of the Kyzylagach Bay. This favoured migrations of
fishes into the Kura River. However, irrigation schemes on the Mugan
steppe severely reduced catches as well as causing salinisation of
soil. Water abstraction prevented entry of adequate numbers of
sturgeons onto the Kura spawning grounds. This type of water usage is
paralleled along the Caspian shore in Iran with deleterious effects on
a variety of sedentary and migratory fish species.
The Safid (= Sefid or White from its sediment load, up to 60 g/l)
River is the only one to completely pierce the Alborz Mountains and
has a considerable basin (54,100 sq km) on the plateau. Various sources give
differing accounts of its length, up to 800 km. The Safid has
the greatest mean discharge of Iranian Caspian rivers, over three
times that of the Heraz, the next most important. In flood the Safid
discharge is twice that of the Karun, but its minimum is less than a
tenth, because the Karun drains a greater area with higher elevations
and a more extensive snow pack. The Safid discharge is 4000 cu m per
second at maximum, falling to only 15 cu m per second. An average
discharge is 182.17 cu m per second. There used to be two freshets
before the dam was constructed at Manjil, one fed by spring snow melt
in March-May and one by rainfall in the autumn. The rise in water
levels and increased sediment load attracted sturgeons, in particular Acipenser
persicus. The catch of this species and A. gueldenstaedtii
in the Safid River area reached 733,127 kg in 1927/1928 representing
46,500 fish and a caviar yield of 120,958 kg (Vladykov, 1964).
The width of the Safid River varies from 100 to 250 m and depth
from 2 to 8 m. The average instant yield is 128.79 m/sec, range
76.5-288.5 m/sec. The average annual yield is 3,998.4 million cu m (Zakeri, 1997).
The Safid is formed from the Qezel Owzan from the west and the Shah
River from the east which meet on the plateau and flow through a
narrow gorge. This gorge is dammed by what was named the Shahbanou
Farah Dam at Manjil (now the Safid or Manjil Dam) (dam height 106 m,
length 425 m; reservoir 1860 million cu m, surface area 56 sq km
maximum, 14 sq km minimum, maximum depth 80 m, minimum 30 m, summer temperature 24°C, winter 7°C,
pH 7.8, 31 g/l turbid materials, Cl- 229 mg/l, SO4
178 mg/l). Strong water level fluctuations prevent the development of
a belt of vegetation and the heavy sedimentation inhibit a bottom
fauna. Khodjeini and Mohamed (1975) detailed the rate of sediment
accumulation in this dam, 757 cu m/sq km/year, evidence of severe
erosion of a devegetated drainage basin. The reservoir was half filled
with sediment after only 20 years despite an expected life span of 100
years. The reservoir is apparently drained at intervals to remove some
of the accumulated sediment. This would severely affect littoral
spawning and feeding habitats for fishes. Nümann (1966, 1969) gives
details on the limnology of this reservoir. The dam decreased
turbidity in the river, raised water temperatures at the river bed in
summer and caused marked diurnal temperature changes. This prevented
ascent of Salmo trutta to the upper reaches and the dam itself
prevented ascent of Rutilus rutilus. Nümann (1966) recommended
introducing Sander lucioperca, Acanthobrama terraesanctae
(a Levantine species) and cichlids to the reservoir.
Lower dams on the Safid, such as the Tarik (10 m high) and the
Sangar (3 m high), divert water for irrigation purposes on the Gilan
plain, the former through a 16.7 km long tunnel.
The Safid breaks up into distributaries near its mouth and its flow
is carried off into a complex of canals and irrigation ditches. The
Safid has changed its delta several times, (Vladykov, 1964). In 1911
it shifted 2-3 km east from the fishing post of 12 Bahman to Hasan
Kiadeh. An account in Farsi on the Safid River is given by Wossugh-Zamani (1991b).
The headwaters of the Qezel Owzan lie in Kordestan, near the Iraqi
border, and so drain part of the northern Zagros Mountains as well as
areas near Lake Orumiyeh such as the Kuh-e Sahand (37°44'N,
46°27'E), mountains near Hamadan (34°48'N, 48°30'E) and the southern slopes of the
Alborz Mountains. The Qezel Owzan is about 550 km long. The Taham Dam
project 12 km northwest of Zanjan lies in the Qezel Owzan basin on the
Taham Chay. This dam is to be 120 m high with a crest length of 450 m
and a capacity of 82.7 million cu m. The fish fauna behind the earth
dam at "Maljiq", 50 km southwest of Hashtrud in the upper
Qezel Owzan basin, suffered severely in the drought of the year 2000.
Twenty-five tonnes of fish died after the reservoir dried up (www.irna.com/newshtm/eng/09151847.htm,
IRNA, 30 July 2000).
The Shah River is much shorter (ca. 175 km) than the Qezel Owzan
and drains the southern Alborz as far east as Takht-e Soleyman at 4819
m (36°22'N, 50°58'E).
The 500 ha Bandar Kiashahr Lagoon (= Bandar-e Farahnaz) Ramsar Site
(World Conservation Monitoring Centre, 1990) at 37°25'N,
49°19'E east of the mouth of the Safid
Rud was a freshwater coastal lagoon and swamp fed by two streams from
the Safid Rud to the west and draining to the Caspian Sea via a
channel to the north. The recent rise in Caspian Sea level has
converted this area into a bay of the sea as it was in the 1950s
before the fall in sea level (Khan et al., 1992). The lagoon
bed is sand and mud and the water was oligotrophic except near the
marshes to the west. There were reedbeds of Phragmites communis,
Typha and Juncus, now restricted to the extreme west
end. There were several factors affecting this habitat including a
fishery with a fish-processing warehouse, grazing, reed cutting,
irrigation abstraction and recreational activities. It was an
important spawning and nursery ground for fishes (effects of recent
changes unknown) and is still an important centre for commercial fishing.
The Heraz River drains the Alborz east of Tehran and has a number
of longitudinal tributaries in the mountains. These depend on snow
melt and are cold even in summer. Fishes are reported to be present in
these high streams, but were not easily caught. The Heraz debouches
onto a plain and splits up into distributaries. It is polluted from rainbow
trout farms (Kazemzadeh Khajuie et al., 2002) and heavy metals (lead and
cadmium) are present in fish (Riahi Bakhtiyari, 2001; 2002). The Tajan or Tadjan
River was studied by Ro(o)shan Tabari (1995; 1996) who reported on its
hydrology and biology. Its mouth lies at 36°49'N, 53°05'E. The maximum flow is in April,
decreasing from May onward. In April 1989 flow was 45 cu m/sec falling
rapidly to 0.11 cu m/sec in June. Over 70% of the fishes are
anadromous with sturgeons being the most important species (Acipenser
persicus, A. gueldenstaedtii and Huso huso). Salmo
trutta is the most important species in the upper reaches. Other
species found in this river are Cyprinus carpio, Alburnus sp.
(presumably Alburnus alburnus), Capoeta capoeta, Barbus
capito, Vimba vimba, Alburnus chalcoides, Rutilus frisii, Rutilus
rutilus, Liza sp., Gobiidae, and Esox lucius. Rural,
agricultural and industrial pollutants are found in the Tajan and
affect the fishes along with dams and other physical obstacles, sand
removal and overfishing. The Shahid Rajaee Reservoir Dam, inaugurated
in 1997, is found on this river 41 km south of Sari (http://netiran.com/news/IRNA/html/951016IRGG15.html
and http://netiran.com/news/IRNA/current.html#HLNO4). The Independent
(London) reported on 13 July 1994 that tens of thousands of fish died
in this river after poachers poured poison into it about 9 miles (14.4
km) above the estuary. Dead fish covered the river bed for 6 miles (9.6 km).
The south-eastern corner of the Caspian Sea receives two major
rivers, the Gorgan and the Atrak or Atrek (ancient Sarnois). Their courses are roughly
east-west and parallel each other with the Atrak forming part of the
border with Turkmenistan. The Atrak is 495 km long (with 145 km of
this in Turkmenistan; Nezami et al. (2000) state 715 km for the Atrak) and the Gorgan 240 km. The Gorgan drains 10,200
sq km and has an average discharge of 9.39 cu m per second (cf. Safid
River with 182.17 cu m per second; the Chalus River, directly north of
Tehran, has a discharge of 12.65 cu m per second). The Voshmgir or
Sangarsavar Dam at 37°12'N, 54°45'E on the Gorgan stores 60 million cu m of water.
The water level fluctuates markedly, banks are steep and there is little
emergent vegetation. The Golestan Dam (same as preceding?) is 20 km north of Gonbad-e Qabus on
the Gorgan River and has a capacity of 86 million cu m. Keivany et
al. (1990; http://gause.biology.ualberta.ca/Keivany/bsc/html -
1996) report an irregular pH range for the Gorgan River from 6.3 to
7.9 with an average of 7.1. Temperature range was 8 to 33°C.
Conductivity varied greatly from 667 to 10,000 µM/cm, with an average
of 875 µM/cm. Chlorides, especially sodium chloride, were the most
abundant soluble salts. Total dissolved solids varied from 21 mg/l to
4300 mg/l in an inverse relationship with water volume. Water volume
at the dam inlet varied from 2 to 75 m3/second and almost
52% of the sediments entered the dam during a high flood. Water
quality was assessed as polluted. The major fish species were Cyprinus
carpio, Barbus barbus (sic - possibly B. capito),
Alburnus spp., Cobitis taenia, Gambusia affinis,
and Carassius carassius (sic - presumably C. auratus).
A fish kill noted by Coad (1980c) in 1978 was attributed by local
informants to careless insecticide spraying on fields neighbouring the
Gorgan. Newspaper and radio reports variously stated that 200 barrels
of a highly toxic chemical spilled into the river when a truck
overturned and that the chemical, identified as Turbidan from the
Trintext chemical plant, was dumped by a technician commissioned to
get rid of the waste product (Kayhan International, 7 May 1978).
The Atrak headwaters are close to those of the Tedzhen basin. The
Atrak basin comprises about 40,000 sq km. The Atrak is only about
10-15 m wide and about 0.5 m deep over much of its lower course. It
only reaches the Caspian Sea during floods. A tributary of the Atrak
from Turkmenistan is the saline Sambar River, about 203 km long. Petr
(1987) reports that efforts were being made to divert this river so as
to increase the water quality in the Atrak. The fresh section of the
Atrak has a conductivity of 2362 µS and the saline section 23,500
µS. The Caspian Sea off the Atrak River is an important fishery
economic zone. Gasan-kuli or Hasan Kuli is a town in Turkmenistan near
the Iranian border referred to in fishery reports from this area. The
catch of Rutilus rutilus, Cyprinus carpio and Sander
marinum was nearly 1.44 x 104 tonnes with only 1.9%
being accounted for by Clupeonella cultriventris. However by
1972 the catch of the commercially important species had declined to
1.5% and the less desirable Clupeonella had increased to 5.73 x
104 t or 98.3% of the catch. The causes were reduction
in the Atrak runoff through irrigation withdrawals, pollution from
agriculture, overfishing in the sea and the drop in sea level. Flows of the
Atrak did not reach the sea in 1984, 1986, 1990 and 1991and spawning of species
using the lower reaches did not occur (Caspian Environmental Programme, 2000).
There are 5 lakes along the Atrak, fed by the river, which have
been recently dyked to improve water retention. Their fauna is
dominated by native cyprinids. The lowest lake is saline and they
range in size from 400 to 2500 ha.
The lakes Alagol or Ala-Gol at 37°21-22'N, 54°35'E,
Ulmogol, Alma-Gol or Ulmagol 37°24-25'N, 54°38-39'E
and Ajigol or Adji-Gol at 37°24-25'N, 54°40'E
comprise a Ramsar Site (World Conservation Monitoring Centre, 1990;
Scott, 1995) near the frontier with Turkmenistan just east of the
Caspian Sea. Alagol occupies 1400 ha (Scott (1995) states 900 ha) and
both Ulmogol and Ajigol 200 ha (Scott (1995) states 280 ha and 360 ha
respectively). The Alagol Lake is slightly saline with a mud and sand
bottom. It is fed by springs, seepage and precipitation and may dry
out completely in summer. It overflows westwards when full. Vegetation
is sparse with Juncus, Carex and grasses mainly in the
northeast and small patches of Phragmites communis. It is
oligotrophic and vegetation poor. The other two lakes have seasonal
fresh water fed by precipitation and have a mud and clay bottom. They
are eutrophic and water levels vary greatly so that they may dry up
completely. Ulmogol has little vegetation such as Juncus, the
duckweed Lemna, Phragmites communis, Alhagi and
algae while Ajigol has extensive Phragmites reedbeds at its
eastern end and abundant submerged vegetation. Fishing occurs in the
lakes and the habitats are affected by cattle grazing and reed
cutting. Water is abstracted for irrigation and for a fish hatchery. In Alma-Gol
and Ala-Gol, 90.91% and 82.18% of the total frequency of fishes was comprised of
exotic species. Hemiculter leucisculus was the most frequent in Alma-Gol
(58%) and Adji-Gol (16.82%) and Carassius auratus in Ala-Gol (77.6%).
Other exotics were Gambusia holbrooki, Pseudorasbora parva
and Cyprinus carpio (Patimar and Kiabi, 2005).
The Qareh Su (= Gharesoo) is another river entering the Gorgan Mordab. In its upper
reaches it has a rocky bed and a fauna of Nemacheilus malapterurus,
Capoeta capoeta and Alburnoides bipunctatus, resembling the grayling
zone of Europe. The central part of the river dries up (the barbel zone) while
the lower river (bream zone) is brackish from gulf input, has high temperatures
and pollution. This lower zone has Carassius auratus, Alburnus
alburnus, Cyprinus carpio, Pseudorasbora parva, Gambusia
holbrooki and Gasterosteus aculeatus with Atherina boyeri,
Neogobius kessleri, Neogobius melanostomus, Neogobius fluviatilis,
Knipowitschia caucasica, and Liza saliens feeding in the estuary,
and Acipenser stellatus, Alburnus chalcoides, Cyprinus
carpio, Rutilius rutilus and Vimba vimba migrating into the
river for reproduction.
Incheh Borun Lake at 37°13'N, 54°30'E is a small and isolated freshwater body of 50 ha about 40 km north of
Gorgan. Lake Bibishervan at 37°09'N, 54°52'E and Lake Eymar at 37°08'N, 54°52'E
are two more small isolated freshwater lakes occupying 300 ha and 250
ha respectively. All three lakes lie on a cultivated plain. The fish
faunas of these lakes are unknown.
The Golestan National Park lies between Bojnurd and Gonbad-e Qabus
and is divided by the Tehran-Mashhad highway. The Iran Nature and
Wildlife Magazine (volume 3, 1999; downloaded from its English
website) states that fish in the Doogh River include rainbow trout and
Umbra krameri (sic), both exotics. The latter species is
an error of translation from Farsi to English of common names (B. Kiabi, pers. comm., 23 February 2000).
A description of the park is given by Kiabi et al. (1994).
The Anzali (= Enzeli or Pahlavi) Mordab (37°26'N, 49°25'E) is a freshwater to brackish
lagoon (Firouz, 1968b) separated from the Caspian Sea by a sandy
barrier about 1 km wide. The more modern term is "talab" (= pool or
marsh, which lacks the association with death) but the older literature refers
to mordab and the term is still in common use. It is surrounded by ab-bandans such as the
Selke Ab-bandan of 360 ha at 37°24'N, 49°29'E
which is protected as a Wildlife Refuge. Ab-bandans are a feature of
the Caspian coastal plain, being a shallow and artificial freshwater
impoundment managed in winter for duck hunting and in summer as an
irrigation reservoir. The Anzali Mordab complex of 15,000 ha is a Ramsar Site and this includes the whole mordab, the Siah-Kesheem
marshes, Selke Ab-bandan and several other ab-bandans. The main mordab
comprising open water is 26 km long and 2.0-3.5 km wide encompassing
about 11,000 ha. Reed beds extend the eastern limit by a further 7 km.
The Siah-Kesheem (or Siah-Keshim) Protected Region has a lagoonal
surface area of 4500 ha (Khara, 1994; 6700 ha in Scott, 1995) and is
about 12 km long by 4.5 km wide. It lies to the southwest of the main
mordab, of which is was probably once part, and is fed by the Esfand
River. Note that Khan et al. (1992) state that the Anzali
Mordab is unprotected except for the Siah-Kesheem Protected Region and
the Selke Ab-bandan of 360 ha. A description of the Siah-Keshim
Protected Area is given by Riazi (1996) and of the wetland generally
by Monawari (1990). Important fishes are listed as Sander
lucioperca, Cyprinus carpio, Silurus glanis and Esox
lucius (Iran Nature and Wildlife Magazine, 5, www.neda.net/inwm/no.5/english/pre_sites/pre_sites01.html,
downloaded 8 March 2000).
The main mordab is drained by the Sowsar Roga, Pir Bazar Roga,
"Raste-Khaleh" (? Rasteh Kenar) Roga, Nahang Roga and
Pahlavi or "Koulivar" (? Kolver) Roga over a distance of
about 4 km to the Caspian Sea. Warm, dense and saline sea water is
able to penetrate up these effluent rivers for as much as 10 km, which generally have low
flow because of water abstraction and seasonally low precipitation,
because of the rise in sea level since 1977. Fresh water flows across
the surface of the saline water mixing at depths of 0.5-2.0 m. Salt
water contamination is always a danger as more water is abstracted in
this heavily populated and farmed area (Kimball, 1973; Kimball and Shayegan, 1973;
Sharifi, 2006). Abdolmaleki (1994) gives some data on the benthic
macrofauna of this lagoon. Hosseinpour (1995) surveys the zoobenthic
resources of the Siahdarvishan and Pasikhan, two principal rivers
which enter the lagoon. Other entering rivers are the "Bohambar, Chakoor and Esfand".
Forest clearance around the mordab, rice production and other
agriculture, dams and weirs on inflowing rivers, river bed erosion
through decline in Caspian Sea level, influx of pesticides such as Diazinon (Talebi,
1998), Paraquat, Glyphosite, and chemical fertilisers, domestic and
agricultural sewage, excessive aquatic plant growth and natural decay
of vegetation (Nezami and Khodaparast, 1996; Filizadeh and Khodaparast, 2005),
phytoplankton blooms, some toxic (Nejatkhah et al., 2003) anionic
surfactants (Dadaye Ghandi et al., 2005), siltation from
deforestation of feeder streams, introduction of exotic species of
fish and plants such as Azolla (Iran Daily, 2 November 2006), grazing for livestock, reed
cutting for mats, fences and building materials, and a high urban
population growth of 4.6% per year, all affect the habitat and the
marsh is highly eutrophic. These factors also contribute to the fall
in commercial fishing success. In the 1930s the catch was dominated by
the valuable Rutilus frisii kutum but in the 1990s the catch
was 50-75 times lower and the mordab now has a low value to fisheries.
The situation is compounded by the absence of effective fishery
management. The introduced Carassius auratus dominates catches.
The mordab was a principal breeding ground for Rutilus frisii kutum,
Abramis brama and Cyprinus carpio, and to a lesser
extent Sander lucioperca, and was an important habitat for Esox
lucius. Fish kills occur, more than 100,000 dying in August 1997
due to a lack of oxygen after "torrential rain and the growth of
aquatic herbs had created an unsuitable environment" (a Reuters
report) and more fish died in 2005 (Iran Daily, 21 August 2005).
The bottom of the shallow west basin was completely covered by
perennial submerged vegetation in the early 1970s (Chara, Nitella,
Ceratophyllum, Myriophyllum, Hydrilla, and Vallisneria).
Water chestnut (Trapa natans) was the predominant floating
plant and covered the central basin in 1966. The Caspian lotus, Nelumbium
caspium is found all across the lagoon and is a significant part
of the standing stock. Phragmites, Sparganium and Typha
are emergent plants which engulfed open water. Reeds were formerly cut
extensively for building purposes but are now replaced by sheet metal
and cement blocks. Falling Caspian Sea water level and eutrophication
from domestic sewage and fertilizers aided plant growth. The fern, Azolla
filiculoides, was introduced as an additive to cattle feed and
rice cultivation from the Philippines in 1986. It soon entered the
mordab from the rice fields and mats up to 20 cm thick covered much of
the open water in 1991 (Holčík
and Oláh, 1992). Dense growths of macrophytes have contributed to
declines in commercial fish catches as spawning grounds have
decreased, eutrophication is enhanced, and light penetration is
decreased and so oxygen declines. There are about 200 sq km of marshes
and 30 sq km of shallow open water fed by rivers from the Alborz
Mountains. The area of open water in 1989 was only 22.5% of that in
the late 1930s (Holčík
and Oláh, 1992). However the rise in Caspian Sea level since 1978 has
led to a salt water intrusion during the summer months when the
Caspian level is at its highest and freshwater input from rivers is at
its lowest. Deeper and more saline water may well inhibit plant growth
in the future (Khan et al., 1992).
The marsh is only a few metres higher than the Caspian Sea and had
a maximum depth of 2.5 m in the early 1970s. Caspian Sea level
fluctuations have serious effects on the level of the mordab and hence
its utility as a habitat for fishes. The optimum level for the fish
industry in general in the Caspian basin is given as -27±1 m (Mandych,
1995). The rise in Caspian Sea level since 1977 is gradually returning
the mordab to its supposed, natural brackish state and may improve the
fisheries situation which had declined over the last 50 years.
Emergent and submergent aquatic macrophytes were decreasing and such
fish as Atherina boyeri, Alosa caspia, Liza aurata, Syngnathus
abaster and Clupeonella cultriventris were increasing in
numbers since 1989. However the fishery will require extensive
engineering and management innovations to recover.
Hydrorybproject (1965), Kimball (1973), Kimball and Shayegan
(1973), Kimball and Kimball (1974), Hagh-Panah (1992), Holčík
and Oláh (1992) and Caspian Environmental Programme (2001c) give details of the limnology of the marsh. Water
temperatures vary seasonally from 0° to
28.8°C (average about 16ºC) and dissolved oxygen from 0 to
17.5 mg/l for example. Phytoplankton blooms have killed fish in the mordab, e.g. on 5 June 1997 when dissolved oxygen in the western part
was at 0-0.2 mg/l and hydrogen sulphide was at 2.0-2.5 mg/l (Iranian
Fisheries Research and Training Organization Newsletter, 17:7,
1997).. Conversely, low phytoplankton populations have probably
resulted in lowered fish catches. High water temperatures and
chlorophyll inactivation through high light levels reduce the numbers
of phytoplankton and hence zooplankton, on which fish feed, also
decline. Higgins (1973) found that DDT levels in sturgeon, sturgeon
caviar, Cyprinus carpio and Rutilus frisii taken near
Anzali were not hazardous to humans in flesh (0.2-1.8 p.p.m.) or in
caviar (0.05 to 2.5 p.p.m.), both less than the limit for edible
fishes set by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration at 5 p.p.m., but
that the level in the caviar was a serious threat to sturgeon
reproduction. DDT was more concentrated in the eggs because of their
fats and oils in which DDT is more soluble. Certain heavy metals, lead
and silver, were potentially harmful to the fishes also. Pourang (1995, 1996), Amini Ranjbar (1998), CEP (2001a)
and Sartaj et al. (2005) describe heavy metal concentrations (lead,
chromium, copper, cadmium, zinc, manganese and nickel) in fish, surficial sediments and various macroinvertebrates of
the Anzali wetland. Levels in Carassius auratus and Esox lucius
were below recommended levels for human consumption. Carassius
auratus, Cyprinus carpio, Esox lucius and Hypophthalmichthys
molitrix in the Anzali Mordab have zinc (5.39-27.98, mean 17.28
p.p.m.), cadmium (0-0.08, mean 0.0251 p.p.m.), cobalt (0-1.67, mean
0.6935 p.p.m.), lead (0.11-2.95, mean 1.04 p.p.m.) and mercury
(0.113-0.63, mean 0.3 p.p.m.) in their muscle tissues (Annual
Report, 1995-1996, Iranian Fisheries Research and Training
Organization, Tehran, p. 46-47, 1997). Nadim (1977) found the highest
mercury levels in Caspian Sea fish were 0.51 and 0.36 mg/kg in Rutilus frisii
and Esox lucius respectively with the lowest in Liza aurata at
0.07 mg/kg. As the acceptable limit was 0.5 mg/kg, mercury contamination in fish
was not considered a problem. The lowest zinc
concentration was in H. molitrix, the highest lead
concentration was in C. carpio and the highest cobalt
concentration in C. auratus but concentrations were less than
those set by WHO as significant. Södergren et al. (1978)
reported on pollution with organochlorines in Esox lucius from
the mordab and found this predatory fish to have accumulated the DDT
metabolite p,p'-DDE, suggesting that this occurred
over considerable time and was not a recent event. DDT did not appear
to be incorporated in the pelagic food chain, although it has been
used for agriculture and vector control problems. Most DDT probably
attaches to clay and soil particles and settles out on the mordab
bottom. These authors also recorded DDT from sturgeon species and
their eggs in Iranian waters. Pollution continues to be a problem in
this heavily populated, industrial and farming region. Heavy rains in
October 1995 swept industrial wastes including heavy metals such as
lead and zinc, agricultural waste and domestic sewage into the mordab.
A fish kill resulted as evidenced by the mordab being covered with
floating dead fish. The kill was attributed to the heavy metals and to
oxygen depletion (http://netiran.com:80/news/IRNA/html/941029IRGG01.html).
Amini Rad (2001) assesses the socio-economic importance of fisheries in
Bandar Anzali. Fishes are very popular food items there with an average
consumption of 11.3 kg, 70% more than in the rest of Iran. White fish (safid
mahi, Rutilus frisii) was 1.5 times more expensive than mullets (Mugilidae),
2.6 more than other species and almost 28 times kilka.
Gorgan (= Asterabad or Astrabad) Bay (36°40'N, 53°50'E) is 56 km long by 16 km long and
is brackish (8.7-10.0‰) because of input from rivers although Bayrami et al.
(20030 give 16 p.p.t. The bay encompasses about 400 sq km. A
general description is given by Zanusi (1995) who considers it to be
the second richest resource for caviar in the Caspian Sea after the
Volga River. The Caspian Environmental Programme (2001c) gives an average
surface water temperature of 19.1ºC, oxygen from
2.4 to 11.1 mg/l, pH 8.0-8.5 and total dissolved solids 11.23 mg/l in February
to 15,052 mg/l in March. The bay's ecology has been changed by the recent rise in sea
level which resulted in storm surges over the sand bar between it and
the Caspian Sea. The construction of the Voshmgir Dam on the Gorgan
River in 1970 also had an effect, reducing the amount of fresh water
to the river mouth which provided spawning areas for Cyprinus
carpio and Rutilus rutilus. Over 40% of the total sturgeon fishing in the Caspian
Sea is centred on Bandar-e Torkeman. There is also a black market in
sturgeon products. Authorised fishing resources shrunk by 33% from
1993-1994 to 1994-1995 through unauthorised fishing, lack of controls
and decrease in controlled sturgeon reproduction. The authorised catch
in 1994 for the region from the Neka River to the Turkmenistan border
was 1500 tonnes and the unauthorised catch was probably of similar
size. The caviar production was 57,000 kg.
The bay once had a valuable Rutilus rutilus fishery with an annual catch of
4000 t per year about 20-30 years ago but this has disappeared (Petr,
1987). The bay is now dominated by Mugilidae (CEP, 1998). The catch in the Voshmgir reservoir was 60 t in 1986 although
it may improve with stocking programmes. Lalouie (1993) surveyed the
hydrobiology of the bay and found an average pH of 8.3, similar to the
sea proper as were alkalinity and total hardness. Water temperatures ranged from 5°C to 30°C
annually. Pollution from urban and industrial sewage and pesticides is present.
Gorgan Bay is believed to be an important nursery ground for Liza
aurata, a major food fish, although an exotic. Cage and pen culture
operations in the bay may result in escapes of exotics that could affect native
species. On three separate occasions, cages capsized in storms releasing
millions of Oncorhynchus mykiss fingerlings (www.ramsar.org/ram_rpt_37e/htm,
downloaded 4 May 2001).
The area of the Miankaleh Peninsula, Gorgan Bay and the nearby
freshwater Lapoo-Zaghmarz Ab-bandans is designated as a Ramsar Site
(World Conservation Monitoring Centre, 1990). The Miankaleh Wildlife
Refuge encompasses 81,180 ha and is part of the Miankaleh Protected
Region (97,200 ha). Jones (www.ramsar.org/lib_dir_2_3.htm downloaded
14 April 2000) gives 68,800 ha for the Wildlife Refuge. The Miankaleh
wetland may encompass 40,000 ha, not the larger figures as originally
designated (Khan et al., 1992). The bay has a sand and mud
bottom and is oligotrophic. There are extensive marshes along the
southern and eastern shores which flood in fall and winter. These
marshes are eutrophic from agricultural runoff and stream and
irrigation channel inputs. The bay vegetation comprises principally
glasswort (Salicornia), sedges (Carex) and rushes (Juncus)
with some small reedbeds of Phragmites communis. The ab-bandans
have extensive reedbeds of Phragmites communis with stands of
reedmace (Typha) and abundant submerged vegetation. Several
factors will affect the ichthyofauna including irrigation requirements
limiting freshwater flow into the bay and ab-bandans, a fish
processing plant at Ashuradeh with associated wastes, a new road along
the peninsula which facilitates access and potentially increased
pollution and poaching, reed cutting, heavy livestock grazing,
agricultural wastes, aquaculture ponds using exotics, fishing by local people and a proposed nuclear
power plant. The whole area is an important nursery and breeding
ground for fishes. The ab-bandans are not protected although they are
within the Ramsar Site. The two shallow ab-bandans occupy 950 ha at 36°50'N, 53°17'E northwest of Behshahr. They are
fed by irrigation ditches and drain east into Gorgan Bay.
The Gomishan Marshes at 37°15'N, 53°55'E
extends along the eastern shore of the Caspian Sea from Gomishan north
and northwest to the Turkmenistan border. There are about 4850 ha of
brackish lagoons and marshes, their brackish nature occasioned by the
rise in Caspian Sea level. There is agriculture, livestock grazing and
waterfowl hunting. The fish fauna is mostly unknown but the area is probably and
important breeding ground for the commercially important mullet Liza aurata
(www.ramsar.org/ram_rpt_37e.htm, downloaded 4 May 2001), for Rutilus rutilus and for Sander
lucioperca, and the latter two are open to hydrocarbon pollution (Ghasempouri
and Esmaili Sari, 2002).
The Astara lagoon at the western end of the Caspian coast of Iran is separated from the Caspian Sea by a sand bar,
and is flooded across this bar during winter storms. The lagoon
encompasses about 950 ha and is fed by a river during August to March,
reducing its salinity to about 7 p.p.m. There is a rich growth of
aquatic plants and the area has potential for fishing and aquaculture
(Petr, 1987). Lavandavil Marsh at 38°20'N, 48°50'E is found about 10 km south of
Astara and lies within a Protected Area of 949 ha. It is a small
swampy woodland and freshwater marsh with extensive stands of Juncus.
Abbasabad Dam at 38°23'N, 48°50'E south of Astara is a 45 ha water storage reservoir. Nur or Neur Gol at
38°00'N, 48°33'E in the northwest Alborz Mountains is a 200 ha freshwater lake at 2300
m about 50 km south of Astara. It lies within the Lisar Protected Area
which includes the whole watershed of the Lisar River. The lake drains
north to an Aras River tributary but freezes over for about 6 months
each year. The submergent vegetation is rich. Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus
mykiss - see account of this species) were introduced to the lake
in the early 1970s in an attempt to start a sport fishery.
There is also a number of permanent and seasonal lakes along the Sabalan
Mountain range which lies partly in this basin and partly in the Lake Orumiyeh
basin and these are known to have fishes (www.netiran.com,
downloaded 17 June 2004).
The "Lapu" Lake, about 20 km northeast of Sari in Mazandaran, is an example of a smaller water body along the Caspian
shore, covering about 100 ha with a maximum depth of about 2.5 m,
perhaps 3.5 m in winter (Petr, 1987). There is a rich assortment of
aquatic plants. In 1985, 90,000 fingerlings of common carp or kopur (Cyprinus
carpio), grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella) and silver
carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix) were stocked and 120,000
fingerlings were added in 1986. A good harvest was reported in 1986.
There is a wide variety of reservoirs on the Caspian shore, varying in
size from about 10 to 400 ha. Some completely dry out in summer when
water demands are high but others are stocked with common carp, silver
carp and, to a lesser degree, grass carp. There are also populations
of native fishes such as kopur Cyprinus carpio and ordak mahi (Esox
lucius) but not in commercial quantities.
The "Amirkelayeh" Lake or Lagoon is located between the
cities of Lahijan, Langarud and Kiashahr at 37°17'N,
50°12'E. It is an example of a larger, freshwater lagoon as it
encompasses 1230 ha, being 4.5 km long and up to 1.7 km wide. The lake
is in the Amirkelayeh Wildlife Refuge and is a Ramsar Site (World
Conservation Monitoring Centre, 1990). Average depth is only 1.6 m
although some areas reach 4 m (Scott (1995) states 3-4 m on average
but up to 6 m). The lake is fed by springs and precipitation and is
eutrophic. It lies above the 1980s rise in water level of the Caspian
Sea (Khan et al., 1992). It may flood into marshes or the
Caspian Sea via a small stream into a channel of the Safid River but
is above the recent (1990s) rise in Caspian Sea level. Vegetation is Phragmites
communis and Typha with abundant submerged and floating
plants such as Nelumbium, Lemna, Potamogeton, Hydrilla,
Myriophyllum and Ceratophyllum. The fishes comprise Esox
lucius, Sander lucioperca, Carassius sp. (listed as
Crucian carp, probably C. auratus), Blicca bjoerkna, Syngnathus
abaster, Pungitius platygaster, Silurus glanis, Rutilus
rutilus, Cyprinus carpio, and Tinca tinca. Ctenopharyngodon
idella has been introduced (Nejatsanatee, 1994).
The Fereidookenar or Fereydun Kenar Marshes at 36°35'N, 52°31'E lie 13 km southwest of Babolsar
and occupy 1000 ha. These marshes are artificial, being a damgah or
shallow impoundment for duck hunting and water storage. They are one
of the best protected wetlands along the Caspian shore as the local
duck hunters aggressively restrict access (Khan et al., 1992).
There are fringing reed beds of Phragmites australis and Typha
with abundant floating and submerged vegetation.
"Seyed Mohalli, Zarin Kola (both at 36°44'N,
53°00'E) and Larim Sara (36°45'N, 53°03'E)" are ab-bandans and associated
marshy areas found north of Sari and east of the Tajan
River mouth. The first two occupy 600 ha and the last one 1000 ha.
Aquatic vegetation is rich, both submerged and floating, and there are
extensive stands of Typha and Phragmites. Construction
of a large dam on the Tajan will result in an associated network of
irrigation canals which may cause ab-bandans to be neglected. The
ab-bandans, although artificial, have more of the character of a
natural marsh than irrigation channels. Much of this area of the
coastal plain has been converted to agriculture which destroys natural
wetlands so ab-bandans take on a disproportionate importance as a
refuge for wildlife including fishes.
Various dams have been built or are under construction in this
basin including the Gourchye Embankment Dam 15 km southeast of Ardebil
with a capacity of 20 million cu m, the Yamchi Dam 20 km southwest of
Ardebil and the Gaybeglou Dam 40 km south of Meshgin Shahr in East
Azarbayjan Province, the Maku Dam with a 150 million cu m capacity in
West Azarbayjan and the Agh Chay or Ziaeddin Dam near Khvoy (http://netiran.com/news/IRNA/html/950914IRGG06.html;
http://netiran.com/news/IRNA/html/950914IRGG10.html;
http://netiran.com/news/IranNews/html/96102201INEC.html).
The Neka Power Plant in the eastern Caspian basin entrains a large
amount of debris and algae that prevent effective physical systems of fish protection from entrainment. An electrical
fish protection system is used instead. Inflatable rubber dams are now being
constructed in the lower reaches of rivers, e.g. the Babol, to block the rise in
Caspian Sea level such that agricultural water intakes will not be contaminated
with saline water. The effects of these dams on fish migrations and biology is
unknown (www.satujo.com/english/barrage/dams4.htm, downloaded 20 December 2002).
Qanats and springs are not a feature of this basin as in so many
other parts of Iran, except for the drier areas drained by the Qezel
Owzan and other streams of the plateau and in the drier valleys of the
east away from the rainfall of the Alborz-backed Caspian lowlands. One
particular artificial habitat for fishes in the lowlands are the
ab-bandans, shallow freshwater marshes maintained as habitat and
overwintering areas for waterfowl and for conserving water for rice
fields (Beaumont and Neville, 1968). Some ab-bandans around the Anzali
Mordab were set aside as refuges for waterfowl and incidentally would
protect some fish species threatened by the draining of marshes.
Construction of irrigation dams will also lead to abandonment of
ab-bandans. Ab-bandans and damgah (ponds made specifically for duck
trapping) have declined in number but still encompass 10,000 ha (Scott, 1995).
Extensive stocking of commercially important species in the
sturgeon (Acipenseridae) and carp (Cyprindiae) families takes place annually in
the Caspian waters of Iran. These are detailed under the species accounts.
Varedi and Fazli (2005) examined the rivers Shirud, Tonekabon, Larim, Tajan and
Goharbara of Mazandaran for the physico-chemical properties of estuarine water
in 2000-2001. Only the Shirud and Tonekabon met U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency standards for release of fingerlings, the other rivers failing because of
water abstraction and improper land use development.
Introduced species based on a summary by Mamaev (2002) include Liza
aurata and L. saliens (Mugilidae), Platichthys flesus (Pleuronectidae,
apparently not surviving), Psetta maxima maeotica (Scophthalmidae, as
Rhombus maeoticus in TACIS (2002) and probably not surviving), Scomber scombrus (Scombridae, not
often recorded elsewhere in the literature (an example is TACIS (2002), probably not surviving), Engraulis encrasicholus
(Engraulidae, probably not surviving), Anguilla anguilla (Anguillidae), Gambusia
affinis (Poeciliidae), Oncorhynchus keta , O. kisutch, O.
gorbuscha and Salmo salar (Salmonidae), and Ctenopharyngodon idella,
Hypophthalmichthys molitrix, H. nobilis (Cyprinidae).
Zoogeographically, Berg (1940) considers this part of Iran to
belong to the Kura-Iranian sector of the Caspian District of the Ponto-Caspian-Aral
Province. This fauna is very similar to that of the Kura River
although certain genera are absent, even in the Safid - a major river,
such as Chondrostoma, Gobio and Leucalburnus.
Dasht-e Kavir
This basin occupies an immense area of north-central Iran, over
200,000 sq km in the rain shadow of the Alborz Mountains. Mahdavi and
Anderson (1983) detailed the qanat water supply of the margins of this
basin. Intermittent streams drain to several kavirs which are grouped
together under this basin for convenience. The principal kavirs are
the Damghan Kavir in the north, the Sabzevar Kavir in the north-east
and the Kavir-e Bozorg (or Great Kavir) occupying much of the basin,
being about 450 km in east-west extent and 250 km in north-south
extent. The Kavir-e Bozorg receives waters exiting from other kavirs.
The principal streams entering this basin drain the Alborz Mountains
and their eastern extensions in Khorasan. The Alborz peaks exceed 4000
m and even to the east the Kuh-e Binalud (36°30'N,
58°55'E) attains 3416 m near Neyshabur (36°12'N, 58°50'E)
while the lowest points are at an altitude of 650 m. The Damghan Kavir
receives two major streams from the Alborz, the Damghan River and the
Hasanabad River, and other streams dry up in early summer. The
Sabzevar Kavir has numerous small and temporary streams which feed it
as well as two major streams, the Mureh River, 320 km long, and its
tributary, the Kalshur River, 240 km long. The Kalshur drains the Kuh-e
Binalud and flows west to meet the south flowing Mureh. These rivers
drain areas rich in salt domes and samples taken show water to be
saline and some streams are fishless. Qanats support fishes in this
area although the fish only emerge at night in some cases.
Ruttner-Kolisko (1964; 1966) and Ruttner and Ruttner-Kolisko (1972;
1973) studied the chemistry and limnology of natural springs and
qanats in a mountain area separating this basin from the Bejestan
basin. Several factors were found to affect the limnology. Climatic
factors were temperature, precipitation and evaporation, edaphic
factors were geology, salt content of soil and intensity of waterflow,
and pollution by man and animals was a factor. There was a range in
salinity from low (<15 mval/l) to high (>120 mval/l). Qanat
discharges in this area were 20-50 l/sec. Springs were small and many
were dammed to form small pools for livestock.
These large central basins of Iran were once thought to be
desiccating lake basins. However more recent studies have shown that
although there may have been shallow lakes, e.g. saline Lake Damghan,
and rivers carried more flow and were perhaps more closely linked than
today, there was no extensive and continuous freshwater lake over the
whole of central Iran that could have facilitated fish dispersal.
While the hills received increased rainfall, the central deserts
remained arid during Pleistocene "pluvials" and cold phases
(Bobek, 1959; Scharlau, 1968; Krinsley, 1970).
Dasht-e Lut
The Lut basin of south-central Iran is ringed by mountains yet has
the lowest point on the plateau at 205 m in the Namakzar-e Shahdad.
The central portions of this basin are some of the most barren and
inhospitable in Iran or indeed the world. Conrad and Conrad (1970) and
Gabriel (1938) give descriptions of this desert basin. Intermittent
streams drain the mountain ranges around Kerman east to the namakzar
or namaksar (= salt waste), north from mountains near Bam (29°06'N,
58°21'E) such as the Kuh-e Jebal Barez (28°30'N, 58°20'E)
and Kuh-e Bazman (28°04'N, 60°01'E)
which delimit the northern edge of the Jaz Murian basin, west from the
slopes of the active volcano Kuh-e Taftan (28°36'N,
61°06'E) and south from the mountain ranges near Birjand (32°53'N, 58°13'E).
High points include the Kuh-e Hazaran west of Bam and south of Kerman
at 4402 m. Such heights retain snow and have more abundant
precipitation which feed streams at least in the mountains. However
many minor and some apparently major streams marked on maps are
completely dry. Much of the water is absorbed into the ground and
tapped by qanats. The Shah River at Birjand is dry through most of the
year (Fisher, 1968). Tabas (33°36'N, 56°54'E)
at the northern end of this basin has numerous qanats (Krinsley, 1970)
but I have not seen samples from this area.
The Tahrud is an important stream which drains the Hazaran to a
small sump in the south of the Lut basin and has a continuous flow
which becomes subsurface well east of Bam (compare maps). Its maximum
map extent approaches 250 km. In the mountains, the Tahrud is 1-8 m
wide and up to 50 cm deep. Water temperature was a warm, 15°C on a cool December day.
The Lut includes the largest sand dune field in Iran (ca. 10,000 sq
km) which has developed through aeolian erosion. Sand dunes block
roads and may well fill in or divert streams.
Qanats in this basin can have water temperatures much higher than
the few surface streams. One qanat near Bam had a temperature of 25°C
in a snowstorm, yet stream temperatures below 10°C
are not uncommon.
Esfahan
The principal feature of this basin is the Zayandeh River which
rises in the Zagros Mountains east of Zard Kuh at 4548 m (32°22'N,
50°04'E) and flows east for about 300 km to its terminal basin, the Batlaq-e Gavkhuni at 32°20'N,
52°47'E, a salt marsh with a salinity of 315‰ (Löffler, 1961) and an average depth of about 1 m
(www.netiran.com/php/artp.php?id=1615, downloaded 19 July 2004).
The salt marsh can dry up in summer. Wetlands
associated with the terminal basin are a Ramsar Site of 43,000 ha (or 37,000 ha;
sources vary as does the size of the marsh seasonally and annually).
Associated marshes at the river delta and along its banks are fresh to
brackish. These marshes are fed by flooding and by irrigation canals
but dry up in late spring or early summer. Flooded areas often freeze
over in winter. There is little natural marsh vegetation and flooding
occurs over degraded steppe and cultivated land. Water is diverted for
irrigation and for domestic and industrial uses. It receives
pollution from Esfahan and other urban sources. Esfahan is a major
oasis city on the Zayandeh at 32°40'N, 51°38'E
with a population over 1 million.
The Zayandeh basin encompasses about
30,480 sq km and is connected to the upper Karun River basin (which
drains to the Persian Gulf) by the Kuhrang Tunnel constructed in 1953
although first proposed in the early sixteenth century (Fitt, 1953;
Afifi, 1966; IRNA, 5 February 2002). Two additional tunnels are under
construction (Stoltz, 2002). A hydroelectric dam at Godar-e Langar (also known as
Karun-4) would also supply piped water to Esfahan 300 km away if it is
completed (Whitley and Gallagher, 1995). Dams have deleterious effects
on a riverine fish fauna and are often stocked with exotic species.
The upper Karun has not been well explored for endemic taxa. Mean
annual flow of the Zayandeh is estimated at 1.2-1.45 billion cu m,
used mostly for agriculture but an increase in population and industry
has necessitated dam construction (Shah Abbas Kabir or Sadd-e Zayandeh
Rud, capacity 1450 million cu m) and diversion schemes. There is also
the Hana Dam on the Hana River at Semirom with a height of 35 m and a
capacity of 45 million cu m (http://netiran.com/news/IRNA/html931003IRGG04.html)
and the Izadkhast dam to the southwest of the Batlaq-e Gavkhuni (www.irna.com/newshtm/eng/12003142.htm,
IRNA, 2 July 2000). As well as man-made diversions, the upper
Zayandeh basin has captured headwaters from systems tributary to the
Persian Gulf. The Shah Abbas dam has reduced the natural flood flows downstream
and little water now enters the salt desert.
Plans have been made to transfer Zayandeh River water from the
Band-e Cham-e Asseman to Yazd's Shahneh Reservoir by pipeline over a
distance of 375 km (Hamshahri, Tehran, 629:5, 22 February
1995). 78 million cu m of water will be transferred annually and this
will decrease the habitat for fishes in the Zayandeh River basin.
Spring flow is at least 1700 cu m per second, but this drops to 28
cu m per second in autumn (Oberlander, 1968b). Discharge peaks in
April with low values in September-October and decreases dramatically
downstream after abstraction, evaporation and infiltration (Beaumont,
1981). The Zayandeh can be forded on foot at Esfahan in summer and
Buckingham (1829) reported it to be dry. It dried again in 2000, 2001 and 2003 under drought
conditions, partly through water abstraction upstream for irrigation and partly
through aqueducts to other desert cities (Rafsanjan and Yazd) not in the Esfahan basin (Anonymous,
2001b; Foltz, 2002; newspaper reports). The river is polluted by city
sewage, local wastes dumped directly into the river, and industrial
wastes (Moghadam, 1976; Al-Hashimi, 1987; Tehran Times, 15
September 1997). 172,000 cu m of industrial pollutants enter the river
daily. Pollutants include phosphorus, nitrogen, lead, nickel, zinc,
organic substances, iron, manganese, oil products, mineral and organic
dyes and the sewage from villages with a population of 900,000 people.
Nadim (1977) found the highest mercury levels in fish were 0.19 mg/kg. As the
acceptable limit was 0.5 mg/kg, mercury contamination in fish was not considered
a problem. The flow is 1.45 billion cu m annually of which 1.1 billion cu m is
used for agriculture, 150 million cu m for industry and the remainder is used as drinking water.
The basin has a high demand for water supplies and has been under stress in this
regard for the last 50 years. It will be unable to meet water demands in less
than 15 years (Salemi and Heydari, 2006).
Ouseley (1819-1823) noted numerous small "bleak" and
caught several carp-like fish up to 12-14 inches long (ca. 30-36 cm)
in the deeper waters around the bridges over the Zayandeh at Esfahan.
The Batlaq-e Gavkhuni and marshes on the lower Zayandeh are a
Ramsar Site, the lake occupying 12,000 ha, permanent marsh 1000 ha and
temporary marsh 30,000 ha (World Conservation Monitoring Centre,
1990) or 47,000 ha (Mehrabi, 2004). It lies at 1470 m and has an average depth
of 1 m. The Batlaq (= salt lake or marsh, gavkhuni = cowshed because cattle are
put out to pasture in the marshes) is fishless but the marshes
have a freshwater character depending on the input from the Zayandeh
River. The substrate is silt and mud. Much of the marsh has been
converted for agriculture. Flooded areas may freeze over in winter. The salt
lake is said not to dry out completely (Mehrabi, 2004) although flows were down
to 10-100l/s in the dry years 2000-2002 and the lake was dried out (Esteky,
2006).
As with all plateau basins, this one also has springs and qanats
which contain fishes. Surber (1969) gives some data on total
alkalinity and calcium-magnesium hardness in this basin and
characterises it as moderately hard.
Fish farms have been developed in Esfahan Province (Tehran Times,
31 October 1999). Thirteen cold water and 10 warm water fish farms are
expected to yield 490 t of fish, rising to 18 cold water and 15 warm
water farms by the year 2000 with a yield of 760 t.
Hamun-e Jaz Murian
The Hamun (= marshy lake, in this instance) is dry for most of the
year, but fills with fresh water in winter (Harrison, 1941). Its
extent is presumably variable, depending on rainfall. It lies at an
altitude of about 300 m, with a still-subsiding depression within the
Jaz Murian plain, and is ringed by mountains.
The two major rivers flowing into the Hamun are the Halil (or
Haliri) River, known as the Kharan or Zar Dasht River in its upper
reaches, which flows from the neighbourhood of Kuh-e Laleh Zar at 4374
m lying to the northwest, and the Bampur River which flows towards the
Hamun from the east but follows a southerly course in its upper
reaches (Tipper, 1921). The source of the Bampur River lies between
1000 and 1500 m. The Halil is a longer river (ca. 390 km) than the Bampur (ca. 315 km) with a stronger and more continuous flow. There is
a 130 m high dam on the Halil, the Jiroft Dam, 40 km upriver of Jiroft. A flood
water storage dam at Bazman is 37 m high with a capacity of 3.3 million cu m
(www.irna.com, downloaded 26 January 2003). Discharge is only 1-3 m3/second in summer. Floods occur
(including an historical one which destroyed Jiroft in 1000 A.D., and
one in 1993) and river discharge can reach 800 m3/second in
15 hours with an 18 m rise in reservoir level in 40 hours and massive
sediment transport with turbidity reaching 280 gr/liter (sic) (www.stucky.ch/publication/JIRFLOOD.htm
downloaded 19 July 1999). The Bampur River in late November and early
December was flowing in its upper reaches near Karevandar and around
Iranshahr and Bampur but was dry between these two areas. Judging from
its width and depth below Bampur it probably did not reach the Hamun
by surface flow. Most rain at Iranshahr falls in January and February
(15 and 52 mm respectively) with none in the remaining months except
for rare summer monsoonal rains (Ganji, 1960). Irrigation and canal
schemes in the Bampur basin suffer from erosion and siltation problems
as elsewhere in Iran (Borowicka, 1958).
The Jaz Murian basin is ringed by much smaller streams draining the
surrounding mountains. These are all very small, e.g. the Ughin River
was as narrow as 30 cm and maximum depth in pools was about 50 cm when
sampled on 4 December 1977.
Hamun-e Mashkid
The Hamun-e Mashkid (= Mashkel) lies within Pakistan with its
western edge on the border with Iran. In this instance hamun means a
salt waste. The mountain ranges in this area of Iran are parallel with
the Iran-Pakistan border and run in a northwest-southeast direction.
The Mashkid River rises to the east of the mountains ringing the
Hamun-e Jaz Murian basin and flows east into Pakistan where it
receives a right bank tributary, the Rakhshan River, before turning
north to flow into the Hamun-e Mashkid. Its total length is ca. 430
km. Two tributaries of the Mashkid within Iran are the Rutak River and
the Simish (= Sunish River) which drain the lowlands between Kuh-e
Birag (27°35'N, 61°20'E) and the Badamo Range (27°38'N, 62°08'E)
from the northwest to enter the Mashkid River southeast of Saravan (27°22'N,
62°20'E). The upper Mashkid River is a
small mountain stream, probably with a perennial flow. The lower
reaches of this river, and of the Simish, comprise a series of muddy
pools of varying size. Some of these pools were isolated and fishless
in early December 1977, while larger ones, perhaps 1 km long,
contained some emaciated specimens. In this area fish are found more
abundantly in perennially flowing qanat streams.
The Tahlab River and its tributaries drain the eastern slopes of
the mountains south of Zahedan. The Tahlab flows in a southeasterly
direction into the Hamun over a ca. 160 km course. It was dry between
Zahedan and Mirjaveh (29°01'N, 61°28'E)
in early December 1977. The Ladiz River is a short (ca. 80 km) right
bank tributary of the Tahlab flowing from Kuh-e Taftan. In its lower
reach it was a small stream flowing in the bottom of a deep and wide
canyon. The stream banks were white with salt deposits.
Kor River
This basin occupies 26,440 sq km north and east of Shiraz at a
lowest altitude of ca. 1525 m. Its lowest part is occupied by a
chloride lake, the third largest lake in Iran, composed of two parts,
a northern basin known as Narges or Tashk and a southern basin known
as Neyriz = (Niriz) or Bakhtegan. The two basins are not always
connected and the southern basin is saltier because major freshwater
input is from the north. Löffler (1956; 1957; 1959; 1968; 1981) gives
details of this lake. The lake area varies between 1210 and 2400 sq
km, with a maximum depth of 1.1-1.7 m and a mean depth of 0.5 m.
Salinity is 13.7-101.6 gl-1 and temperatures range from 15°C
to 45°C in the shallows. The lake is reported to have dried out completely in 1871, 1933 and 1966
(Cornwallis, 1968a) and in 2000 (www.irna.com/newshtm/eng/05142727.htm,
IRNA, 26 July 2000). Löffler (1993) considers that this lake
may dry out permanently in the near future if abstraction of water
from the Kor River for irrigation continues to grow. The drought in 2003 reduced
Lake Bakhtegan to a series of puddles. Fluctuations in
lake levels affect the freshwater faunas of springs, including fishes,
which drain into the lake: high levels swamp the springs with water
too saline for fishes to survive. Low levels, however, allow streams to connect
and exchange faunas on the lake bed so they are not as isolated as they might appear.
Bobek (1963) suggests that there may have been an outflow from this
basin to the Gulf at the south-east corner of the lake which was cut
off at the end of the Pleistocene by alluvial fans. However Krinsley
(1970) maintains that any outlet was closed by the late Pliocene.
Major rivers are the Kor (= the classical Araxes) and its tributary
the Pulvar (or Sivan) (= the classical Medus) which rise in the Zagros
Mountains to the north and north-west and drain to the north-west
corner of Lake Tashk. These mountains are high enough (Kuh-e Dinar at
4432 m and 30°50'N, 51°35'E) to have a snow cover and thus there is a continuous flow throughout
the year. However in summer water does not reach the lake because of
the demands of irrigation. Drainage and irrigation canals run through
the basin on the plains at the north end of the lake. Several springs
feed marshes, notably the Lapu'i marshes, a wetland of 150 sq km to
the north-west of the Kor-Pulvar junction, the Zarqan marshes of 4 sq
km, an extension of the Lapu'i marsh (both now severely damaged by
construction of a drainage canal as part of the Dorudzan or Sadd-e Daryush-e
Kabir (dam) at 30°15'N, 52°20'E, a project on the Kor River), the "Gomun", "Gumoon",
"Gumoo" or "Sangare" marshes of 2 sq km at the
north-west corner of Lake Tashk and the Sahlabad marshes of 5 sq km on
the south-east coast of Lake Bakhtegan (Cornwallis, 1968a; 1968b). The
Band-e Amir or Kamjan Marshes at 29°40'N, 53°05'E are formed at the delta of the
Kor River and encompassed about 100 sq km but the Daryush-e Kabir Dam
severely restricts the water flow to these marshes. A dam on the Bolaghi Gorge
is proposed which would affect the flow of the Pulvar but is being opposed on
archaeological grounds (www.netiran.com, downloaded 4 October 2004).
The fish, Aphanius sophiae, is found in these marshes and
springs, but suffers predatory attacks in an unusual way. The greater
flamingo stirs up mud in its feeding and this releases H2S,
CO2, and CH4, suffocating the fish and making
them easy prey for herons.
The Neyriz Lakes and Kamjan Marshes are a Ramsar Site (World
Conservation Monitoring Centre, 1990; Khan et al., 1992)
although the Kamjan Marsh area may be deleted because of drought and
other factors such as rice, wheat and cotton growing and livestock
grazing. The "Cheghakhur" and "Gandoman" marshes
in Chahar Mahall and Bakhtiari Province will be substituted for the
Kamjan Marshes as a listed Ramsar Site (Khan et al., 1992). The
"Gumoon" marshes have been partially drained for irrigation
and for conversion into aquaculture ponds (Khan et al., 1992).
The Daryush-e Kabir Dam on the Kor River contains 990 million cu m
of water, is 24 km long and about 9.5 km wide. Its conductivity is 363
µS compared to Lake Bakhtegan at 105,900 µS and consequently it can
support a fish fauna. Band-e Amir on the Kor River is a diversion dam
over 1000 years old and also provides a small reservoir habitat for
fishes (Houtum-Schindler, 1891). At least three other dam sites have
been proposed in this basin (Tang "Boraghi" (= Tang-e Boraq),
"Tang Bulak" and "Ghaderabad" (= Qaderabad)).
Surber (1969) gives some spot data on pH, total alkalinity,
calcium-magnesium hardness, chlorides and free CO2 in this
area. Water is relatively hard. Concentrations of total dissolved
solids vary between 202 mg/l and 436 mg/l in the rivers compared to a
range of 333-6937 mg/l in the Gulf basin.
Kaftar Lake at 30°34'N, 52°47'E is at ca. 2300 m in the Zagros Mountains northeast of Shiraz. It
occupies 4700 ha (500 ha in Khan et al. (1992)) and is a
shallow, semi-permanent freshwater lake which can dry out completely
in summer and is frozen over in winter. The annual mean water temperature is
14.4°C, the mean maximum 23.5°C and the mean minimum about 2°C (B. Jalali,
pers. comm., 1999). Lake water has been proposed
for irrigation usage in the past and a recently proposed earthen dam
would reduce the lake area by half (Scott, 1995). It has a mixed ichthyofauna of
native species and exotics. The fishes recolonise from springs and the main
river entering the lake and are also stocked.
The Kor River basin also contains qanats. Some of these flank the
Pulvar River, for example, and serve to bring water to fields above
the incised river bed.
Pollution in this basin has been recorded by Merchant and Ronaghy
(1976) where industry discharges waste untreated into surface and
ground waters. Waste from a sugar mill killed 1 million fish in 1994
and a further 500,000 fish died in 1996 from industrial waste (http://www.iran-e-azad.org/english/noi/noi-83.html
or News on Iran, 83, 15 November 1996). A fish kill was
reported from the Pulvar River in 1978, polluted by wastes from a food
factory (Coad, 1980c). Peritore (1999) and Moussavi and Saber (1999) record the Kor River receiving organic
wastes from animal processing plants, ammonium and mercury from petrochemical
complexes and such heavy metals as cadmium, chromium and arsenic from
electronics manufacturers. Ebrahimi et al. (2008) report lead levels in
Cyprinus carpio and Capoeta spp. to be less than the maximum
allowable by the European Union but still of concern.
Channels started in 1981 to provide more agricultural land drain
through the Kamjan Marshes to Lake Tashk and the Kharameh Marshes to
Lake Bakhtegan. Much of the marsh habitat has been destroyed. The
"Gumoon" Marsh has been drained for agriculture and fish ponds.
Miller (1985) reports on deforestation in this part of Iran during
the fourth to second millennium B.C. Even marsh areas were probably
treed before demands for charcoal and construction materials
increased. The fish faunas must have adapted to increased insolation
and any species sensitive to higher marsh and stream temperatures
would become less common.
Lake Maharlu
The Maharlu basin is the valley of Shiraz (29°36'N, 52°32'E) and encompasses about 4100 sq
km. Lake Maharlu is at an altitude of about 1460 m, has an estimated
average area of 220 sq km, a maximum depth variously cited as 0.5 and
3 m, a salinity of 124‰ or 304.95 gl-1 and is fishless.
The lake dried out completely in 1967 (Cornwallis, 1968a). The lake is
fed by minor streams and springs around its margin. The stream flowing
through Shiraz is dry for much of the year or composed mostly of
polluted wastes. The basin also has a number of qanats. Stream
temperatures vary between 8°C in January to 32°C in June while qanats can be warm,
e.g. at Sarvestan (29°16'N, 53°13'E) in December a qanat was 25°C. Surber
(1969) gives some spot data on pH, total alkalinity, calcium-magnesium
hardness, chlorides and free CO2 in this area.
The basin is separated by only a small rise from the Mand River of
the Gulf basin, but is treated separately here because fish
collections have been focused on this valley as Shiraz is the major
city of southern Iran.
Major fresh to brackish springs and their associated marshes (Ab-e
Paravan (2.5 sq km), Barm-e Shur (1.5 sq km) and Soltanabad (7 sq km))
are concentrated at the northern end of the lake (Cornwallis, 1968a).
Larger springs have pools which are about 2 m deep and reed beds of Phragmites
and Typha, some of which are cut. Livestock grazing occurs.
Amphibious tanks were tested in Barm-e Shur, stirring up anoxic bottom
mud and leading to a fish kill.
Numerous small springs around the lake are isolated from one
another by the intervening hypersaline water. Lake levels fluctuate
markedly and allow streams to meet on the exposed salt flat when the
water level is low. At high levels, salty water invades the lower
springs and eliminates their fishes, which only recolonise when the
lake level falls again and connection is made with a stream from a
spring which was above the last rise in lake level. One spring had a
salinity of 34‰ at the source when the lake had risen to
"invade" the spring. Aphanius persicus were
concentrated close to the source but would attempt to evade capture by
swimming into the salt lake where salinity was 180‰. Their
excursions into water of this salinity was brief and fish paled
visibly while darting in and out. Another spring was replete with
tooth-carps at 144‰. Temperature on 8 June 1976 at one spring was 27°C
at the surface and 32°C on the bottom, at about 1 m depth.
Lake Orumiyeh
Lake Orumiyeh (= Reza'iyeh, Urmia, Urmi, Urumiyeh or Darya-e Shahi)
lies in north-west Iran and is the only Iranian lake large enough to
appear on general maps of the world. This lake is a Ramsar Site and
includes Orumiyeh National Park. Brackish marshes in the northeast,
northwest and southern shores probably support some fishes but the
lake itself is too salty.
Orumiyeh lies at about 1275-1300 m (accounts vary), is about 128-149 km long and 40-60
km wide. This thalassohaline lake has a surface area of 4750-6100 sq km, a volume of
29.4 cu km, a mean depth of 4.9-6.0 m, a maximum depth of 16 m, and a
temperature range of -1.3-27.5°C. Lake level can rise as much as 2 m in one season, as it did in the winter
of 1968-1969. It is a sodium chloride-sulphate system with a salinity up to 310.79 gl-1
(but mostly 217-235gl-1) and consequently is fishless (Abich, 1856;
von Seidlitz, 1858; Rodler, 1887; De Mecquenem, 1908; Plattner, 1955;
Vladykov, 1964; Kelts and Shahrabi, 1986; Ghaheri et al., 1999; www.neda.net/inwm/no.6/english/geology/geology01.html,
downloaded 10 July 2000; Van Stappen et al., 2001; Eimanifar and Mohebbi,
2007). Initially the lake was probably fresh
(Admiralty Naval Staff, 1918). A causeway has divided the lake into
two parts since 1989; a gap allows a limited exchange between the two parts. Its drainage basin approaches 57,000 sq
km (or 51,786 sq km, authors differ) and the lake is the terminal basin for a number of streams and rivers. Annual inflow is
6900 x 106 m3 (Ghaheri et al., 1999). During
spring runoff a freshwater plume covers large areas over the saline
lake near river mouths. Prominent perennial streams include the
Zarrineh River (230 km long) entering from the south and draining part of the
northern Zagros with a range in discharge of 10-510 cu m per second
with the Tata'u or Simineh River (145 km) as a major tributary, the saline
Aji Chay or Talkheh (= bitter) River from the east draining the flanks of Kuhha-ye Sabalan at
4810 m (38°15'N, 47°49'E) and Kuh-e Sahand at 3710 m (37°44'N, 46°27'E),
and the smaller streams from the west such as the Zowla (=
"Zola") Chay (84 km), Nazlu Chay (85 km), Shahr (= "Shaher")
Chay (70 km), Baranduz Chay (70 km) and Gadar (= "Qader") Chay (100 km) (Günther, 1899).
Both the Zarrineh and the Talkheh exceed 200 km in length. The Talkheh
River has a hardness of 820 mg/l according to Surber (1969), who also
gives values of total alkalinity and calcium-magnesium hardness for a
number of streams and lakes around Tabriz. The Talkheh floods extensively in the
spring and forms large marshes. Most streams were
relatively hard like the Talkheh although some were soft such as the
Basmenj Chay draining Kuh-e Sahand at 70 mg/l.
Lake Kobi (= Ghopi) is a Ramsar Site lying at 36°57'N,
45°52'E and 1240 m altitude in this basin. It is south of Lake Orumiyeh and northeast of Mahabad. It
comprises the fresh to brackish lake and associated but discontinuous
marshes of about 1200 ha. The endorheic lake is shallow with a maximum
depth of 1.5 m and a mud bottom. It is fed by precipitation and
springs, and when full floods marshes to the north. It freezes over in
winter. The lake is eutrophic and has reedbeds of Phragmites
communis and abundant submerged vegetation. Livestock grazing and
wildfowl hunting occur.
The Shur Gol and the "Yadegarlu" (= Yadergarlu) and
"Dorgeh Sangi" endorheic lakes are at 37°00', 45°26-35'E south of Lake Orumiyeh and
northwest of Mahabad at 1290 m are also a Ramsar Site comprising 2500
ha of lakes and associated marshes. They are fed by precipitation,
springs and small streams. Shur Gol at 2000 ha is surrounded by the
Hassanlu Marshes. Its water is brackish to saline. The eutrophic
marshes flood in fall and winter and have abundant submerged
vegetation. "Yadegarlu" is a shallow freshwater lake of 350
ha with abundant submerged vegetation and a surrounding of eutrophic
sedge marshes. It may dry out in summer. It apparently suffered in the
Iran-Iraq war (Jones, www.ramsar.org/lib_dir_2_3.htm, downloaded 4
April 2000) and may be deleted as a Ramsar Site. "Dorgeh Sangi"
is 150 ha in extent and is a shallow freshwater and eutrophic lake.
All three lakes may freeze over in winter. Reed cutting, grazing and
waterfowl hunting occurs in this complex and some drainage of wetlands
for agriculture may occur (Khan et al., 1992).
"Gerde Gheet" (Gordeh Git) and "Mamiyand"
(= Meimand?) at 37°02'N, 45°40'E are freshwater marshes south of Lake Orumiyeh and north of Mahabad
occupy 500 ha at 1300 m. The marshes are covered by Phragmites.
Waterfowl hunting occurs here and some livestock grazing.
The "Ghara Gheshlaq" freshwater marshes at 37°10'N,
45°50'E occupy 400 ha at 1290 m south of Lake Orumiyeh and north of Mahabad. The water is about 1 m deep,
eutrophic and freezes over in winter. Large parts of these marshes
were drained by the "Mahabad Multipurpose Drainage and Irrigation
Project" in the 1970s despite environmental concerns. Cornwallis
(1976) notes both the draining of these marshes and the cessation of
freshwater discharge from the Mahabad River. He also points out the
likelihood of chemical contamination from agriculture, choking by
vegetation and the probable use of herbicides. He recommends
introduction of Ctenopharyngodon idella and Hypophthalmichthys
molitrix. The marshes have been proposed as a Ramsar Site.
Lagoons in the Mahabad area dried in the year 2000 (www.irna.com/newshtm/eng/05142727.htm,
IRNA, 26 July 2000).
Gori Gol or Lake Gory at 37°5'N, 46°42'E
is a fresh to brackish lake near Tabriz occupying 120 ha at 1950 m. Depth is 2-3
m on average. It is a Ramsar Site (World Conservation Monitoring Centre, 1990; Scott,
1995). It is fed by precipitation, springs and small streams, with
overflow through a small stream. The lake freezes over in winter. The
submerged vegetation is abundant and there are extensive reedbeds of Phragmites
communis, Juncus, Carex and Scirpus. It is
under pressure from the population of the major city of Tabriz through
sport fishing and wildfowl hunting as well as reed cutting and cattle grazing.
Qanats are found in this basin where surface water is saline. About
225 million cu m of water are produced annually by qanats and wells on
the northern and eastern coast of the lake (Alamouti, 1966). Dams are
found on the Zarrineh River and on the river which flows through
Mahabad paralleling the Zarrineh. The Mahabad Dam has a fish catch of
130 tons (sic) annually and 300,000 fingerlings (species
unspecified) were stocked to save the fish reserves from possible
extinction (IRNA, 7 January 1999). The Mahabad reservoir has a
leech fauna (Codonobdella trunata, Parcanthobdella livanowi,
Baicalobdella torquata, Piscicola geometra) which may
affect local fish farms and fish populations elsewhere if fish are
transplanted (Abdi, 1999: www.mondialvet99.com, downloaded 31 May
2000). The Nowruzlu Dam on the Zarrineh is at 36°55'N, 46°10'E, occupying 1000 ha at 1260 m. It
is water storage reservoir with heavy input from surrounding farming
activities. The Alavian Dam near Maragheh is 80 m high, 935 m long and
has a reservoir of 145 million cu m (http://netiran.com/news/IRNA/html/951214IRGG11.html).
The Nahand Reservoir Dam northeast of Tabriz was inaugurated in 1995
with a capacity of 30 million cu m and a second dam, the Shahid Madani
also near Tabriz, was under construction. Other dams include those at
Ahar, Tabriz, Hashtrud, Hasanlu, Mianeh (= Onligh) and Heris which
were scheduled to be completed in the period 1995-2000 (http://netiran.com/news/TehranTimes/95121601TTEC.html
and www.irna.com/newshtm/eng/12003142.htm, IRNA, 2 July 2000). ? check
basins for dams
The Hassanlou Reservoir Dam at Naqadeh was to open in 1998 with a
height of 10 m, a crest of 5160 m (sic) and a capacity of 107
million cu m (http://netiran.com/news/IRNA/html/950915IRGG06.html).
A total of 6 reservoir dams and 10 dams for re-directing water flow will
decrease water input to the lake by 1.04 billion cu m by 2014. The volume
of surface water has fallen from 42 to 22 billion cu m since 1995. The
lake salt has increased to more than 260g/l, up from about 185 g/l. The lake may
well dry up by 2014 (IRNA, 10 September 2001).
Löffler (1993) details the eutrophication threat to this lake
since a traffic embankment was built across the lake 35 km north of
Orumiyeh in 1990. Untreated sewage from Orumiyeh will pollute the
southern part of the lake.
Pollution occurs in various localities on a sporadic basis such as
the Godar River in Naqadeh where a fish kill numbering in the
thousands was reported (Tehran Times, 18 July 1999).
Haji Hassani et al. (2004) found that levels of Ni, Pb and Cu in the
Talkheh Rud were higher than acceptable limits for fish culture while Cr and Fe
were lower. The river receives waste water from agricultural and industrial activities.
Water reservoirs behind the Mahabad, Miandoab and Shahid Kazemi dams were
stocked with 3.6 million fish fry (species not specified) from the Pol-e Dasht
Complex in 2000. This aquaculture site has the capacity to produce 4
million fry. West Azarbayjan produces over 600 tons of fish annually (Tehran
Times, 2 January 2001).
Lake Orumiyeh is the largest natural habitat for brine shrimp in the world and, since 2000, is has been harvested, processed and
used to feed sturgeon in hatcheries (www.worldfishingcompanies.com/html/us/world.report.html?id=1, downloaded 23 October 2001).
The lake was formed during the late Pliocene-Pleistocene and lies
at 1275-1300 m and may well have had a Pleistocene connection to the
Caspian Sea basin although this is in dispute (Scharlu, 1968;
Schweizer, 1975). Pleistocene shorelines from 30 to 115 m above the
present level have been confirmed, and the lake covered twice its
present area, but this would not permit an external discharge. Berg
(1940) reports benches at levels of about 1800 m, 1650-1550 m and
1500-1360 m, which may represent shorelines, and a level of about 1570
m would have had an outlet to the Aras River basin through the Kara-tepe
Pass in the northwest and across the plain near Khvoy. Saadati (1977)
suggests two connections with the Caspian Sea, an early one in the
Pliocene to early Pleistocene resulting in endemic species and a later
one in the late Pleistocene resulting in species which are the same as
the Caspian or only subspecifically distinct. Stream capture may have allowed the entry of some species in recent
times as evidenced by a Salmo trutta population.
Fish farming is extensive in West Azarbayjan. In the Iranian year ending 20
March 2002, 840 tonnes of coldwater fish were produced and 3000 t of warmwater
fish (Tehran Times, 24 November 2002).
Günther (1899) details a method of catching fish used in the
rivers of this basin. Flour and the pounded berries of Cocculus
indicus are mixed with butter to form a stiff paste. Small pellets
of the paste are thrown into slow flowing water and after 10-15
minutes, if the fish are feeding, they will begin to swim at the
surface in small circles or lie helpless in the shallows and are then
easily scooped up. Some fish can recover from the poison. There is no
effect on humans if poisoned fish are eaten.
Berg (1940) considers that this basin falls within his assignment
of the Iranian shore of the Caspian Sea. Species in common
include Leuciscus (= Squalius) cephalus, Barbus lacerta, Gobio
persus, Capoeta capoeta, Alburnoides bipunctatus,
and Silurus glanis, and Acanthalburnus urmianus is
related to A. microlepis. Groombridge (1992) notes that the
ichthyofauna of this region is badly in need of re-examination.
Namak Lake
This basin is flanked by the Alborz Mountains to the north and the
Zagros Mountains to the west. On the east is the vast expanse of the
Kavir basin and on the south such ranges as the Kuh-e Karkas at 3899 m
(33°27'N, 51°48'E). The basin encloses about 87,600 sq km.
A small sump near Arak (34°05'N, 49°41'E)
is included as part of this basin as it is not separated by any major
landform. A second salt lake is the Howz-e Soltan by the Tehran-Qom
road and this lies in the same depression as the much larger Namak
Lake south of Tehran. The lowest part of this basin is at 765 m and is
covered by water in spring but this generally evaporates by the middle
of summer.
The proximity of the capital, Tehran, to the rivers of this basin
and its rapid growth in population and industry has led to many water
diversionary schemes (Anonymous, 2003). A proposed dam northwest of Tehran would be the largest man-made lake
in the country and the Middle East (sic) (Nouri et al., 2005).
Much of this basin lies in Markazi or Central Province which has 42
dams of varying sizes. The Abbasabad Embankment Dam in Khomein, for
example, is 36 m high, has a crest of 260 m and has a reservoir of
25,000 ha (IRNA, 3 February 1999).
The principal river in the west draining the Alborz south towards the Namak Lake is the Karaj River. Average
temperatures of the Karaj River at the dam site before construction
ranged from 2.5°C in January to 16.4°C
in August (Nümann, 1966). Rieben (1954) and Hariri (1966) give
details of surface and ground water in this river basin. The Amir
Kabir Dam on the Karaj contains 205 million cu m of water and feeds
through pipelines to Tehran. The reservoir has an area of 4 sq km at
high water, 1.1 sq km at low water. Vladykov (1964) and Nümann (1966,
1969) give some details on the limnology of this reservoir,
particularly temperature regimes. The Karaj has a discharge of 124 cu
m per second in spring but this falls to 4.2 cu m per second in
autumn. 55.6% of the annual discharge occurs during spring. There is
no vegetation because of the steep rock sides and water fluctuations.
Nümann (1966) recommended stocking the Karaj reservoir with Coregonus
sp., Sander lucioperca, Acanthobrama terraesanctae (a
Levantine species) and cichlids from Israel as environmental
conditions and plankton levels were suitable.
Nadim (1977) found the highest mercury levels in fish from the Karaj were 0.05
mg/kg. As the acceptable limit was 0.5 mg/kg, mercury contamination in fish was
not considered a problem.
The Abhar River and its tributaries drain the land west of Tehran
and south of Qazvin (36°16'N, 50°00'E).
Its headwaters approach those of the Zanjan River, a Caspian Sea
tributary. The course of the Abhar is about 350 km from its headwaters
to the terminal sump. The lower part of this river is known as the
Shur and is salty. Sewage and untreated factory wastes, as much as
40,000 cu m, flowed into the streams around the city of Qazvin
although waste-water and sewage treatment plants are offsetting this
problem (http://netiran.com/news/IRNA/html/941220IRGG05.html).
Other rivers draining the Alborz are much shorter. The Jajrud (Jaj,
Jaji or Jaje River) to the east of Tehran is dammed at Latian (95
million cu m) for the Tehran water supply also. The Jajrud discharge
is 60.5 cu m per second in spring and 1.5 cu m per second in autumn.
Nümann (1966) reports fish kills in the thousands for Capoeta
buhsei on turbid spring floods of this river. The Band Ali Khan River flows
from the Khasrang Mountain (as does the the Jajrud which it receives) and its
branches on the Varamin Plain are used for irrigation. Much of this river is
polluted from wastes in the Jajrud and Tehran's sewage floodway (Rohani, 2004). The Lar River, a
Caspian Sea tributary, was scheduled for diversion via a massive
tunnel into the Jajrud (Marwick and Germond, 1975a; 1975b). This would
affect flow in the Heraz River of the Caspian Sea basin and plans to
offset this involved weirs and canal construction no doubt with the
usual deleterious effects on fishes. These major projects are a far
cry from the days in the twentieth century when Tehran depended solely on qanats for its water supply (Rieben, 1954).
The Namak Lake receives the Qareh Su (Gharechay), which flows north of Qom, and
the Qom River from the Zagros Mountains. Discharge of both these
rivers is about 312 cu m per second in flood falling to about 4 cu m
per second in October (Oberlander, 1968b). The Qareh Su exceeds 400 km
in length. The Qom River has captured headwater streams of Persian
Gulf drainage. The Golpayegan River near Golpayegan has a storage
reservoir, the Sadd-e Shah Esma`il. Borowicka (1958) gives some early
figures on siltation and irrigation requirements. The Haroon Canal had
diverted water for irrigation from the Golpayegan River for over 1000
years, and during the summer and fall all river water entered this
canal. The Ghadir or Qadir Dam near Saveh has a volume of 290 million
cu m of water. The 15th Khordad Dam is located 80 km south of Qom on
the Qom-Delijan road (http://netiran.com/news/IranNews/html/95030718INPL.html).
The Khandab Diversionary Dam is near Arak (http://netiran.com/news/IRNA/html/951217IRGG09.html).
Egglishaw (1980) gives some details on the water quality and
environment of rivers and streams of this basin. Imandel et al.
(1978) recorded ground water pollution by detergents in Tehran, where
there was no method of sewage disposal other than discharge to wells
and seepage pits. Södergren et al. (1978) reported on
pollution with organochlorines in the Karaj and Latian reservoirs. Capoeta
buhsei, Oncorhynchus mykiss, Alburnoides bipunctatus,
Coregonus sp. had accumulated the DDT metabolite p,p'-DDE,
particularly in the Latian Reservoir. Direct removal of plants for
fuel and laying bare the roots of such thorny plants as "giavan"
for extracting gum tragacanth leading to plant loss has caused soil
loss by erosion, gullying and affected recharge of groundwater. Poor
farming practices on steep slopes has also led to the loss of topsoil
such that runoff is too fast for infiltration of rain and snow (Rieben,
1954). These factors causing silting of reservoirs, added silt input
to rivers and reduced groundwater recharge with consequent reduction
in spring and qanat flows, all detrimental to fish habitats. Some
areas of southern Tehran receive 300 kg/ha/yr of sulphate ions as acid
rain which lowers river pH and has effects on the fish fauna (Salahi Kojoure, 1997). An effluent leak from a power station in the Vian area of Hamedan sent
40-50,000 litres of furnace oil into 1 km of river in the Qareh Su basin (Iran Network 1,
Persian TV, 1730 GMT, 2 January 2000). Monavari and Mardani (2007) record the
effects of sewage from fish culture ponds in this basin on water quality in the
Jajrud, most factors being within acceptable limits except coliform bacteria.
Qanats are still a major feature of this basin. Alamouti (1966)
records 260 qanats producing 99 million cu m per year on the Varamin
Plain (35°20'N, 51°39'E),
220 qanats producing 161 million cu m per year on the Karaj Plain and
600 qanats producing 200 million cu m per year on the Qazvin Plain.
However numerous pump wells have led to the drying of qanats and a
complex irrigation system has reduced groundwater recharge (Beaumont,
1974). Alibekov (1994) gives a Russian account of qanats in Central
Asia and also refers to those around Tehran in the Namak basin.
The Qazvin area has more than 20 aquarium fish farms producing over 2 million
fish (www.tehrantimes.com, downloaded 28 July 2004). Waters in this area drain
also to the Caspian Sea and there may be potential for escapes of exotics.
Berg (1940) refers this basin to his Tehran District of the Iranian
Province. He notes that some drainages are close to those of the
Caspian Sea basin and that the fauna may be of quite recent origin,
rather than the Pliocene advocated by Derzhavin (1934) for Salmo
trutta.
Saadati (1977) considered that the fish fauna of this basin was not
derived from movements through a large freshwater lake connecting all
the tributaries. Some species came from the Caspian Sea basin and
others from the Esfahan and Tigris River basins. The basin may also
have served as a "filter-bridge" allowing such species as Capoeta
aculeata, Capoeta capoeta and the progenitor of Capoeta
fusca to reach the Dasht-e Kavir basin.
Sirjan
The Sirjan basin extends south-east of the Esfahan basin and
parallels the Yazd basin. It is named for the town of Sirjan at 29°28'N,
55°42'E which lies at the edge of the
largest salt flat in the basin. It is somewhat higher than the Esfahan
basin which is at 1300 m, being 1448-1710 m. It is distinguished from
the Esfahan basin by its lack of a significant river. There are four
major sumps in this basin, strung out along its length at regular
intervals, and the northern two are connected as are the southern two.
The sumps are fed by intermittent streams. Qanats and minor springs
are found in this basin which has not been extensively explored. The
sump in the north near Abarqu (31°08'N, 53°17'E) receives streams from the west (Kuh-e
Bul at 3661 m and 30°48'N, 52°45'E) and from the east (Khar Kuh at 3512 m and 31°39'N,
53°46'E, and Shir Kuh at 4074 m and 31°37'N, 54°04'E). The southern basins near Sirjan
receive their streams from lower elevations.
Sistan
The Sistan (= Seistan) basin straddles the Iran-Afghanistan border
and is a north-west to south-east oval in shape. It comprises a number
of minor streams and qanats flowing from the west and the Birjand
highlands, but these are rapidly absorbed or run for only a few days
each year. Its most obvious feature is the vast hamun or swamp
comprising open freshwater lakes, reed beds or neizar, and the
rivers that feed the lakes. This is a major oasis of fresh water surrounded by
hundreds of kilometres of arid plains. Huntington (1905a; 1905b), Annandale
(1919a), Ahmadi and Wossughi (1988), Noorbakhsh (1993), Mansoori
(1994), Ibrahimzadeh (1995), Scott (1995), Weier (2002) and CIRSPE (2006a) give descriptions of this
basin. Note that Weier's (2002) statement (repeated in various newspaper
reports and in UNEP (2003)) that there is nearly 140 species of
fish in Sistan is an error by an order of magnitude! The native ichthyofauna comprises a mixture of endemic species,
species related to or conspecific with high-altitude species from
Central Asia and species from Baluchestan in the wider sense. There is
little relationship to species from Iran to the west. Variations in
water level and crowded conditions lead to disease and parasite
outbreaks in the fishes (Mansoori, 1994).
The principal river is the Helmand (or Hirmand) which flows from
the Paghman Mountains just west of Kabul to end in Sistan after a
journey of 1400 km. Along with the Hari or Tedzhen, this is the only major river
entering Iran. Snow and rain in the Hindu Kush mountains ultimately
reaches Sistan at 427 m from heights of 5300 m. The Helmand is the
most important river between the Tigris and the Indus and drains an
area of 386,000 sq km of which 78,000 sq km or 20.2% lies in Iran (Gleick, 1993).
The Helmand produces 1700-2000 cu m per second in flood and 56 cu m
per second in the dry season. The average annual flow is 78 cu m per second. The river varies between 200 and 900 m
in width and between 2 and 5 m in depth. The annual water income to
Iran is about 6 billion cu m but this varies markedly and was 14,740
million cu m in 1970-1971 and 1976-1977 and 600 cu m in 1985-1986 (Mansoori,
1994). UNEP (2003) gives the following flows in million cu m:-
| 1991-2 |
1992-3 |
1993-4 |
1994-5 |
1995-6 |
1996-7 |
1997-8 |
1998-9 |
1999-2000 |
2000-1 |
| 2211.7 |
1783.8 |
529.5 |
829.7 |
1023.8 |
908.7 |
2193 |
258.8 |
114.1 |
48 |
As it enters the Sistan depression, the Helmand splits into
several branches which feed the swamps, the two main ones being the
Sistan feeding the Hamun-e Helmand (also Hirmand or Hamun Lake) in
Iran and the Parian feeding the Hamun-e Puzak (or Parian) lying mostly
in Afghanistan. The northern part of the Hamun-e Helmand is called
Hamun-e Sabari, or Lake Sistan, which lies half in Afghanistan and
half in Iran, and the southern part is called Hamun-e Hirmand. Hamun-e
Sabari receives water from the Farah River and overflow from Hamun-e
Puzak. The Hamun-e Hirmand receives water from the southern or Sistan
branch of the Helmand River and overflow from Hamun-e Sabari. Other
rivers flowing from Afghanistan are the Harut, Khospas and Khash but
their flow is minor and intermittent compared to the Helmand (Gabriel,
1938). The whole lake area of Sistan is often called the Hamun Lake.
The plentiful natural flow of the Helmand is reduced by irrigation
dams in Afghanistan; the Arqhandab and Kajaki dams extract about half
of the 12 billion cu m which enter the Afghan plain (Michel, 1973;
Mansoori, 1994; Mojtahedzadeh, 2001). A third dam is under construction in Afghanistan
without environmental considerations being taken into account (World
Conservation Monitoring Centre, 1990). The proposed Kamal Khan Dam on
the Helmand in Afghanistan and the "Sistan Drainage and
Irrigation Completion and Rehabilitation Project" in Iran would
lower water level in the lake complex. There are also plans to divert
water from the Sistan area to the city of Zahedan in the south. The
Char-Neimeh (or Chahnimeh) Lake is a depression used as a water
reservoir and is filled from the Parian branch of the Helmand. It has
a surface area of 4,700 ha and is used for irrigation and fish culture
but does reduce flow into the hamuns. However floods in spring 1991
destroyed the Kajaki Dam and associated irrigation controls and the
lakes were more extensive than they had been in over a decade. Rainfall in
Afghanistan increased flow of the Helmand in 2003 and some flooding was expected
in Sistan (www.irna.com, downloaded 23 April 2003).
The Helmand was dry at the Iran-Afghanistan border in 2004 (Gall, 2004). Sadeq
(1999) lists several factors which are threatening the Hamun Lake
namely, fluctuation in incoming water, sedimentation, exotic species,
urbanization and increased population pressure on the hamun resources.
The south end of Hamun-e Puzak and the contiguous Hamun-e Sabari
(or Lake Hamun) are Ramsar Sites (World Conservation Monitoring Centre,
1990). The Lake Hamun Ramsar Site is on the threatened list of
National Parks (Anonymous, 1988b).
Puzak is very shallow, with maximum depth of less than 4 m, and is
the first of the Sistan lakes to flood and may never dry out
completely unlike the other lakes (Khan et al., 1992; Scott,
1995). This lake has extensive reed beds of Phragmites australis
with associated submerged Ceratophyllum demersum and relatively
little open water. Reeds are cut as forage for cattle, burnt to
improve grazing for livestock, used for boats, for wind-breaks and for
cooking and heating. Local people engage in fishing.
The Helmand is very turbid and deposits 8 g of silt for each litre
of water (Fisher, 1968). The sediment load in 1975-1976 was 15,149,000
t and in 1985-1986 280,000 t (Mansoori, 1994). Drinking water looks
like milk! (personal observations, 1977). Rain accounts for little input to the lake, the annual mean
precipitation over 12 years being only 51 mm, most rain falling within
10-15 days (Mansoori, 1994). UNEP (2003) reports evidence of pesticide pollution
in the Helmand and the swamps, e.g. dieldrin.
The lake bottom in Iran is clay and silt and the waters are
markedly alkaline. Water at the edges of the reed swamp were 31°C
in early May, warmer than the inflowing rivers and the irrigation
ditches which were only 22°C at this
time. Annandale (1919a) and Mansoori (1994) give a brief chemistry of
Sistan water. There are marked variations in conductivity,
temperature, pH, oxygen, alkalinity and hardness between sites.
Conductivity ranges from 1280 to 64,000 mmhos (sic), pH from
7.5 to 9.15, oxygen from 0.64 to 11 mg/l, alkalinity from 3.6 to 165
mval and hardness (CaCO3) 180 to 3500 mg/l in Mansoori's
water samples from the Hamun Lake.
Evaporation lowers the water level each year and is caused by
extreme heat and the famous Bad-e Sad-o Bist Ruz (Wind of 120 Days)
which approaches 200 km per hour. This wind causes serious erosion and
marching sand dunes often block streams causing them to change
channel. Evaporation has been measured at 4 m per year because of
temperatures over 40°C in July (Mansoori,
1994). Refilling occurs in February-June and in flood years various
hamuns are joined together into one vast lake. 75% of flooding occurs
in March-May. There are about 3900 sq km of seasonal lake and marsh at
a maximum, dropping to 1930 sq km in July-January. The maximum flood
zone is about 200 km long and 20 km wide, but the lakes have dried up
completely, or almost so, at least 5 times in the past 100 years, e.g.
in 1907, 1962 for 5 years, 1970-1971, 1984 for 4 years, 1988-1989, and
1998-2002, with major fish kills resulting (Tate, 1910; Harrington, 1976; Costantini
and Tosi, 1978; Anonymous, 1992a; Khan et al., 1992; MacFarquahar, 2001;
Foltz, 2002; Weier, 2002; www.netiran.com, downloaded 18
June 2002). There was a big flood in March 1989, spring 1990 and an exceptional flood in
February/March 1991 (Khan et al., 1992). The lakes filled in 2005 (E.
Penning, pers. comm., 28 July 2005). Mansoori (1994)
mentions historical floods, e.g. in 1247 A.D., and droughts, e.g. in 835 A.D.
UNEP (2003) gives satellite photographs showing variations in water extent. The
fish fauna can recolonise